Talk:Wash Us in the Blood/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Wash Us in the Blood/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Wash Us in the Blood/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I will review this soon.The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|The Ultimate Boss}} Any updates on this? --K. Peake 20:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

1. Well written:
2. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; {{GAList/check|pass}}
3. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. {{GAList/check|pass}}
4. Verifiable with no original research:
5. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; {{GAList/check|fail}}

• wikilink for Triple J on ref 16
• remove wikilink for Triple J on ref 18

:*{{Done}} for the above --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

1. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; {{GAList/check|pass}}
2. it contains no original research; and {{GAList/check|pass}}
3. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. {{GAList/check|pass}}
4. Broad in its coverage:
5. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and{{GAList/check|pass}}
6. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).{{GAList/check|fail}}

• How is "Based on the platform's community guidelines, the video was age-restricted" important to the article?

:*It was reported on West's official Vevo channel, doesn't this qualify notability? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

1. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.{{GAList/check|pass}}
2. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.{{GAList/check|pass}}
3. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
4. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and{{GAList/check|pass}}
5. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.{{GAList/check|pass}}
6. Overall

{{GAList/check|hold}}

:{{u|The Ultimate Boss}} replied, are you ready to pass this now? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

::{{u|Kyle Peake}} yes it is! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)