Talk:Tupolev Tu-85/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Tupolev Tu-85/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-85/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

{{#if:{{{overcom|}}}|

---

{{{overcom}}}|}}

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. : prose: {{GAList/check|y}} (MoS): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. :: {{#if:{{{1com|}}}|{{{1com}}}|}}
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
5. : {{GAList/check|y}}
6. :: {{#if:{{{2com|}}}|{{{2com}}}|}}
7. It is broad in its coverage.
8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
9. :: {{#if:{{{3com|}}}|{{{3com}}}|}}
10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. :: {{#if:{{{4com|}}}|{{{4com}}}|}}
13. It is stable.
14. :No edit wars etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. :: {{#if:{{{5com|}}}|{{{5com}}}|}}
16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
18. :: {{#if:{{{6com|}}}|{{{6com}}}|}}
19. Overall:
20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
21. :: {{#if:{{{7com|}}}|{{{7com}}}|}}