Talk:Sinsharishkun/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Sinsharishkun/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Sinsharishkun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 08:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise. {{GAList/check|y}}
2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct. {{GAList/check|y}}
3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections. {{GAList/check|y}}
4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout. {{GAList/check|y}}
5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch (e.g., "awesome" and "stunning"). {{GAList/check|y}}
6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations – not applicable.
9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided. {{GAList/check|y}}
10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc. {{GAList/check|y}}
11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline. {{GAList/check|y}}
12. No original research. {{GAList/check|y}}
13. No copyright violations or plagiarism. {{GAList/check|y}}
14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style. {{GAList/check|y}}
15. Neutral. {{GAList/check|y}}
16. Stable. {{GAList/check|y}}
17. Illustrated, if possible. {{GAList/check|y}}
18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright. {{GAList/check|y}}

For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

As with Ashur-etil-ilani earlier, this is well written and reliably sourced. The coverage is in scope and doesn't over-speculate about another enigmatic subject. I just made a few tweaks as I was going through it. I'm pleased to promote it to GA. Two in one day. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

:{{reply to|No Great Shaker}} As before, thank you very much for taking the time to look through this one, and for passing the review :) Ichthyovenator (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)