Template:Did you know nominations/Antennacanthopodia

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

{{DYK tools|nominator=RenaMoonn}}

{{DYK header|Antennacanthopodia}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Antennacanthopodia|Antennacanthopodia}}

{{main page image/DYK| image=File:Antennacanthopodia.jpg|caption=Reconstruction of Antennacanthopodia based on fossil material. The color is speculative.}}

• ... that velvet worms had an ancient relative with two pairs of antennae?

{{smalldiv|1=

• Source: Ou et al.}}
• Reviewed:

{{smalldiv|1=Improved to Good Article status by {{user0|RenaMoonn}}.

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.}}

RenaMoonn (talk) 20:12, 20 March 2025 (UTC).

• 16px Yep, all good here. Article was promoted to GA status within the 7 day-period leading up to the DYK nom. Hook is very interesting to me. I think because of the GA nature of the article, perhaps multiple ALT hooks can be created but the original hook here definitely works. Earwig shows a very low copyvio possibility (1.0%). Article is properly sourced, as is the hook. Article is long enough. Honestly, this file could even be used to make the hook one supported by an image (I will leave that up to the promoter). Should be good to go. Soulbust (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)