Talk:Sydenham#Disambiguation required

:The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

----

• :Sydenham (disambiguation) → {{no redirect|Sydenham}}
• :Sydenham → {{no redirect|Sydenham, London}}

– I don't see a primary topic over the large number of other uses, even just 9 others get almost as many views https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Sydenham, see previous discussion at Talk:Sydenham#Disambiguation required. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. With 35 entries at the Sydenham (disambiguation) page, there is no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose. I'm afraid I do think this is the clear primary topic in this instance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
• Support. Half pageviews isn't enough. --Quiz shows 22:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
• Support - no clear primary topic. Paintspot Infez (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
• Support this move 98.239.227.65 (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.