Template:Did you know nominations/Joint Operations Command (Japan)

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2025|}}

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Joint Operations Command (Japan)|Joint Operations Command (Japan)}}

... that the Joint Operations Command was created based on lessons learned from the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami?

{{smalldiv|1=

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20250316172100/https://thediplomat.com/2025/03/japan-appoints-first-chief-of-new-joint-operations-command/}}
ALT1: ... that the Joint Operations Command was created based on recommendations from the Defense Buildup Plan in 2022 to creating a joint headquarters? Source: https://www.mod.go.jp/j/policy/agenda/guideline/plan/pdf/program_en.pdf --> page 8
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Parakiore Recreation and Sport Centre
Comment: For the 1st hook, I can't afford to expand some more due to character restrictions. Open to other hook suggestions.

{{smalldiv|1=Created by {{user0|Ominae}}.

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.}}

Ominae (talk) 13:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC).

{{Reviewing}} Flibirigit (talk) 01:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

{{DYK checklist

|newness = y

|length = y

|sourced = y

|neutral = y

|plagiarismfree = y

|hookcited = ?

|hookinterest = y

|picfree = NA

|qpq = y

|status = ?

|comments = I formatted the hooks to pipelink Japan, and remove the unnecessary acronym DBP. The article was created on March 24, and nominated the same day for DYK. Length and sourcing are adequate. The article is neutral in tone. No plagiarism was detected despite Earwig highlights proper nouns and quotes which are not violations. Both hooks are interesting, but ALT0 is stronger. ALT0 is supported by two sentences in the article, both of which need a citation directly at their ends, as per WP:DYKHFC. ALT1 is verified by the cited source. The logo used in the article is in the public domain on the Commons. The QPQ requirement is complete.

|sign = Flibirigit (talk) 01:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

}}

:{{reply to|Flibirigit}} - Added citation/s for concerning sentences. Let me know if I missed anything. Ominae (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

::16px Sourcing for the hooks is now adequate, with both hooks verified. Flibirigit (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

::: Thanks {{reply to|Flibirigit}}. Ominae (talk) 03:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

|}}