Template:Did you know nominations/Tatannuaq

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2024|}}

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 03:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

{{DYK conditions}}

{{DYK header|Tatannuaq}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Tatannuaq|Tatannuaq}}

Created by {{user0|Generalissima}}. Self-nominated at 04:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Tatannuaq; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

{{DYK checklist

|newness = y

|length = y

|eligibilityother =

|sourced = y

|neutral = y

|plagiarismfree = y

|policyother =

|hookcited = y

|hookinterest = y

|hookother =

|qpq = y

|status = ?

}}

  • Hello {{ping|Generalissima}} This is my first DYK review so per guideline, 16px second opinion is needed. In any case, the article is interesting to read through, well-sourced, neutral, has no copyright problems; though [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Tatannuaq Earwig] returns some similar formulations that you may want to rewrite to lower the percentage :). The hook is interesting, cited, and I suggest linking to C. augustinus itself in the hook,
  • :ALT1: ... that a species of butterfly was named in honor of an Inuit interpreter?
  • I have 16px one question regarding naming conventions, though:
  • In all the sources I was able to access, his name is spelled "Tattannoeuck". I see that only ref [2], which I do not have access to, has "Tatannuaq" in the title. Is there a reason not to use the more prevalent spelling in the sources cited?
  • AGF sources: [2] [7] [McGoogan]
  • Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 21:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC); edited 21:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • {{yo|Lol1VNIO}} Good idea on linking. The reason I used Tatannuaq is due to its use of modern Inuktitut spelling conventions and modern sources; see his mention in the Historical Dictionary of the Inuit (2013), a Nunatsiaq news article (https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/taissumani_july_7_1826_-_tatannuaq_negotiates_detente_between_john_franklin/) or the mention at pg. 3216 of the Nunavut Assembly's Hansard (https://assembly.nu.ca/sites/default/files/Hansard_20121101.pdf). It just so happens that most of the best sources on this topic are older, and don't use the spelling conventions of most modern published sources. Generalissima (talk) 22:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • {{ping|Generalissima}} Makes sense to me (DYKtick)! 16px Second opinion still needed because I am new. Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 22:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
  • 16px Gtg, no issues that I can see. AryKun (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
|}}

{{Pending DYK biographies}}