Talk:Tameside/GA1
GA Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
{{#if:Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):|
Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):|}}
- Is it reasonably well written?
- :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:Minor issues, mentioned below|Minor issues, mentioned below|}}
- :B. MoS compliance: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers|remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers|}}
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it neutral?
- :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it stable?
- : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Overall:
- :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:GA pass. Well done.|GA pass. Well done.|}}
Minor changes that I would make:
- "Since then the area has been administered by Tameside Borough Council, which has been judged by the Audit Commission to be "performing strongly"." Just remove this. It's unnecessary.
- "an earthwork" What's an earthwork?
Other than that, great work. -epicAdam(talk) 02:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)