Template:Did you know nominations/History of philosophy

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

{{DYK conditions}}

{{DYK header|History of philosophy}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=History of philosophy|History of philosophy}}

• ... that the history of philosophy in the Western world originated in Ancient Greece with the Presocratics and their inquiry into the fundamental nature of the cosmos? Source: {{sfn|Graham|2023|loc=lead section, 1. Presocratic Thought}}{{sfn|Duignan|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=MfBS-RXJ5RsC&pg=PA9 9–11]}}
• ALT1: ... that the history of philosophy in India is characterized by its combined interest in the nature of reality, the ways of arriving at knowledge, and the spiritual question of how to reach enlightenment? Source: {{sfn|Smart|2008|p=3}}{{sfn|Grayling|2019|loc=Indian Philosophy}}
• ALT2: ... that in the history of philosophy in China, the three main schools are Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism? Source: {{sfn|Smart|2008|pp=70–71}}{{sfn|Zhang|2021|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=iGwrEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA751 751]}}
• Reviewed: Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Ashley_Graham_(Resident_Evil)
• Comment:

References

{{reflist}}

Sources

• {{cite book |editor1-last=Duignan |editor1-first=Brian |title=Ancient Philosophy: From 600 BCE to 500 CE |date=15 August 2010 |publisher=The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc |isbn=978-1-61530-141-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MfBS-RXJ5RsC |language=en}}
• {{cite web |last1=Graham |first1=Jacob N. |title=Ancient Greek Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/ancient-greek-philosophy/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=25 May 2023 |date=2023}}
• {{cite book |last1=Grayling |first1=A. C. |title=The History of Philosophy |date=20 June 2019 |publisher=Penguin UK |isbn=978-0-241-98086-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bDJwDwAAQBAJ |language=en}}
• {{cite book |last1=Smart |first1=Ninian |title=World philosophies |date=2008 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=978-0-415-41188-2 |edition=Rev. 2nd}}
• {{cite book |last1=Zhang |first1=Xuezhi |title=History of Chinese Philosophy in the Ming Dynasty |date=26 April 2021 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-981-15-8963-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iGwrEAAAQBAJ |language=en}}

Created by {{user0|Phlsph7}}. Self-nominated at 07:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/History of philosophy; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Comment Phlsph7 this article is not eligible for DYK as it was not created or expanded five fold in the last 7 days, see WP:DYKCRIT. You could bring the article to good article status and renominate it then. TSventon (talk) 08:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
• :{{ping|TSventon}} Thanks for the prompt response and the explanation. The article was a redirect for over 7 years. The redirect was replaced yesterday by an article, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_philosophy&diff=prev&oldid=1161668891 this diff]. It might be a little confusing because the history of the draft was merged into the article history. I wasn't sure whether to select "created" or "expanded fivefold" in such a case. But I think it should be eligible. Please let me know if there is a misunderstanding on my side. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
• :[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_philosophy&oldid=968727181 this] is the version prior to my changes. The subsequent changes in the history were imported from the draft yesterday. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

:::Thank you for the clarification, I have changed my review to a comment. This is an unusual situation, so it would have been helpful to include the explanation in the nomination. TSventon (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

::::That's a good point. I'll keep that in mind for future nominations. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)