Talk:Sukhoi Su-35/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Sukhoi Su-35/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Sukhoi Su-35/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: RohG ??· 14:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Nominator: Sp33dyphil

class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"
valign="top"

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

valign="top"

|

| 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

|

{{GATable/item|1a|+| Fine.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|+| Lead is good..

}}

valign="top"

|

| 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

|

{{GATable/item|2a|+| yes.

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|+| Well sourced.No plagiarism.

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|+| no prob.

}}

valign="top"

|

| 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

|

{{GATable/item|3a|+| yes.

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|+| yeah.

}}

{{GATable/item|4|+| Not particularly controversial.

}}

{{GATable/item|5|+| Yes.

}}

valign="top"

|

| 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

|

{{GATable/item|6a|+| yes.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|+| Alright.

}}

{{GATable/item|7|+| Whoa! Passed.

}}

=Errors/comments=

:* More than a dozen of these were built with(What??) some used by the Russian Knights aerobatic demonstration team RohG ??· 15:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

::* A word was missing there. That's been fixed. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

::*{{done}}

:*I would like to see a good pic under upgraded su-27..If you can do so.. no probs.

::*I'm afraid there are no pictures of the first Su-35s. The photos that you see are all Su-35BMs. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

::* The Su-35UB and Russian Knights Su-35 images are both pre-Su-35BM/S. Note the canards near the engine inlets. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

::* Hello mate!what i supposed to say is ,if you have any other images for upgraded su-27 please upload it. so that the picture will meet wiki standards.

  1. : 15px Note: The image updated is up to wiki standards but if you have a good one replace it with the old one.

::*{{done}} Fine!

:*Article already has Operational History.. No need of Operators?

::* It is a standard section per WP:Aircraft layout and is very short. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

::*{{done}} Alright

:* All issues are fixed!Promoted to GA.Hope this article make a FA status.Thanks to the Nominator for a wonderful article.