Talk:Woodrow Wilson/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: MEisSCAMMER (talk · contribs) 23:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Starting review:
- Well written: {{tick}} (applause ensues) Good job! Wow, there isn't much to say here, a third grader could probably follow it.
- Verifiable: {{tick}} 361 sources should be good enough for everyone.
Only one {{t|citation needed}} tag, should be easy to fixfixed it. - Broad: {{tick}} Yes, nothing to say here...
- Neutral: {{tick}} No POV issues.
- Stable: {{tick}} No problems here, this article is as stable as... as... as Woodrow Wilson! [grins]
- Illustrated: {{tick}} Lots and lots of pictures.
Overall, I'm surprised this isn't a featured article already, it's definitely possible in the future. Warren Harding, the next president, is one. {{smiley}} MEisSCAMMER(talk)Hello! 22:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This assessment was reversed by Buidhe in Special:Diff/1010463566. CMD (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
This article was not reviewed sufficiently at all, and is still under review. The reviewer did not make a thorough review at all, and judging from contributions, is very new to Wikipedia. Biographies of significant persons need to be reviewed significantly more. I will remove the erroneously-placed GA template, and if someone reverts it, that is gaming the system and I will probably have to take it to AN. As for now, if there is an experienced editor who knows the good article criteria and wants to review the article, that would be great. Wretchskull (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)