Talk:Tameside/GA1

GA Review

:This review is transcluded from Talk:Tameside/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{#if:Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):|


Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):|}}

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  2. :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. :: {{#if:Minor issues, mentioned below|Minor issues, mentioned below|}}
  4. :B. MoS compliance: {{GAList/check|y}}
  5. :: {{#if:remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers|remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers|}}
  6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
  7. :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|y}}
  8. :: {{#if:||}}
  9. :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
  10. :: {{#if:||}}
  11. :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. :: {{#if:||}}
  13. Is it broad in its coverage?
  14. :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. :: {{#if:||}}
  16. :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
  17. :: {{#if:||}}
  18. Is it neutral?
  19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  20. :: {{#if:||}}
  21. Is it stable?
  22. : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
  23. :: {{#if:||}}
  24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
  25. :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
  26. :: {{#if:||}}
  27. :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
  28. :: {{#if:||}}
  29. Overall:
  30. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  31. :: {{#if:GA pass. Well done.|GA pass. Well done.|}}

Minor changes that I would make:

  • "Since then the area has been administered by Tameside Borough Council, which has been judged by the Audit Commission to be "performing strongly"." Just remove this. It's unnecessary.
  • "an earthwork" What's an earthwork?

Other than that, great work. -epicAdam(talk) 02:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)