Talk:William Napier (astronomer)

Removal of deletion proposal

Napier is distinguished both as an academic (he is a major figure in the neo-catastrophism movement of astronomy), and as an author (his books are best-sellers). As such, an entry is likely to be sought and welcomed by a significant number of Wikipedia users.

I think shattered Icon and Splintered Icon are the same book with different publication titles. Can anyone confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.9.182.43 (talk) 02:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

:More on his obviously important research needed. Said: Rursus (☻) 15:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Dear Prof. Napier, I corresponded with you and Victor Clube on possible causes of the KTB extinction event some 35 years ago,

I'm sure you don't recall, but I do! Anyway, I've an interesting thought on the possible origin of hypothetical Planet Nine,

(Caltech. astronomy) which posits the capture of Planet Nine, as shown by its great solar distance and high eccentricity

of orbit, to be extrasolar in origin, and likely a local exo-planet captured from some passing star. I propose that this

Planet Nine (if telescope found) should be in a new class of planets, 'solar exo-planets' by the same capture process

you and Clube proposed for the interchange of comets with passing giant molecular clouds in the 1980s. You should publish

this concept before someone else finds it.

2602:306:C46E:C900:D17:A0DA:F386:4475 (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Paul Ewbank

from Univ. of Miami (RSMAS)

email: bengalpride2@outlook.com

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Napier (astronomer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928110947/http://www.astrobiology.cf.ac.uk/staff.html to http://www.astrobiology.cf.ac.uk/staff.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)