Talk:SMS Mücke/GA1

GA review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:SMS Mücke/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Mücke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Parsecboy}} 15:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Will review soon. Jaguar (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

;Body

  • "...which included plans to build at least eight vessels, to as many as eighteen armored warships" - try condensing to {{xt|ranging from plans to build eight to as many as eighteen armored warships.}}
  • "as designed and 1,163 t (1,145 long tons) at full load" - I assume it increases at full load? Maybe {{xt|as designed, increasing to 1,163 t (1,145 long tons) at full load}}
  • " and in that time, she was refitted with an additional 8.7 cm (3.4 in)" - {{xt|during which she was refitted}}
  • " Mücke again served as the flagship for the unit, which also included Viper, Salamander, and their sister Camaeleon." - can be shortened to {{xt| with Mücke once again serving as flagship alongside Viper, Salamander, and their sister Camaeleon.}}

Another well-written article, nothing much from me this time other than those nitpicks. I see no reason to put it on hold, and will promote outright given it's comprehensiveness. Well done. {{icon|GA}} Jaguar (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)