Talk:Transition Korea#rfc C6D824A

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1637704880}}

Should we include pragmatism amoung the parties ideologies? It does not seem to be listed on list of political ideologies. Helper201 (talk) 21:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

:It may not be an ideology per se, however like many ideologies it is a philosophy, and one that has relevance for politics. Besides, many things that are not ideologies or even philosophies tend to be listed in ideology-sections, neither decentralization nor basic income are technically ideologies either, yet are often listed in the infoboxes of parties where these are relevant! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{u|Helper201}}, Do you have a reliable source for that? If so it should be no big deal to include? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

::{{u|CaptainEek}}, for what exactly? That pragmatism is or is not a political ideology? No, I have neither. I'm not trying to push in any one direction, just opening up the question of whether it should be included. I also don't know of the validity of the current source as I can't read Korean. What is regarded as pragmatic and what is not seems very variable upon personal judgement/views, i.e. I'm not sure if something could factually and concretely be regarded as pragmatic; but that's aside from the question of whether or not it constitutes as a political ideology or not. Helper201 (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

:::I think there has been some confusion on your end that I have just realised, {{u|CaptainEek}}. Pragmatism is already included in the infobox as an ideology of the party, my question is whether or not it should be there based upon whether or not it is a political ideology. Helper201 (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

::::{{u|Helper201}}, I would say that pragmatism is indeed a political ideology. Is it appropriate to include here? If one of the sources says as much about the group, then we should say the same. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

• Comment What reliable sources state that "pragmatism" is one of the organization's ideologies? If a substantial number of them say that, we should too. If not, we shouldn't. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
• The biggest problem with this party is that it does not advocate any particular ideology other than political pragmatism.--Storm598 (talk) 02:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

:*Comment reply {{U|Seraphimblade}}, according to the main page citation number 1. I can't read Korean so I have not tried to verify this, though perhaps a translator tool may suffice, but ideally it would be useful if someone that can read Korean could verify it. Helper201 (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

• ::Yes, if there are any Korean speakers who can read it, that would be much more helpful than trying to rely on machine translation. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)