Talk:Vorbunker/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Vorbunker/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Vorbunker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 23:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"
style="vertical-align:top;"

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|y|

  • wl Bormann in the body {{done}}
  • wl :Helmuth Weidling and, for context, explain that he was the last commander of the Berlin Defence Area{{done}}
  • the name of the formation was LVI Panzer Corps, which sort of gets rid of the need to point out it was German{{done}}
  • explain who Krebs and Burgdorf were{{done}}
  • Can you please check Beevor about the Goebbels' deaths? I think there is a bit more detail there. Aren't there several versions of how their deaths occurred? Given they lived in the Vorbunker, it is worth providing the couple of versions of their demise (just like that of their children) {{done}} Yes, there are several versions which I have added with links and cites. Kierzek (talk) 03:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  • that's it really, not much to address. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 07:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|y|

  • Bormann is mentioned in the lead, but doesn't appear in the body of the article. He is of interest, but WP:LEAD is clear that anything in the lead needs to be mentioned in the body with citation. {{done}} Copy edit addition with cite as to Martin Bormann added to body. Kierzek (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

{{GATable/item|2a|y|

  • After the Battle needs its OCLC added, available from Worldcat. *I have the ISSN number. ISSN: 0306-154X. Want me to add that? Kierzek (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Sure, any numerical identifier is fine. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 02:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC). {{done}} Kierzek (talk) 02:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC); OCLC now added, thanks to Diannaa. Kierzek (talk) 03:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|y|

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|4|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|5|y|

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|y|

}}

{{GATable/item|7|y|Placing on hold for seven days for a few prose points to be addressed Passing, well done! Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 06:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

}}