User:Onetwothreeip/List of box office bombs (2000s)

|2000

|The film opened at #4 at the North American box office making US$5.4 million in its opening weekend.{{cite news| url=http://articles.latimes.com/2000/oct/23/entertainment/ca-40646 | work=Los Angeles Times | first=Richard | last=Natale | title='Parents' Gets In the Last Word With Moviegoers | date=2000-10-23}}

|2006

|The film received a negative response from critics, with criticism revolving around the film's self-indulgence and lack of consistency and characterization, along with it being considered a comedy and not a drama.{{cite web | url=http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/ladyinthewater | title=Lady in the Water (2006): Reviews | publisher=Metacritic| accessdate=2010-05-05 }}{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lady_in_the_water/ |title=Lady in the Water on |publisher=Rottentomatoes.com |date= |accessdate=2018-06-12}} The film was also a financial disappointment grossing merely $72 million against a $70 million production budget. In its opening weekend (July 21–23, 2006), the film grossed a total of $18.2 million, placing third in the U.S. box office results for that weekend. It was Shyamalan's lowest opening for any of his five major films. As a result of the negative reviews and poor word-of-mouth, its second week fell sharply to $7.1 million, pushing its total to only $32.2 million. Its third weekend was no better, falling another 62.1% to $2.7 million. As of 2011, its total was $42.285 million. In addition, the film made only $30.5 million in the foreign box office, pulling its tally to approximately $72.785 million internationally.

|2009

|The film received generally negative reviews from critics and was a box office bomb, grossing just $68 million against its a $100 million budget. It received seven Golden Raspberry Award nominations, including Worst Picture, winning Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel. On its opening day of June 5, the film was a box office flop by grossing only $7.9 million. The film performed under expectations in its first weekend in theaters, its $19 million opening was far less than the expected $30 million. The film's box office results fell far behind that of the 2009 comedy The Hangover, which opened during the same weekend.{{cite web|url=http://www.thehdroom.com/news/The_Hangover_Looks_Up_at_Pixar_in_Weekend_Box_Office_Results/4949 |title=The Hangover Looks "Up" at Pixar in Weekend Box Office Results |publisher=TheHDRoom |date=2009-06-07 |author=Dan Bradley |accessdate=2017-01-15}}{{cite web |title = Is America over Will Ferrell? |url = http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31156974/ |last = Nashawaty |first = Chris |publisher = EW.com |date = 2009-06-07 |accessdate = 2009-06-08}} The film's opening weekend gross was about two-thirds what Universal reportedly expected to earn.{{cite web|title=Down goes Ferrell! Up goes Ferrell! |url=http://blog.redbox.com/redblog/2009/06/down-goes-farrell-down-goes-farrell.html |last=Peterseim |first=Locke |publisher=Redblog |date=2009-06-08 |accessdate=2009-06-09 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090612062044/http://blog.redbox.com/redblog/2009/06/down-goes-farrell-down-goes-farrell.html |archivedate=June 12, 2009 }} It made $69 million worldwide. In 2014, the Los Angeles Times listed the film as one of the most expensive box office flops of all time.{{cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-box-office-flops-pictures,0,7165703.photogallery#axzz2tJcnZf9r |title=The costliest box office flops of all time |newspaper=LA Times |date= |accessdate=2017-01-15}}{{subscription required}}

|2003

|The Cradle of Life received mostly negative reviews, though critics noted it as an improvement on its predecessor, particularly in the action sequences, and continued to praise Angelina Jolie's performance as Lara Croft. Despite this, it did not repeat its box office performance, grossing $156 million compared to the previous installment's $275 million. It was still a financial success, and plans were made for a sequel, which were cancelled when Jolie declined to reprise her role as Croft. The series was rebooted in 2018 with Alicia Vikander taking over the title role. The film debuted in fourth place with a take of $21.8 million.[http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2003&wknd=30&p=.htm Weekend Box Office Results for July 25-27, 2003] - Box Office Mojo In the United Kingdom, the film opened at number three, earning £1.5 million in its first three days.{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3182735.stm |title=Entertainment | Lara's second box office raid fails |publisher=BBC News |date=2003-08-26 |accessdate=2012-07-09}} The film finished with a domestic gross of $65 million. Paramount blamed the failure of the film on the poor performance of the then-latest installment of the video game series, Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness.[http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,471520,00.html Blame Game] - Entertainment Weekly, 7/29/03 After numerous delays, Angel of Darkness was rushed to shelves just over a month before the release of the movie, despite the final product being unfinished and loaded with glitches. It spawned mediocre sales while garnering mixed reviews from critics,[http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps2/tombraidertheangelofdarkness Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness] - Metacritic and former Eidos Interactive senior executive Jeremy Heath-Smith, who was also credited as an executive producer in the film, resigned days after the game was released.

|2007

|The film premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2007 before going into limited release in the U.S. on October 12, 2007. It initially opened on seven screens in New York City, New York; and Los Angeles, California, and earned $90,418 on its opening weekend. It later expanded to 321 theaters and remained in release for 147 days, earning $5,972,884 domestically and $5,320,639 in foreign markets for a worldwide box-office total of $11,293,663.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=larsandtherealgirl.htm|title=BoxOfficeMojo.com|website=BoxOfficeMojo.com|date=6 March 2008|accessdate=10 April 2012}} The film was featured at the Austin Film Festival, the Heartland Film Festival, the Torino Film Festival, the Glasgow Film Festival, and the Las Palmas de Gran Canaria International Film Festival.

|2001

|Prior to release, DreamWorks pulled the original poster from circulation, which depicted an American flag flying upside down (a standard distress call), due to concerns about public sensitivity related to the September 11 attacks.{{cite news|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/26/rec.fall.movies/index.html|title=Fall movies undergo changes|last=Vercammen|first=Paul |date=2001-09-26|publisher=CNN|accessdate=2009-01-09}}{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34295,00.html|title=Hollywood Lights Dim After Attack|date=2001-09-11|publisher=Fox News|accessdate=2009-01-09}} The film was released on October 19, 2001, in 2,262 North American theaters, grossing $7,088,213 on its opening weekend with an average of $3,133 per theater. The release spanned 63 days (9 weeks), closing on December 20, 2001, with a total domestic gross of $18,244,060. The film grossed $9,398,647 overseas, with the lowest earning in Egypt ($5,954) and the highest ($1,410,528) in Germany.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=lastcastle.htm|title=The Last Castle: Foreign Box Office |publisher=Box Office Mojo|accessdate=2009-01-09}}

|2006

|The film opened on 2,514 screens in the US, earning $12,806,188 and ranking number two in its opening weekend. It eventually grossed $38,399,961 in the US and $4,943,287 in foreign markets for a worldwide box office total of $43,343,248.

|2006

|The Last Kiss premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival.{{cite web|url=http://screenanarchy.com/2006/08/aronofskys-the-fountain-to-play-tiff-2006.html|title=Aronofsky's The Fountain To Play TIFF 2006!|last=Brown|first=Todd|work=Screen Anarchy|date=2006-08-10|accessdate=2017-05-27}} The film grossed $11.6 million in the United States and Canada and $4.2 million in other markets (including $2,508,416 in the United Kingdom) for a combined worldwide theatrical gross of $15.9 million.[http://www.boxofficemojo.com/ Box Office Mojo] - [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lastkiss06.htm The Last Kiss (2006)]. Retrieved 9 April 2008.

|2007

|The film had a relatively poor reception by the public and critics. As of June 2010, the film had an average score of 37 out of 100 on Metacritic based on 12 reviews.[http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/lastlegion Last Legion, The (2007): Reviews]. Metacritic. Retrieved 22 August 2007 On Rotten Tomatoes, 16% of critics gave the film positive reviews, based on 55 reviews (9 "fresh", 46 "rotten"). The site's consensus reads, "With miscast leads and unoriginal, uninspired dialogue, The Last Legion pales in comparison to the recent cinematic epics it invokes."[http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/last_legion/ The Last Legion — Rotten Tomatoes]. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 22 August 2007

|2001

|

|2004

|Laws of Attraction received generally negative reviews from critics, as it holds a 17% rating on Rotten Tomatoes where the site calls the film "a bland and forgettable copy of Adam's Rib."{{rotten-tomatoes|laws_of_attraction|Laws of Attraction}} On Metacritic, the film holds a 38/100 rating, indicating "generally unfavorable" reviews.{{metacritic film|laws-of-attraction|Laws of Attraction}} The film opened at No. 5 in the US box office in the weekend of 30 April 2004, raking in US$6,728,905 in its first opening weekend.{{cite web|title=Weekend Box Office Results for April 30 – May 2, 2004|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2004&wknd=18&p=.htm|work=Amazon.com|publisher=Box Office Mojo|date=3 May 2004|accessdate=10 March 2013}}

|2003

|The film grossed over $175 million worldwide at the box office, rental revenue of $48.6 million, and DVD sales as of 2003 at $36.4 million.{{cite web|url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2003/TLOEG.php|title=The Numbers: Box Office Data|publisher=|accessdate=October 4, 2014}} It was intended to spawn a film franchise based on further titles in the original comic book series but there was little enthusiasm for a sequel. The film marked Sean Connery's last on-screen film appearance before his retirement. The film opened at #2 behind Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl.{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=leagueofextraordinarygentlemen.htm | title=The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen | work=Box Office Mojo | accessdate=2011-05-17}} The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen grossed an estimated $66,465,204 in Canada and the United States, $12,603,037 in the United Kingdom, and $12,033,033 in Spain. Worldwide, the film took $179,265,204.{{cite web | url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=leagueofextraordinarygentlemen.htm | title=The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen – Foreign Gross | work=Box Office Mojo | accessdate=2011-05-17}}

|2008

|In its opening weekend, the film grossed $12.6 million in 2,769 theaters in the United States and Canada, ranking #3 at the box office behind Nim's Island,{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=leatherheads.htm |title=Leatherheads (2008) - Weekend Box Office Results |accessdate=2008-04-07 |publisher=Box Office Mojo}} below the expectations of Universal Studios.{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/06/boxoffice.ap/index.html |title='21' stays on top for second weekend in a row |accessdate=2008-04-06 |agency=Associated Press |date=2008-04-06 |publisher=CNN |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080408014654/http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/04/06/boxoffice.ap/index.html |archivedate = 2008-04-08}} Viewers in their 50s to 80s were the main audience for the film. As of October 2013, the movie had made about $31.2 million from the United States and Canada and $10.1 million from other markets making a global total of

$41.3 million. The budget for the film was $58 million.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=leatherheads.htm |title=Leatherheads (2008) |publisher=Box Office Mojo |date=2008-06-05 |accessdate=2018-06-12}}

|2000

|At the time of its release, the film was promoted by its creators as the "biggest and most ambitious Christian film ever made."Janaya Stephens, "The Making of Left Behind: The Movie." Left Behind: The Movie DVD Special Features. Cloud Ten Pictures, 2005. The film received generally negative reviews, holding a 16% "Rotten" score on review-aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes. Despite this, the film managed to spawn two additional sequels based on the second novel in the series, Tribulation Force and World at War. The film opened 17th in the nation over the February 2–4 weekend, making $2,158,780. The film went on to gross a total of $4,224,065, barely surpassing its budget.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=leftbehind.htm|title=Box Office Mojo: Left Behind Weekend Gross Results|publisher=|accessdate=October 19, 2014}}

|2000

|On release, the film was a box office bomb, grossing almost $40 million worldwide, and received mixed to negative reviews; criticism was targeted by several African American commentators and reviewers for employing the "magical negro" stereotype.{{cite magazine|title=That Old Black Magic |date=2000-05-27 |first=Christopher John |last=Farley |authorlink=Christopher John Farley |magazine=Time |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998604,00.html |accessdate=2007-02-03}} The Legend of Bagger Vance opened at #3 at the U.S. box office, grossing $11,516,712 from 2,061 theaters.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=legendofbaggervance.htm|title=The Legend of Bagger Vance|publisher=Box Office Mojo}} According to the Internet Movie Database, the film's total gross came to $30,695,227, far short of its estimated $80 million budget. {{cite web |title=Box Office |website=IMDb |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0146984/business}}

|2003

|

|2005

|he film was theatrically released on October 24, 2005 by Columbia Pictures, and earned $142.4 million on a $75 million budget.

|2004

|The film has grossed $4,835,065 in North America and $6,016,999 in other territories, for a total of $10,852,064 worldwide.{{cite web |title = The Libertine (2005) |url = http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=libertine.htm |work = Box Office Mojo |publisher = Internet Movie Database |accessdate = 20 February 2011 }}

|2001

|The film opened in twenty-nine theaters in the US and grossed $294,056 on its opening weekend. It eventually earned $15,667,270 in the US and $8,236,521 in foreign markets for a total worldwide box office of $23,903,791.

|2004

|The film grossed a total of $24,020,403 domestically after twelve weeks in release, less than half its $50 million production budget. It took in a further $10,788,000 internationally, bringing the total gross to $34,808,403.{{cite web | title = The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou| url = http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lifeaquatic.htm | website = Box Office Mojo | publisher = Amazon.com|accessdate=September 3, 2015}}

|2007

|The film opened in limited release on April 18, 2008, in the United States and grossed $20,220 in eight theaters its opening weekend, averaging $2,527 per theater. As of Jun 27–29, 2008, it had a domestic total gross of $303,439, and a production budget of $13 million.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=lifebeforehereyes.htm |title=The Life Before Her Eyes (2008) – Weekend Box Office Results |accessdate=2008-04-23 |publisher=Box Office Mojo}}

|2003

|The Life of David Gale received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics and has a rating of 19% on Rotten Tomatoes based on 156 reviews with an average score of 4.2 out of 10. The consensus states "Instead of offering a convincing argument against the death penalty, this implausible, convoluted thriller pounds the viewer over the head with its message."{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/life_of_david_gale/ |title=The Life of David Gale (2003) |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |date= |accessdate=2018-06-12}} The film also has a score of 31 out of 100 on Metacritic based on 36 reviews indicating 'Generally unfavorable reviews.'{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-life-of-david-gale |title=The Life of David Gale Reviews |publisher=Metacritic |date= |accessdate=2016-09-06}}

|2002

|The film was a commercial and financial loss, grossing only $16,872,671 against its $40,000,000 budget.

|2007

|The film took in USD6.7 million in its opening weekend and debuted at the number four spot.{{cite magazine | last =Rich | first =Joshua | title =Box Office Report:Bee Movie: Swarm Alert! Jerry Seinfeld's animated comedy flew into first place on its second weekend, Fred Claus performed way under expectations, and the latest Cruise missile misfired | magazine =Entertainment Weekly | pages = | language = | publisher =Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. | date =November 11, 2007 | url =http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20159596,00.html | accessdate = }} This was one of Tom Cruise's worst wide opener box office takes since The Color of Money, and Catherine Elsworth of The Daily Telegraph wrote that this result "puts it on course to be Cruise's lowest-grossing movie of all time."{{cite news | last =Elsworth | first =Cathering | title =Hollywood misreads response to war on terror: Hollywood has misjudged the public's appetite for films about Iraq and the war on terror, Cathering Elsworth says, as a slew of new movies have flopped at the box office. | work =The Daily Telegraph | pages = | language = | date =November 12, 2007 | url =https://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/11/12/bflions112.xml | accessdate =2007-12-03 | location=London}} The film also opened poorly in Europe, with Variety reporting: "Savage reviews dealt the talky political drama a big blow."{{cite news | last =Thomas | first =Archie | title ='Lions' meek after Euro mauling: Fox pic finds solace in Spanish returns | work =Variety | pages = | language = | publisher =Reed Elsevier Inc. | date =November 13, 2007 | url = }} In the United Kingdom, Lions for Lambs took in $1.4 million and opened in sixth place. The film debuted at the number six spot in Germany, and number five in Brazil.{{cite news|last=Hollinger |first=Hy |author2=Leo Cendrowicz |author3=Mark Russell |title='Lions' a lamb in overseas bow: Two films from India dominate weekend int'l box office |work=The Hollywood Reporter |pages= |language= |publisher=Nielsen Business Media, Inc. |date=November 13, 2007 |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i1c7f5ec28ee21fcb3e7eeebf9b8e61cc |archive-url=https://archive.is/20130125175629/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i1c7f5ec28ee21fcb3e7eeebf9b8e61cc |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 25, 2013 |accessdate=2007-11-14 }} Overall, the film pulled in a total of $10.3 million in markets in its opening weekend outside the United States, and Reuters noted "Tom Cruise's 'Lambs' got slaughtered at the worldwide box office."{{cite news | last =Staff | first = |author2=The Hollywood Reporter | title =Cruise film "Lions" a lamb at foreign box office | work =Reuters | pages = | language = | publisher =Reuters/Hollywood Reporter | date =November 13, 2007 | url =https://www.reuters.com/article/filmNews/idUSN1351463420071114 | accessdate = 2007-11-14}} By January 14, 2008, the film's domestic returns were just under $15 million.{{cite news|last=Ryan |first=Joal |title=Driving Mr. Nicholson and Mr. Freeman |work=E! Online: News |pages= |language= |publisher=E! Entertainment Television, Inc |date=January 14, 2008 |url=http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=298e1145-eaab-4d71-a874-81fdddbe1a6e&entry=index |accessdate=2008-01-19 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080119163622/http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=298e1145-eaab-4d71-a874-81fdddbe1a6e&entry=index |archivedate=January 19, 2008 }} MSNBC reported that Cruise was concerned about the opening weekend results, and quoted a source: "Tom wanted to really hit a home run with his first United Artists movie. It was more about how the industry was going to view him than the movie going public that Tom was worried about."{{cite news | last =Staff | first = | title =Cruise concerned about 'flop' movie | work =Ireland Online | pages = | language = | publisher =Thomas Crosbie Media | date =November 13, 2007 | url =http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=237428506&p=z374z9zyz | accessdate = 2007-12-03}} In response to the opening weekend results, a representative at United Artists stated: "We performed right at the pre-weekend predictions and are glad to have done that. Given the modest production and marketing budgets we do not need to be a blockbuster hit. Everyone at United Artists are very proud of the film and could not have had a more perfect filmmaker to have made our first film."{{cite news | last =Hazlett | first =Courtney | title =Tom Cruise's disappointing weekend | work =MSNBC | pages =The Scoop | language = | publisher = | date =November 12, 2007 | url =http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21567559/ | accessdate = 2007-11-14}} International experts said that the film did not attract its core audience, and that the box office results were due to a failure of the film to cross over to the general public. On November 28, 2007, The Wall Street Journal reported that "Lions for Lambs has performed so poorly that it may not make back its $35 million investment."{{cite news | last = | first = | title =Hollywood Bombs | work = | pages =A22 | language = | publisher = The Wall Street Journal | date =November 28, 2007 | url =https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119621011146905938?mod=googlenews_wsj | accessdate = 2007-11-29}} On December 3, 2007, the New York Post reported that the film was "assessed to blow as much as $25 mil", and a report in Variety made the same assessment.{{cite news

|last=Degrandpre

|first=Andrew (Army Times)

|title=Today's war films miss the target at box office

|work=The Indianapolis Star

|pages=

|language=

|publisher=Gannett Co. Inc.

|date=December 24, 2007

|url=http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071224/LIVING/712240328/1007/LIVING

|accessdate=2008-01-19

|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080203235837/http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20071224%2FLIVING%2F712240328%2F1007%2FLIVING

|archivedate=February 3, 2008

|url-status=dead

}} Multiple sources have referred to the film as a "box office bomb", including the San Francisco Chronicle,{{cite news | last =Garofoli | first =Joe | title =War Is a Box Office Bomb | work =San Francisco Chronicle | pages = | language = | publisher = | date =November 23, 2007 | url =http://www.sfgate.com/c/acrobat/2007/11/23/Chronicle.11-23-2007.ALL.A.1.MainNews.5star-dot.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-03 }} U.S. News & World Report,{{cite news|last=Tolson |first=Jay |title=War: the Box Office Bomb: Americans shun new films |work=U.S. News & World Report |pages= |language= |publisher=U.S. News & World Report, L.P. ([http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/19/usnews/whispers/main3522889.shtml Alternate site], CBS News) |date=November 16, 2007 |url=https://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2007/11/16/war-movies-are-box-office-bombs-despite-superstar-casts.html |accessdate=2007-12-03 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071120002639/http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2007/11/16/war-movies-are-box-office-bombs-despite-superstar-casts.html |archivedate=November 20, 2007 }} Orlando Sentinel,{{cite news|last=Staff |first= |title=Is Tom Cruise REALLY Toast...this time? |work=Orlando Sentinel |pages= |language= |publisher= |date=January 17, 2008 |url=http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_movies_blog/2008/01/is-tom-cruise-t.html |accessdate=2008-01-19 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080120110631/http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_movies_blog/2008/01/is-tom-cruise-t.html |archivedate=January 20, 2008 }} the New York Post,{{cite news|last=Adams |first=Cindy |title=He's Not Known For Watching His Tongue |work=New York Post |pages= |language= |publisher=NYP Holdings, Inc. |date=December 3, 2007 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/12032007/gossip/cindy/hes_not_known_for_watching_his_tongue_369173.htm |accessdate=2007-12-03 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071206124500/http://www.nypost.com/seven/12032007/gossip/cindy/hes_not_known_for_watching_his_tongue_369173.htm |archivedate=December 6, 2007 }} and New York magazine.{{cite news | last =Kois | first =Dan |author2=Lane Brown | title =Oscar Futures: A Big Week for 'The Diving Bell and the Butterfly' | work =New York Magazine | pages = | language = | publisher =New York Magazine Holdings LLC. | date =November 16, 2007 | url =http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2007/11/oscar_futures_a_big_week_for.html | accessdate = 2007-12-03}} New York magazine called the film "a critical flop and a box-office bomb", and a report by NewsMax Media characterized it among "miserable box-office flops".{{cite news | last =Hirsen | first =James | title =Another Anti-war Flick Bombs at the Box-Office | work =Newsmax.com | pages = | language = | publisher =NewsMax Media | date =November 27, 2007 | url =http://www.newsmax.com/hirsen/Susan_Sarandon/2007/11/27/52556.html | accessdate = 2007-12-03 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20071214083632/http://www.newsmax.com/hirsen/Susan_Sarandon/2007/11/27/52556.html |archivedate = 2007-12-14}} An article in The Daily Telegraph discussed the film among a "slew of new movies" that "have flopped at the box office". The Associated Press called the film a "box-office clunker".{{cite news|last=Staff |first= |title=Survey: Depp Remains No. 1 at Box Office |agency=Associated Press |pages= |language= |publisher= |date=January 3, 2008 |url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gznmp9UudV_wcxNY3J5Eh2f3N1EAD8TUKKK80 |accessdate=2008-01-19 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080108164014/http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gznmp9UudV_wcxNY3J5Eh2f3N1EAD8TUKKK80 |archivedate=January 8, 2008 }} The film ultimately grossed $63 million worldwide, which included $15 million for its domestic gross and $48 million internationally.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lionsforlambs.htm|title=Lions for Lambs (2007)|publisher=Box Office Mojo|accessdate=2008-11-28}}

|2004

|The film opened at #5 at the North American box office, making $7,075,217 in its opening weekend behind Collateral, The Village, The Bourne Supremacy, and The Manchurian Candidate.http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2004&wknd=32&p=.htm The film ended its run with a domestic total of $20,698,668 and an international addition of $1,336,164, totaling $22,034,832 worldwide.

|2006

|Reviews of the film were generally positive. Based on 157 reviews collected by the film review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, 80% of critics gave Little Children a positive review (125 "Fresh"; 32 "Rotten"), with an average rating of 7.4/10.{{cite web |title = Little Children (2006) |url = http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/little_children/ |work = Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate = July 1, 2010 }}

|2006

|The film was theatrically released in the United States on July 14, 2006 to commercial success but largely negative reviews, including three Golden Raspberry Awards. Little Man film grossed $58,645,052 domestically and a total $101,595,121 worldwide. The film's budget was $64 million.Box Office Mojo Staff [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=littleman.htm Little Man finance report], BoxOfficeMojo.com

|2000

|It opened at #2 at the North American box office making $16 million USD in its opening weekend, behind Charlie's Angels, which was on its second consecutive week at the top spot. The film went on to earn $39.5 million domestically and another $18.8 million worldwide, bringing the total to $58.3 million. Despite its negative reception the film has received a cult following over the years. It also has a 56% audience approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and was successful on home media selling over a thousand copies on DVD and VHS.

|2000

|The film grossed $28 million against its $35 million budget, making it a box office bomb.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=littlevampire.htm|title=The Little Vampire (2000) - Box Office Mojo|work=boxofficemojo.com}}{{cite news|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2000/oct/31/entertainment/ca-44482|title=Weekend Box Office - Los Angeles Times|publisher=articles.latimes.com|accessdate=2014-04-11|date=2000-10-31}}

|2005

|

|2008

|The Longshots opened on August 22, 2008 and grossed $4,080,687 in its opening week. It flopped at the box office, grossing $11,767,866 worldwide, on a $23 million budget.

|2003

|The film was theatrically released on November 14, 2003 with mixed-to-positive critical reception.{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/looney_tunes_back_in_action/|title=Looney Tunes: Back in Action|publisher=Rotten Tomatoes|accessdate=2008-01-29}}{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/looney-tunes-back-in-action|title=Looney Tunes: Back in Action Reviews, Ratings, Credits, and More|publisher=Metacritic|accessdate=2008-01-29}} However, the film was a box office bomb,{{cite book|authorlink=Jerry Beck|last=Beck|first=Jerry|title=The Animated Movie Guide|year=2005}}{{cite web |url=http://toolooney.goldenagecartoons.com/doyle.htm |title=The New Looney Tunes: An Interview with Producer Larry Doyle |publisher=Toolooney.goldenagecartoons.com |date=2003-01-21 |accessdate=2009-06-02 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517132247/http://toolooney.goldenagecartoons.com/doyle.htm |archivedate=May 17, 2008 |df=mdy-all }} grossing $68.5 million worldwide against an $80 million budget. This was the final film to be scored by composer Jerry Goldsmith, who died less than a year after the film's release. This was also the final film to be produced by Warner Bros. Feature Animation.

|2005

|The film grossed $9,390,144 on its opening weekend, ranking number three at the North American box office behind Just Like Heaven and The Exorcism of Emily Rose. After the film's 7 weeks of release, it grossed a total of $24,149,632 on the domestic market (US and Canada), and $48,467,436 overseas, for a worldwide total of $72,617,068.{{mojo title|lordofwar|Lord of War}}

|2005

|Lords of Dogtown was the first film to be released by both Columbia Pictures and TriStar Pictures which are both trademarked by Sony Pictures Entertainment, and are sometimes referred to as Columbia TriStar Pictures.LaPorte, Nicole (April 10, 2005). [https://variety.com/2005/film/news/tristar-adds-new-label-to-table-1117920808/ "TriStar adds new label to table"]. Variety. Retrieved August 20, 2014. Upon its release, Lords of Dogtown received mostly mixed reviews. The film currently holds a 55% "Rotten" rating on the film review site Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus stating that "Lords of Dogtown, while slickly made and edited, lacks the depth and entertaining value of the far superior documentary on the same subject, Dogtown and Z-Boys."[http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lords_of_dogtown/ "Lords of Dogtown"]. Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 8, 2012. However, the movie has gained a general Cult following since its release.Watson, Elijah (September 7, 2015). [https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/lords-of-dogtown-10-year-anniversary "Ten Years Later, Lords of Dogtown Remains a Monument to Teen Boy Bravado"]. Noisey.com. Retrieved September 13, 2016. It is also considered to be one of the best skateboarding movies of all time according to many fans of the Sport.[http://www.enkivillage.com/top-10-skateboard-movies.html "Top 10 Skateboard Movies"]. EnkiVillage. Retrieved September 13, 2016.

|2000

|The film opened at #8 at the North American box office, making US$6,008,611 in its opening weekend. The film generated a total of US$15.6 million in the US. It failed further when released worldwide, grossing a total of just US$2.7 million. The film did not break even on its production costs.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=loser.htm|title=Loser (2000) - Box Office Mojo|work=boxofficemojo.com}}[http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=features&Id=190 Is Loser The Underdog?] FilmThreat.

|2008

|The film has received generally negative reviews. Review aggregate Rotten Tomatoes reports that 26% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 38 reviews, with an average score of 4.4/10.{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/loss_of_a_teardrop_diamond/ |title=Rotten Tomatoes |website=Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate=2010-09-05}} Metacritic, however, gave it an overall 51 out of 100 rating.http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-loss-of-a-teardrop-diamond/critic-reviews

|2000

|The film was shot in 1998 on location in Los Angeles and New York City in America. The film was initially set for release in October 1999. However, due to a flood of "end of the world" and supernatural horror movies such as End of Days and Stigmata scheduled for release around the same time, a decision was made to delay the film. The second release date, February 2000, was also cancelled due to a conflict with the very popular Scream franchise. A final release date of October 2000 was finally decided upon, which also happened to be exactly the same day as the re-release of The Exorcist. The film opened at #3 at the North American box office making USD$7,954,766 in its opening weekend. Lost Souls ultimately grossed only $31.3 million worldwide, making it a Box office bomb. The film was given very negative reviews from critics, though the condemnation was somewhat tempered by praise for its photography and atmosphere. It currently holds a 7% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 90 reviews with the consensus stating: "Though Kaminski's film is visually stylish, Lost Souls is just another derivative entry in the Apocalypse genre, with lackluster direction, unengaging characters, and no scares." It is ranked at number 95 on their 100 worst-reviewed movies of the 2000s.

|2005

|The film opened on 2,502 screens in the United States on April 22, 2005. It earned $7,576,593 on its opening weekend, ranking fourth after The Interpreter, The Amityville Horror, and Sahara. It eventually grossed $21,845,719 in the US and $21,041,000 in foreign markets for a total worldwide box office of $42,886,719.

|2008

|The film did poorly at the box office. In its opening weekend, The Love Guru grossed $13.9 million in 3,012 theaters in the United States and Canada, ranking #4 at the box office,{{mojo title|id=loveguru|title=The Love Guru}} falling short of the $20 million range forecast by Hollywood pundits.{{cite web|url=http://news.aol.com/entertainment/movies/movie-news-story/ar/_a/smart-moviegoers-give-guru-no-love/20080622125209990001?icid=100214839x1204643267x1200196505 |title='Smart' Moviegoers Give 'Guru' No Love |accessdate=2008-06-23 |publisher=America Online}} The film grossed $32.2 million in the United States and Canada and an additional $8.7 million overseas, for a total of $40.8 million worldwide, against its $62 million budget. When the film was released in the United Kingdom, it ranked only #8 on the opening weekend.{{cite web|url=http://www.25thframe.co.uk/charts/chart.php?chart=20080801|title=Weekend box office 1st August 2008 – 3rd August 2008 |publisher=www.25thframe.co.uk|accessdate=19 February 2017}}

|2005

|Originally produced as a feature film by Media 8 Entertainment, the Weinstein Company purchased the rights and, after several failed attempts to interest a theatrical distributor in the U.S., sold the TV rights to the ABC Family Channel – where it finally premiered on January 21, 2007.{{cite web|url=http://www.movieweb.com/movies/film/44/2944/summary.php |title=Love Wrecked TV rights sold to ABC Family |publisher=Movie Web |accessdate=2008-02-06 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080111145726/http://www.movieweb.com/movies/film/44/2944/summary.php |archivedate=2008-01-11 |url-status=dead }} In the UK, Love Wrecked was the first film released by Delanic Films,{{cite web|url=http://www.delanic.com/films.html|title=Love Wrecked receives credit for Delanic's first film|publisher=Delanic Films|accessdate=2008-02-19}} and was released on May 18, 2007. The film opened at no. 6 on the UK box office chart at 235 screens, and grossed £600,000.{{cite web|url=http://www.delanic.com/about.html|title=UK distribution rights for Love Wrecked sold to Delanic Films|publisher=Delanic Films|accessdate=2008-02-06}}

|2009

|In the film's opening weekend, in limited release, it grossed $116,616, despite only having been screened in three theaters, placing it at 30th place on the box office chart. The Lovely Bones grossed over $44 million in North America.{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lovelybones.htm |title=The Lovely Bones (2009) |publisher=Box Office Mojo |accessdate=2010-02-27}} On December 11, 2009, the film was released on three screens in Los Angeles and New York. As of January 4, 2010, the film had grossed over $389,000 in the US. Claudia Eller and Ben Fritz of the Los Angeles Times felt that it did poorly at the box office in the first few weeks of its release because of average reviews and negative word-of-mouth. During its opening-weekend release on three screens, it earned over $116,616, an average of estimated $38,872 per-theater revenue. The film's revenue placed it at thirtieth place on the box office chart. In the film's second and third weeks of release, the film saw a decrease; in the fourth week, it had a 54.3-percent increase.{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&id=lovelybones.htm |work=BoxOfficeMoJo.com |title=THE LOVELY BONES (2009): Weekend Box Office Results |accessdate=December 28, 2009}} When put into wide release on January 15, 2010,{{cite web |url=http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/entertainment/6612462/lovely-bones-is-jacksons-new-territory/ |title=Lovely Bones is Jackson's new territory |author=Paula Bustamante |date=2009-12-22 |work=Au.News.Yahoo.com |accessdate=December 28, 2009 }}{{dead link|date=March 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} it grossed $17,005,133 that weekend, ranking number three at the domestic box office. By the end of its run, The Lovely Bones had made $44,114,232 domestically, and $49,507,108 overseas, for a worldwide total of $93,621,340.

|2000

|Love's Labour's Lost was not a box office success. It opened on 2 April 2000 in the United Kingdom, earning £143,649 in its run on 186 screens. It later opened on 11 June 2000 in the United States, playing on two screens and earning $24,496 on its opening weekend. In its US release, Love's Labour's Lost played on fewer than 20 screens and brought in $284,291 against a budget of $13 million. As a result of its poor commercial performance, Miramax shelved its three-picture deal with Kenneth Branagh, who subsequently returned to Shakespeare with As You Like It in 2006.

|2006

|Lucky Number Slevin opened in 1,984 theaters in North America and grossed $7,031,921, with an average of $3,544 per theater and ranking #5 at the box office. The film ultimately earned $22,495,466 domestically and $33,813,415 internationally for a total of $56,308,881, above its $27 million budget.{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=luckynumberslevin.htm|title=Lucky Number Slevin (2006) – Box Office Mojo|work=boxofficemojo.com}}

|2000

|The film, based on a $63 million budget, only grossed $10,890,222 in return.

|2007

|The film was initially set for release on December 16, 2005.{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/news?year=2005|title= Duvall gets 'Lucky' break as father |website= IMDb.com |date= March 4, 2005|accessdate= October 15, 2014}}{{cite web|url=http://imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |title=Lucky You (2005) release info |website=IMDb.com |date=April 7, 2005 |accessdate=October 15, 2014 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20050407020136/http://imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |archivedate=April 7, 2005 }} This was pushed back to September 8, 2006.{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |title=Lucky You (2006) release info |website=IMDb.com |date=April 13, 2006 |accessdate=October 15, 2014 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060413181055/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |archivedate=April 13, 2006 }} By December 2006, the film had been re-scheduled for release on March 16, 2007.{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |title=Lucky You (2007) release info |website=IMDb.com |date=December 28, 2006 |accessdate=October 15, 2014 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20061228032329/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |archivedate=December 28, 2006 }} In January 2007, the film's eventual release date was unveiled to be May 4, 2007.{{cite web|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |title=Lucky You (2007) release info |website=IMDb.com |date=January 23, 2007 |accessdate=October 15, 2014 |url-status=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070123203855/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338216/releaseinfo |archivedate=January 23, 2007 }} Opening the same weekend as Spider-Man 3, the film debuted at $2.7 million in ticket sales; the lowest saturated opening week since 1982.{{cite web|work=Box Office Mojo|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/weekends/worstopenings.htm?page=WRSTOPN25&p=.htm|title=Worst Wide Openings}} It finished with just over $5.7 million in total revenue. The film received generally negative review from critics. It currently ranks at 29% on Rotten Tomatoes.{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lucky_you/|title=Lucky You - Rotten Tomatoes|website=Rotten Tomatoes |accessdate=21 July 2012}}