Talk:SMS Brummer (1884)/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|Parsecboy}} 11:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 16:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
role="presentation" border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" align="center" |
align="center"
| style="border: 1px solid #BBB;" width="775pt" | Good Article review progress box {| role="presentation" |
Criteria: 1a. prose ({{GAList/check| y}}) 1b. MoS ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2a. ref layout ({{GAList/check| Y}}) 2b. cites WP:RS ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2c. no WP:OR ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2d. no WP:CV ({{GAList/check| y}}) |
align="center"
| 3a. broadness ({{GAList/check| y}}) 3b. focus ({{GAList/check| y}}) 4. neutral ({{GAList/check| y}}) 5. stable ({{GAList/check| y}}) 6a. free or tagged images ({{GAList/check|y }}) 6b. pics relevant ({{GAList/check| y}}) |
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked 14px are unassessed |
|}
=Comments=
- "After a lengthy period in reserve, she joined the gunnery training school". 1. Is it known when this happened? 2, Could it be mentioned in the main article.
- Clarified in both places - this was in 1892
- The division leader image needs a US PD tag.
- Added
- Any chance you could email me a copy of Hildebrande et al Vol 2 page 147? Thanks.
- No problem at all.
- Except I don't think I have your email! If you email me, I'll send it over. Parsecboy (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
::::Sent. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::You should have it, let me know if it didn't go. Parsecboy (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- "a platform was built was installed aft"?
- Whoops!
=Checks=
- Passes Earwig.
- Sources look solid to me.
- Images are appropriately tagged.
- My German is rubbish, but several spot checks came up positive.
Gog the Mild (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Great stuff. That was easy. A nice little article. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)