Template:Did you know nominations/Technical geography

{{DYKsubpage

|monthyear=April 2025

|passed=

|2=

{{DYK tools|nominator=GeogSage}}

{{DYK header|Technical geography}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Technical geography|Technical geography}}

{{smalldiv|1=

  • Source: {{cite journal |last1=Haidu |first1=Ionel |title=What is Technical Geography – a letter from the editor |journal=Geographia Technica |date=2016 |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=1–5 |doi=10.21163/GT_2016.111.01|doi-access=free |bibcode=2016GeogT..11....1H }}{{cite book |last1=Sala |first1=Maria |title=Geography Volume I |date=2009 |publisher=EOLSS UNESCO |location=Oxford, United Kingdom |pages = 2, 3, 8, 32, 109|isbn=978-1-84826-960-6 |edition=1}}{{cite book |last1=Ormeling |first1=Ferjan |title=GEOGRAPHY – Vol. II: Technical Geography Core concepts in the mapping sciences |year=2009 |publisher=EOLSS UNESCO |isbn=978-1-84826-960-6 |pages=482 |url=https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c01/e6-14-04.pdf}}}}
  • ALT1: ... that technical geography studies the application of technologies like Geographic information systems, cartography, and remote sensing? Source:
  • Reviewed:

{{smalldiv|1=Improved to Good Article status by {{user0|GeogSage}}.

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.}}

GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 02:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC).

{{cot|title=Sources}}

{{reflist-talk}}

{{cob}}

  • Comment: {{ping|GeogSage}} I can’t speak for others, but I don’t find either of your hooks interesting. Try to come up with others. Viriditas (talk) 01:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: {{ping|GeogSage}} I'm seeing a lot of good, potential hooks in the article. Your section on "Early history and etymology" has quite a few. The material about Eratosthenes, the Ptolemaic tradition, and Islamic geographers could make separate hooks or could even be combined into one hook. Viriditas (talk) 01:43, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
  • {{ping|Viriditas}}: Thanks for the feedback. This is my first attempt, and I've been trying to think of good ways to respond. Would I put a new one in the comments here, or edit the proposal? GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 02:20, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
  • {{ping|GeogSage}} Brief response is best. No need to overthink it. Be yourself. Viriditas (talk) 02:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

}}