Talk:Strike Back: Project Dawn/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Strike Back: Project Dawn/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Strike Back: Project Dawn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 01:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

:**There are only two Strike Back related pages, this one, and the the previous series. I don't think that two pages is worth a navbox. -- Matthew RD 17:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

::**When the article for the next series is created a navbox might be considered along with a list of episodes and a list of characters as well as a franchis page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

  • I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strike_Back:_Project_Dawn&diff=468987183&oldid=468875588 added some links].--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

;WP:LEAD

:*Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

;Series overview

  • I have never seen this series. I am unable to tell if they find Latif or Porter, if their unit endures casualties, if they find WMDs, if the series ends in a cliffhanger, etc. The overview in general leaves me wondering a lot and probably does not summarize the important details of the series.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Some more of the details from the episodes below belongs here, I believe.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

;Cast and characters

:*Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

::What? "However, the only cast member to return from the original series was Richard Armitage in the first episode. " If my english is good, this sentence is not correct. Richard Armitage is not the only member to return, since the two main characters are still the same. Luckyboy1965 (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

;Critical reactions

:*Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

:*I'm not sure what you mean on this one. Could you elaborate? -- Matthew RD 17:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

::*If you mention another TV show or movie, the first time you do it should be wikilinked.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

:::*Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

;Episodes

  1. "find the second" - what was the first; demanding->demand
  2. turns out to a woman->turns out to be a woman; was to be planted->were to be planted; is being escorted->is escorted
  3. first sentence quite run-on
  4. O.K.
  5. O.K.
  6. their vehicle breaks down and are forced->their vehicle breaks down, and they are forced
  7. his cousin, Rana from->his cousin, Rana, from
  8. O.K.
  9. O.K.
  10. Section base and they->Section base, and they--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

:Done fixes on the episodes section. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

:I am placing this article on hold. The concerns should be relatively easy to address within the next 7 days when I will reassess the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

::Well done. I am Passing this article right now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)