United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

{{Use Oxford spelling|date=January 2019}}{{Infobox Treaty

| name = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

| image = UNCLOS logo.svg

| image_size = 120px

| caption = Logo of the Convention

| date_drafted =

| date_signed = 10 December 1982

| location_signed = Montego Bay, Jamaica

| date_sealed =

| date_effective = 16 November 1994{{cite web |url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm |title=The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (A historical perspective) |publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea |access-date=30 April 2009 |archive-date=15 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220915020937/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm |url-status=live }}

| condition_effective = 60 ratifications

| date_expiration =

| signatories =157{{cite web|url=https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en|title=United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea|access-date=1 December 2013|publisher=United Nations Treaty Series|archive-date=18 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518174934/https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en|url-status=live}}

| parties = 170{{cite web| url=https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm| title=Chronological lists of ratifications of, accessions and successions to the Convention and the related Agreements| publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea| date=8 January 2010| access-date=24 February 2010| archive-date=14 April 2009| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090414043900/http://www.un.org/depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm| url-status=live}}

| depositor = Secretary-General of the United Nations

| languages = Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish

| website =

| wikisource = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

}}

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), also called the Law of the Sea Convention or the Law of the Sea Treaty, is an international treaty that establishes a legal framework for all marine and maritime activities. {{As of|2024|10}}, 169 sovereign states and the European Union are parties,{{Cite web |title=United Nations Treaty Collection |url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-6&chapter=21&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en |access-date=2024-07-29 |website=treaties.un.org |language=EN}} including all major powers except the United States.

The convention resulted from the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III), which took place between 1973 and 1982. UNCLOS replaced the four treaties of the 1958 Convention on the High Seas. UNCLOS came into force in 1994, a year after Guyana became the 60th nation to ratify the treaty. In 2023, agreement was reached on a High Seas Treaty to be added as an instrument of the convention, to protect ocean life in international waters. This would provide measures including Marine Protected Areas and environmental impact assessments.

While the secretary-general of the United Nations receives instruments of ratification and accession and the UN provides support for meetings of states party to the convention, the United Nations Secretariat has no direct operational role in the implementation of the convention. A UN specialized agency, the International Maritime Organization, does play a role, however, as do other bodies such as the International Whaling Commission and the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which was established by the convention itself.

Background

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea replaces the older "freedom of the seas" concept, dating from the 17th century. According to this concept, national rights were limited to a specified belt of water extending from a nation's coastlines, usually {{convert|3|nmi|km mi}} (three-mile limit), according to the "cannon shot" rule developed by the Dutch jurist Cornelius van Bynkershoek.{{cite book|last1=Akashi|first1=Kinji|title=Cornelius Van Bynkershoek: His Role in the History of International Law|date=2 October 1998|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|isbn=978-9041105998|page=150|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8Pp--yPYL58C&q=Cornelius%20van%20Bynkershoek%20cannon&pg=PA150|access-date=12 July 2016|ref=Akashi-Bynkershoek|archive-date=10 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230310133150/https://books.google.com/books?id=8Pp--yPYL58C&q=Cornelius%20van%20Bynkershoek%20cannon&pg=PA150|url-status=live}} All waters beyond national boundaries were considered international waters: free to all nations, but belonging to none of them (the mare liberum principle propounded by Hugo Grotius).{{Cite web|url=http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/grotius-the-freedom-of-the-seas-latin-and-english-version-magoffin-trans|title=The Freedom of the Seas (Latin and English version, Magoffin trans.) – Online Library of Liberty|website=oll.libertyfund.org|access-date=27 January 2017|archive-date=16 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116115753/https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/grotius-the-freedom-of-the-seas-latin-and-english-version-magoffin-trans|url-status=live}}

In the early 20th century, some nations expressed their desire to extend national claims: to include mineral resources, to protect fish stocks, and to provide the means to enforce pollution controls. The League of Nations called a 1930 conference at The Hague, but no agreements resulted.{{cite web |title=Chapter 1: International Law, Adoption of the Law of the Sea Convention – Law of the Sea |url=https://sites.tufts.edu/lawofthesea/chapter-one |website=Law of the Sea: A Policy Primer |publisher=The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University |access-date=14 May 2019 |archive-date=14 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414230030/https://sites.tufts.edu/lawofthesea/chapter-one/ |url-status=live }} Using the customary international-law principle of a nation's right to protect its natural resources, President Harry S. Truman in 1945 extended United States control to all the natural resources of its continental shelf. Other nations were quick to follow suit. Between 1946 and 1950, Chile, Peru, and Ecuador extended their rights to a distance of {{convert|200|nmi|km mi}} to cover their Humboldt Current fishing grounds. Other nations extended their territorial seas to {{convert|12|nmi|km mi}}.{{Cite book|last=Marley|first=David|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/699488885|title=Modern piracy : a reference handbook|date=2011|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-434-4|location=Santa Barbara, Calif.|oclc=699488885|access-date=30 May 2020|archive-date=20 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210520150139/https://www.worldcat.org/title/modern-piracy-a-reference-handbook/oclc/699488885|url-status=live}}

By 1967, only 25 nations still used the old three nautical mile limit,{{Cite web|title=Three Mile Limit|url=http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201104134916/http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 November 2020|website=www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk|access-date=2020-05-30}} while 66 nations had set a {{convert|12|nmi|km|adj=on}} territorial limit{{Cite web|title=Three mile limit|url=http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|access-date=30 May 2020|archive-date=25 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225090218/http://www.offshoreradiomuseum.co.uk/page965.html|url-status=live}} and eight had set a {{convert|200|nmi|km|adj=on}} limit. {{As of|2011|07|15}}, only Jordan still uses the {{convert|3|mi|km|adj=on}} limit.{{Cite web |last=IILSS |date=2021-04-25 |title=Table of claims to maritime jurisdiction (as at 15 July 2011)/maritime spaces of countries |url=http://iilss.net/table-of-claims-to-maritime-jurisdiction-as-at-15-july-2011-maritime-spaces-of-countries/ |access-date=2022-04-21 |website=IILSS-International institute for Law of the Sea Studies |language=en-US |archive-date=6 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006051814/https://iilss.net/table-of-claims-to-maritime-jurisdiction-as-at-15-july-2011-maritime-spaces-of-countries/ |url-status=live }} That limit is also used in certain Australian islands, an area of Belize, some Japanese straits, certain areas of Papua New Guinea, and a few British Overseas Territories, such as Gibraltar.{{Cite book|chapter=transit regions of the world|doi=10.1163/9789004327115_006|chapter-url=https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004327115/B9789004327115_006.xml|title=Navigational Restrictions within the New LOS Context|year=2017|pages=143–173|isbn=9789004327108|last1=Alexander|first1=Lewis M.|editor-first1=J. Ashley |editor-last1=Roach |access-date=25 September 2020|archive-date=17 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417134546/https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004327115/B9789004327115_006.xml|url-status=live}}

UNCLOS does not deal with matters of territorial disputes or to resolve issues of sovereignty, as that field is governed by rules of customary international law on the acquisition and loss of territory.{{Cite web|title=Chagos: A boundary dispute tips over a sovereignty ruling|url=https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/chagos-boundary-dispute-tips-over-sovereignty-ruling|access-date=2021-10-10|website=www.lowyinstitute.org|language=en|archive-date=10 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211010114421/https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/chagos-boundary-dispute-tips-over-sovereignty-ruling|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|date=2021-05-06|title=Professor Robert Beckman on the Role of UNCLOS in Maritime Disputes|url=https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/05/06/professor-robert-beckman-on-the-role-of-unclos-in-maritime-disputes/|access-date=2021-10-10|website=Georgetown Journal of International Affairs|language=en-US|archive-date=10 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211010114411/https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/05/06/professor-robert-beckman-on-the-role-of-unclos-in-maritime-disputes/|url-status=live}}

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14 has a target regarding conservative and sustainable use of oceans and their resources in line with UNCLOS legal framework.{{Cite web |title=Goal 14 targets |url=https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-14-life-below-water/targets.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200930060036/https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-14-life-below-water/targets.html |archive-date=30 September 2020 |access-date=2020-09-24 |website=UNDP |language=en}}

UNCLOS I

Breadth claim	Number of states
class="wikitable" align="right" style="margin-left:10px" \|+ Territorial waters claims by coastal states in 1960{{cite journal \|url=https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf \|title=The Seizure and Recovery of the S.S. Mayaguez: Legal Analysis of United States Claims, Part 1 \|author=Major Thomas E. Behuniak \|journal=Military Law Review \|volume=82 \|publisher=Department of the Army \|date=Fall 1978 \|issn=0026-4040 \|pages=114–121 \|access-date=21 July 2014 \|url-status=dead \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161228203240/https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/DOCLIBS/MILITARYLAWREVIEW.NSF/20a66345129fe3d885256e5b00571830/b3197adca4437e4d85256e5b0057ee6a/$FILE/MLR%2027-100-82%2019781001.pdf \|archive-date=28 December 2016 \|df=dmy-all }}
3-mile limit	26
4-mile limit	3
5-mile limit	1
6-mile limit	16
9-mile limit	1
10-mile limit	2
12-mile limit	34
More than 12-miles	9
Unspecified	11

In 1958, the United Nations held its first Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS I) at Geneva, Switzerland. UNCLOS I{{Cite web |url=http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/8_1.htm |title=UNCLOS I |access-date=16 October 2013 |archive-date=17 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017052206/http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/8_1.htm |url-status=live }} resulted in four treaties concluded in 1958:

Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, entry into force: 10 September 1964
Convention on the Continental Shelf, entry into force: 10 June 1964
Convention on the High Seas, entry into force: 30 September 1962
Convention on Fishing and Conservation of Living Resources of the High Seas, entry into force: 20 March 1966

Although UNCLOS I was considered a success, it left open the important issue of breadth of territorial waters.

UNCLOS II

In 1960, the United Nations held the second Conference on the Law of the Sea ("UNCLOS II"); however, the six-week Geneva conference did not result in any new agreements. Generally speaking, developing nations and third world countries participated only as clients, allies, or dependents of the United States or the Soviet Union, with no significant voice of their own.

UNCLOS III

File:Maritime Zones under International Law.png

The issue of varying claims of territorial waters was raised in the UN in 1967 by Arvid Pardo of Malta, and in 1973 the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea convened in New York. In an attempt to reduce the possibility of groups of nation-states dominating the negotiations, the conference used a consensus process rather than majority vote. With more than 160 nations participating, the conference lasted until 1982. The resulting convention came into force on 16 November 1994, one year after the 60th state, Guyana, ratified the treaty.

The convention introduced a number of provisions. The most significant issues covered were setting limits, navigation, archipelagic status and transit regimes, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), continental shelf jurisdiction, deep seabed mining, the exploitation regime, protection of the marine environment, scientific research, and settlement of disputes.

The convention set the limit of various areas, measured from a carefully defined baseline. (Normally, a sea baseline follows the low-water line, but when the coastline is deeply indented, has fringing islands or is highly unstable, straight baselines may be used.) The areas are as follows:

Internal waters: Covers all water and waterways on the landward side of the baseline. The coastal state is free to set laws, regulate use, and use any resource. Foreign vessels have no right of passage within internal waters. A vessel in the high seas assumes jurisdiction under the internal laws of its flag state.
Archipelagic waters: The convention set the definition of "Archipelagic States" in Part IV, which also defines how the state can draw its territorial borders. A baseline is drawn between the outermost points of the outermost islands, subject to these points being sufficiently close to one another. All waters inside this baseline are designated "Archipelagic Waters". The state has sovereignty over these waters to the extent it has over internal waters, but subject to existing rights including traditional fishing rights of immediately adjacent states.{{cite web |title=UNCLOS 3 Article 51 |url=https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210421035346/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm |archive-date=21 April 2021 |access-date=29 March 2016 |publisher=United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea}} Foreign vessels have right of innocent passage through archipelagic waters, but archipelagic states may limit innocent passage to designated sea lanes.
Territorial sea: Up to {{convert|12|nmi|km mi|abbr=off}} from the baseline, the coastal state is free to set laws, regulate the use, and use any resource; in essence, the coastal State enjoys Sovereign rights and sovereign jurisdiction within its territorial sea. Vessels were given the right of innocent passage through any territorial sea, with strategic straits allowing the passage of military craft as transit passage, in that naval vessels are allowed to maintain postures that would be illegal in the territorial sea. "Innocent passage" is defined by the convention as passing through waters in an expeditious and continuous manner, which is not "prejudicial to the peace, good order or the security" of the coastal state. Fishing, polluting, weapons practice, and spying are not "innocent", and submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flag. Nations can also temporarily suspend innocent passage in specific areas of their territorial sea, if doing so is essential for the protection of their security.
Contiguous zone: Beyond the {{convert|12|nmi|km|adj=on}} limit, there is a further {{convert|12|nmi|km}} from the territorial sea baseline limit, the contiguous zone. Here a state can continue to enforce laws in four specific areas (customs, taxation, immigration, and pollution) if the infringement started or is about to occur within the state's territory or territorial waters.{{cite web|title=SECTION 4. CONTIGUOUS ZONE, Article 33|url=https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm|work=UNCLOS PART II – TERRITORIAL SEA AND CONTIGUOUS ZONE|publisher=United Nations|access-date=19 January 2012|archive-date=23 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210523020808/https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm|url-status=live}} This makes the contiguous zone a hot pursuit area.
Exclusive economic zones (EEZs): These extend {{convert|200|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} from the baseline. Within this area, the coastal nation has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources. In casual use, the term may include the territorial sea and even the continental shelf. The EEZs were introduced to halt the increasingly heated clashes over fishing rights, although oil was also becoming important. The success of an offshore oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico in 1947 was soon repeated elsewhere in the world, and by 1970 it was technically feasible to operate in waters {{convert|4000|m}} deep. Foreign nations have the freedom of navigation and overflight, subject to the regulation of the coastal states. Foreign states may also lay submarine pipes and cables.
Continental shelf: The continental shelf is defined as the natural prolongation of the land territory to the continental margin's outer edge, or {{convert|200|nmi|km}} from the coastal state's baseline, whichever is greater. A state's continental shelf may exceed {{convert|200|nmi|km}} until the natural prolongation ends. However, it may never exceed {{convert|350|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} from the baseline; nor may it exceed {{convert|100|nmi|km mi|abbr=on}} beyond the {{convert|2500|m}} isobath (the line connecting the depth of 2 500 m). Coastal states have the right to harvest mineral and non-living material in the subsoil of their continental shelf, to the exclusion of others. Coastal states also have exclusive control over living resources "attached" to the continental shelf, but not to creatures living in the water column beyond the exclusive economic zone.

The area outside these areas is referred to as the "high seas" or simply "the Area".{{cite web |title=Documents and Publications |url=http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents |publisher=International Seabed Authority|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513045513/http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents |archive-date=13 May 2008 }}{{cite journal |last1=Jon Copley |title=Deep-sea mining is making the seabed the hottest real estate on Earth |journal=New Scientist |date=Nov 7, 2020 |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24833070-700-deep-sea-mining-is-making-the-seabed-the-hottest-real-estate-on-earth/ |access-date=8 November 2020 |archive-date=28 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210428214041/https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24833070-700-deep-sea-mining-is-making-the-seabed-the-hottest-real-estate-on-earth/ |url-status=live }}

Aside from its provisions defining ocean boundaries, the convention establishes general obligations for safeguarding the marine environment and protecting freedom of scientific research on the high seas, and also creates an innovative legal regime for controlling mineral resource exploitation in deep seabed areas beyond national jurisdiction, through an International Seabed Authority and the common heritage of mankind principle.Jennifer Frakes, The Common Heritage of Mankind Principle and the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica: Will Developed and Developing Nations Reach a Compromise? Wisconsin International Law Journal. 2003; 21:409

The convention also established the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Hamburg, Germany.{{Cite web |title=International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Tribunal |url=https://www.itlos.org/en/main/the-tribunal/the-tribunal/ |access-date=2024-07-29 |website=www.itlos.org}}

Landlocked states are given a right of access to and from the sea, without taxation of traffic through transit states.This principle was developed in the Convention on Transit Trade of Land-locked States.

Part XI and the 1994 Agreement

Part XI of the convention provides for a regime relating to minerals on the seabed outside any state's territorial waters or exclusive economic zones (EEZ). It establishes an International Seabed Authority (ISA) to authorize seabed exploration and mining and collect and distribute the seabed mining royalty.

The United States objected to the provisions of Part XI of the convention on several grounds, arguing that the treaty was unfavorable to American economic and security interests. Due to Part XI, the United States refused to ratify the UNCLOS, although it expressed agreement with the remaining provisions of the convention.

From 1982 to 1990, the United States accepted all but Part XI as customary international law, while attempting to establish an alternative regime for exploitation of the minerals of the deep seabed. An agreement was made with other seabed mining nations and licenses were granted to four international consortia. Concurrently, the Preparatory Commission was established to prepare for the eventual coming into force of the convention-recognized claims by applicants, sponsored by signatories of the convention. Overlaps between the two groups were resolved, but a decline in the demand for minerals from the seabed made the seabed regime significantly less relevant. In addition, the decline of communism in the late 1980s removed much of the support for some of the more contentious Part XI provisions.{{citation needed|date=December 2020}}

In 1990, consultations began between signatories and non-signatories (including the United States) over the possibility of modifying the convention to allow the industrialized countries to join the convention. The resulting 1994 Agreement on Implementation was adopted as a binding international convention. It mandated that key articles, including those on limitation of seabed production and mandatory technology transfer, would not be applied, that the United States, if it became a member, would be guaranteed a seat on the Council of the International Seabed Authority, and finally, that voting would be done in groups, with each group able to block decisions on substantive matters. The 1994 Agreement also established a Finance Committee that would originate the financial decisions of the Authority, to which the largest donors would automatically be members and in which decisions would be made by consensus.

On 1 February 2011, the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) issued an advisory opinion concerning the legal responsibilities and obligations of states parties to the convention with respect to the sponsorship of activities in the area in accordance with Part XI of the convention and the 1994 agreement.[http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf Case No. 17 – Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities With Respect to Activities in the Area – Advisory Opinion] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927215642/http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf |date=27 September 2011 }}, Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1 February 2011) The advisory opinion was issued in response to a formal request made by the International Seabed Authority following two prior applications the authority's Legal and Technical Commission had received from the Republic of Nauru and the Kingdom of Tonga regarding proposed activities (a plan of work to explore for polymetallic nodules) to be undertaken in the area by two state-sponsored contractors – Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (sponsored by the Republic of Nauru) and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd. (sponsored by the Kingdom of Tonga). The advisory opinion set forth the international legal responsibilities and obligations of sponsoring states and the authority to ensure that sponsored activities do not harm the marine environment, consistent with the applicable provisions of UNCLOS Part XI, Authority regulations, ITLOS case law, other international environmental treaties, and Principle 15 of the UN Rio Declaration.[http://itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com/2011/03/international-tribunal-on-law-of-sea.html International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea Finally Renders Advisory Opinion Establishing that the Precautionary Principle is Incorporated Within UNCLOS Law] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417142304/http://itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com/2011/03/international-tribunal-on-law-of-sea.html |date=17 April 2021 }}, ITSSD Journal on the UN Law of the Sea Convention (22 March 2011)

Part XII – Protecting the marine environment

Part XII of UNCLOS contains special provisions for the protection of the marine environment, obligating all states to collaborate in this matter, as well as placing special obligations on flag states to ensure that ships under their flags adhere to international environmental regulations, often adopted by the IMO. The MARPOL convention is an example of such regulation. Part XII also bestows coastal and port states with broadened jurisdictional rights for enforcing international environmental regulation within their territory and on the high seas.Jesper Jarl Fanø (2019). Enforcing International Maritime Legislation on Air Pollution through UNCLOS. Hart Publishing.

High Seas Treaty

{{See also|High seas fisheries management#Agreement on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ Treaty)}}

{{Infobox Treaty

| name = BBNJ Agreement

| long_name = Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

| image = Flag of the United Nations.png

| image_width =

| type = International legally binding instrument

| date_drafted = 4 March 2023

| date_signed = 20 September 2023

| location_signed = New York

| date_sealed =

| date_effective =

| condition_effective = Ratification by 60 states

| date_expiration =

| signatories = 110 countries {{cite web|url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-10&chapter=21&clang=_en&_gl=1*54w05o*_ga*MTIwNTg5ODExNS4xNjk1NjkwNzM1*_ga_TK9BQL5X7Z*MTY5NTY5MDczNC4xLjEuMTY5NTY5MjE2OS4wLjAuMA..|title=Status of the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction - list of signatories|access-date=20 February 2025|publisher=United Nations}}

| parties = (17)

Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Chile, Cuba, France, Maldives, Mauritius, Federated States of Micronesia, Monaco, Palau, Panama, Seychelles, Singapore, Spain, St. Lucia, Timor-Leste

| depositor =

| language =

| languages =

| footnotes =

| wikisource =

}}

Parties

{{main|List of parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea}}

File:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea parties.svg}} {{legend|#ff6600|Signatories}} {{legend|#ca0020|Non-parties}}]]

The convention was opened for signature on 10 December 1982 and entered into force on 16 November 1994 upon deposition of the 60th instrument of ratification. The convention has been ratified by 170 parties, which includes 166 UN member states, 1 UN Observer state (Palestine), two non-member states (the Cook Islands and Niue) and the European Union.

=Role=

The significance of UNCLOS stems from the fact that it systemizes and codifies the standards and principles of international maritime law, which are based on centuries of maritime experience and are expressed to a great extent in the United Nations Charter and current international maritime law norms, such as the Geneva Conventions of 1958. A large portion of these requirements were further strengthened and expanded.capt. Enchev, V. (2012), Fundamentals of Maritime Law {{ISBN|978-954-8991-69-8}}

References

External links

[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm Text of the treaty] [https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf (pdf)]
[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/reference_files/chronological_lists_of_ratifications.htm List of countries that have ratified Law of the Sea Conventions]
[http://www.itlos.org/ International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20090307100642/http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029 Permanent Court of Arbitration – Past and Pending Cases]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20100628141933/http://www.brill.nl/default.aspx?partid=210 Decisions of the World Court Relevant to the UNCLOS (2010)] and [http://www.uu.nl/nilos/books Contents & Indexes]{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea]
[https://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/clcs_home.htm UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf]
{{cite web |url= http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/CB/C-51_Ed4-EN.pdf |title= Technical aspects of the UN Law of the Sea |access-date= 12 September 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130524163050/http://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/CB/C-51_Ed4-EN.pdf |archive-date= 24 May 2013 |url-status= dead }} {{small|(4.89 MB)}}
[https://web.archive.org/web/20040807100300/http://www.continentalshelf.org/ UNEP Shelf Programme, UN organisation set up to assist States in delineating their continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (370 km)]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20081019095511/http://web.unimc.it/internazionale/sea.htm UNCLOS Italian Database]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20061229231026/http://seaaroundus.org/eez/eez.aspx EEZ/CS Boundaries Canadian Database]
[http://www.marineregions.org/sources.php#eez Digital Map of the World's Exclusive Economic Zones]
[http://www.sopac.org/tiki-index.php?page=Pacific+Island+Regional+Maritime+Boundaries+Project SOPAC Maritime Boundaries Database]{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
[https://web.archive.org/web/20131017052018/http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/gclos/gclos.html Introductory note by Tullio Treves], procedural history note and audiovisual material on the 1958 Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea in the [http://legal.un.org/avl/historicarchives.html Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law]
[http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/uncls/uncls.html Introductory note by Tullio Treves], procedural history note and audiovisual material on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the [http://legal.un.org/avl/historicarchives.html Historic Archives of the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law]