Talk:Songbird Sings the Classics/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Songbird Sings the Classics/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Songbird Sings the Classics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 19:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. ::
5. : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. ::
7. ::
8. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
9. : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}}
10. ::
    1. ::
    2. : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}}
    3. ::
       1. ::
       2. : c. (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
       3. ::
       4. ::
       5. : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
       6. ::
       7. ::
       8. It is broad in its coverage.
       9. : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}}
       10. ::
           1. ::
           2. : b. (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
           3. ::
              1. ::
              2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
              3. : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
              4. ::
              5. ::
              6. It is stable.
              7. : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
              8. ::
                 1. ::
                 2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
                 3. : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 4. ::
                 5. ::
                 6. : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 7. ::
                 8. ::
                 9. Overall:
                 10. : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
                 11. ::
                 12. ::

                 (Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)

                 This should be a nice, smooth review! --K. Peake 19:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

• Infobox looks good!
• Add a comma after Regine Velasquez in the first sentence

::Done

• "as its sponsor." → "as the sponsor."

::Done

• Pipe 1960s to 1960s in music

::Done

• Pipe 1970s to 1970s in music

::Done

• Remove the introduction to Gerard Salonga per it being done in the body

::Removed and tweaked

• "the intimate show and Velasquez's and" → "the intimate show, and Velasquez's and"

::Done

Thanks for the initial comments. Actioned per responses above. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

:{{u|Pseud 14}} I meant pipe to the plural for the 1960s and 1970s music articles; do this in the body too, please. --K. Peake 08:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

::I see what you mean. Done (I think) Pseud 14 (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

• "It marked her first collaboration" → "It marked Velasquez's first collaboration"
• "with his sister Lea Salonga." → "with his sister Lea." per MOS:SAMESURNAME

::Done above

• "into a Henry Mancini tribute number," → "into a Mancini tribute number,"
• "The next number saw her perform" → "The next number saw Velasquez perform"
• "she stood next to" → "Velasquez stood next to"
• "He highlighted how" → "Cruz highlighted how"

::Done above

• Use the full name of RPN
• Wikilink live album
• Mention that the certification was in the Philippines and how many units it represents

::I added the number of units sold and included a source for shipments of albums required to achieve platinum status. Same source can be found in her discography. As for adding Philippines, the certifying body (PARI) already mentions that, so I think it would be redundant to add it again.

• Good

• Good

• [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Songbird_Sings_the_Classics&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Copyvio score] looks definitely great at 20.0%!!!
• Add via Google Books with the wikilink for refs 1, 4, 5 and 6

::Added

• Good

• {{onhold}} until all of the issues are fixed; shouldn't take long at all especially with your speed! --K. Peake 08:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

::Thanks for taking up this review K. Peake. I have addressed your comments and provided my responses above. Let me know if I missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

::*{{Pass}} now, great job on this! --K. Peake 20:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)