Talk:Talking to Yourself/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Talking to Yourself/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Talking to Yourself/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Unlimitedlead (talk · contribs) 00:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

{{pb}}

{{ping|MaranoFan}} It is a pleasure to work with you once again. I will take on this GA review; please bear with me. Unlimitedlead (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

:Thrilled that you are reviewing this, Unlimitedlead!! The pleasure is most definitely mutual :) --NØ 04:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check| y }}
  3. ::
  4. ::
  5. : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check| y }}
  6. ::
  7. ::
  8. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  9. : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y }}
  10. ::

    1. ::
    2. : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y }}
    3. ::

      1. ::
      2. : c. (OR): {{GAList/check| y }}
      3. ::
      4. ::
      5. : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check| y }}
      6. ::
      7. ::
      8. It is broad in its coverage.
      9. : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y }}
      10. ::

        1. ::
        2. : b. (focused): {{GAList/check| y }}
        3. ::

          1. ::
          2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
          3. : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check| y }}
          4. ::
          5. ::
          6. It is stable.
          7. : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y }}
          8. ::

            1. ::
            2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
            3. : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y }}
            4. ::
            5. ::
            6. : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y }}
            7. ::
            8. ::
            9. Overall:
            10. : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check| y }}
            11. ::
            12. ::

            (Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)

            Lead

            • "Jepsen wrote it with songwriter Simon Wilcox, and Benjamin Berger and Ryan Rabin from its production team Captain Cuts": What are you referring to when you say "its"? Are Berger and Rabin not humans?
            • I would introduce Schoolboy Records and Interscope Records as record labels.

            Background and release

            • "Jepsen announced that the album, titled The Loneliest Time, will be released on October 21, 2022": As you are talking about a past event, "will be" should be "would be".
            • "Jepsen wrote "Talking to Yourself" alongside songwriter Simon Wilcox, and Benjamin Berger and Ryan Rabin from its production team Captain Cuts": See point above about the "its".
            • "School Boy and Interscope Records released...": See point above about introducing them.
            • "...along with a music video, as the album's third single, three days later": What are all these commas for?

            Composition and lyrics

            • "...Eli Heisler, Berger and Wilcox programmed it...": Shouldn't this comma be a semicolon?
            • "pulsating, beat-driven": Why are there quotation marks? Is this someone speaking (if so, source the statement), or just scare quotes?

            Critical reception

            • "Consequence picked the track as...": Consequence should be in italics.

            Images

            Can you add {{cc-by-2.0}}

            {{FlickreviewR|status=passed|author=Raph_PH|sourceurl=https://flickr.com/photos/69880995@N04/48986111926|archive=|reviewdate=2020-03-15 14:26:33|reviewlicense=cc-by-2.0|reviewer=FlickreviewR 2}} to File:Carly Rae Jepsen Primavera19 -146 (48986111926) (cropped).jpg?

            :Unfortunately, my attempt to add this to the file page was thwarted by a message saying "You do not have the permission to review images, this edit was therefore disabled". Everything else addressed upto here!--NØ 04:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

            ::How strange; it did not let me to so either. Oh well. In any case, I will pass this GA nomination. It was wonderful working with you again on a quality article, and I hope to see more from you soon. Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)