User talk:みしまるもも

Welcome!

style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"

|style="border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|

{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"

|

Hello, みしまるもも, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{tl|Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking File:Insert-signature.png if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

{{Welcomeg/links}}

|}

|}

{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|box-width=238px|

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

June 2024

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Thedarkknightli. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person{{spaces|1}}on :Jet Li, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please remember that Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, see WP:CIRCULAR. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you so much for letting me know. Sorry for bothering you. I've commented on your talk page for more details. Thanks.--みしまるもも (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Talk: Yasuke

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Brocade River Poems 06:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

:File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. WP:NOTFORUM and your post [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yasuke&diff=prev&oldid=1239257361 here] about your personal activities is entirely irrelevant and some of your statements are skirting dangerously close to WP:NATIONALIST. Brocade River Poems 07:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Please don't use article talk page to talk about your personal favorite activities or expressing your personal experience. I am seriously considering removing this {{diff|Talk:Yasuke|diff=prev|oldid=1239257361|4=message of yours}} on talk:Yasuke which is a violation of WP:NOTFORUM. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 07:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Yukio Mishima

Hi, long time no see! Hope you're having a good day. I'm here to ask about the Yukio Mishima article, you've said last month you planned upon an English version for the 三島事件 which you've brought up to GA quality on Japanese Wikipedia, and I wish to know whether or not you still desire to do so? If so, I'll do my very best to help you out with said venture. Zinderboff(talk) 04:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

:Hi Zinderboff. Thank you very much. I am currently translating the "三島事件" on my PC notebook, translating the "1967" part of the section "The JSDF and Mishima," which summarizes the events that occurred in the four years leading up to the incident.

:

:I am thinking of making the English version shorter than the Japanese version, up to the section "The JSDF and Mishima," so I think I will have the whole article draft ready by early October.

:

:I have copied the translation up to the point where I have completed it (up to "After the incident") to the sandbox. (User:みしまるもも/sandbox) There are probably quite a few sentences that are difficult to understand in English, so please check them. At the end of the sentence for the three defendants, the judge quoted words from 王陽明 Wang Yangming's "伝習録," and I had a hard time translating that part. I need to check the literature that Japanese translation of the original meaning of Wang Yangming's words, otherwise the English translation is still a little unclear. みしまるもも (talk) 06:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

::Hi! Sorry for not doing too much work on the draft yet. I'm currently a little bit busy, but will help all the way when I get time soon! Zinderboff(talk) 16:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

:::Hi. Thank you for your kindness. Of course, it's perfectly fine for you to check it when you have time. It's OK. I'm also translating the next draft little by little, so it will take quite a while before I can paste all the drafts into the sandbox. みしまるもも (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|みしまるもも}}, regarding the same article and {{u|CyberIdris}}'s contributions, please use WP:ANI instead of WP:AIV for such detailed reports that may require discussion. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

"we will ask you to block us"

Hi {{u|みしまるもも}}, is "we will ask you to block us" in Special:Diff/1256046480 the result of a machine translation or AI? On Wikipedia, being blocked is something undesirable; being blocked means losing the technical ability to edit pages. Only administrators can block users from editing pages. This is why "we will ask you to block us" makes no sense: The other user can't block you from editing, and it isn't something you'd want to happen if it was possible. Also, you seem to refer to yourself in plural ("us"), which sounds as if multiple people use your account. Hence I wonder which machine or misunderstanding has created this strange statement. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

:Ah, sorry. I guess I posted the machine translation without really checking it. Thanks for letting me know. みしまるもも (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

::No problem! Thanks for the clarification. If I understand correctly, your English is good enough for editing and discussing Wikipedia, and you use translation only because it is more convenient for you to write in Japanese and the translator might find words that you didn't know yet. That's perfectly fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

:::Thank you for your kind words. English is still difficult for me because it is a completely different language from Japanese. みしまるもも (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Sock investigation

Hi みしまるもも, hope all's well! I have asked others whether or not your report was correctly filed. I just wanted to say you can add the fact that they've been warned against edit-warring and editing while logged out. They've deleted the first message and explicatly denied editing logged out. Zinderboff(talk) 01:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hi みしまるもも! Just wanted you to know that the investigation has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CyberIdris. Cheers! Zinderboff(talk) 02:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

::I've also been told that in case you want to file future sock reports, use the form in the box on WP:SPI in the future. Zinderboff(talk) 02:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

:::Your kindness is greatly appreciated. Thank you. みしまるもも (talk) 02:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at the Administrator's Noticeboard Incidents which involves you. The discussion may be found [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#みしまるもも_personal_attacks_and_threats here]. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Notice

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CyberIdris (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (:Yukio Mishima) for a period of 1 week for edit warring and making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  voorts (talk/contributions) 19:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Final warning: [[WP:FOC|Focus on content]] on article talk pages

Hi {{u|みしまるもも}}, if I see one single further personal attack at Talk:Yukio Mishima from you, I'll place an indefinite block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

:No matter how many times I explained that Mishima did not advocate "direct rule by the Emperor," CyberIdris was not convinced, so I simply told him to participate with a minimum level of knowledge, rather than relying on information from a site that does not provide any specifics. I am not personally attacking CyberIdris.

:On the contrary, I think it is unfair that you have not done anything about the fact that CyberIdris has labeled me as a "nationalist" in various places and personally attacked me by saying that I am trying to conceal information. Why? みしまるもも (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

::Hello! I hope it's ok to comment quickly, since we've both worked on the same article recently. I can see that you both feel strongly about your positions, which is commendable. You both felt passionately that you were correct (I'm not experienced enough to comment on that) but it meant that you were sharper with each other than you perhaps should have been?

::You've both been blocked from a single article for a few days because of this, which is enough time to cool down and regain focus, as well as working on other articles perhaps. There's a good principle, called dropping the stick, that I'm sure you've come across. Please take it to heart so we can work together again in future! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 23:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

:::Dear Blue-Sonnet. Thank you very much for your kind words and your message, Blue-Sonnet. I am very grateful for your editing. As you say, I may have been a little too absorbed in my edits. I put preparing meals for my family and shopping on the back burner, so I should be grateful to the administrator for giving me time off.

:::Blue-Sonnet, you are from the UK. I have traveled to the US (California and New York), but I have never been to the UK, but it seems to me that there are some similarities between the UK and Japan. There was also Miura Anjin. I feel like my heart has been loosened a little by Blue-Sonnet's advice. Thank you very much. I look forward to your continued support. みしまるもも (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

::::I'm so happy to hear you're feeling happier now! I could tell you were upset & wanted to try to reach out, even if it didn't work.

::::I would dearly love to visit Japan one day, as you've said we do have a lot of similarities in our cultures! Both have roots in politeness & respect for others, as well as remembering our history with plenty of historical sites and monuments.

::::I've been to Florida in the 1990's but I haven't been abroad since, I'm saving up for either Italy or Japan, both countries have such a rich historical heritage!

::::Please do take some time off for yourself - the internet is a difficult place, so I think everyone should have a break from it every so often ❤️ Blue-Sonnet (talk) 01:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello みしまるもも, hope all is well! Sorry for not contacting sooner. I see progress on the Mishima Incident have been wonderful! I do wonder though, with the current length of your work, are you perhaps thinking of splitting it into smaller articles? Zinderboff (talk) 10:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, Zinderboff, Thank you. The original Japanese article is a long article as well, so I have no intention of shortening it at the moment. Is it too long for the English article? The origin of the name Tatenokai is also included in the English "Tatenokai" article, so perhaps it is possible to shorten that part, but for the most part it contains essential information about the Mishima Incident. Regarding the section "Works based on or inspired by the Mishima incident" can be omitted if they are not particularly necessary for the English translation article. This article as a whole is still incomplete even in draft form, and there are still parts that I would like to review by checking English biographies again, so it will probably take a few more months. Sorry for having to late finalize a draft. みしまるもも (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

::Hi みしまるもも! Unfortunately, the current length of the English article is definitely too much. On English Wiki the article length rule is shown in WP:SIZERULE. Which shows an article, at the absolute max, should be around 15,000 words. The draft however is currently around 36,000 words long!
As you mention, most information on the article is essential to understanding the event, so which is why I was asking if you're wondering whether to split the article up, so all the essential information is kept whilst keeping the length reasonable (For example "Prelude to the Mishima Incident" or "Reactions to the Mishima Incident".)
Of course, there is absolutely no hurry, take as long as you need! And thank you so much for researching and writing so much information about this! When you think the draft is ready for direct publication, others in WP:COPYEDITORS can help out to perfect the article for language and grammar! Zinderboff (talk) 08:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

:::There is no need to split now of course. Complete the draft whenever you feel like it has all the essential information, then me and, if you accept their help, others, can help you polish up/split up the work! They can work on a separate copy on your completed version, so you can determine if their changes are good or not. Zinderboff (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Thank you Zinderboff for letting me know all about it. In the Japanese articles, there are no such strict rules, so I was never told that the article on the "三島事件" was too long. The article on "三島由紀夫" is much longer than the "三島事件", and once there was a proposal to separate the list of works, etc., and I agreed with that proposal, but there was opposition from someone else (the reason being that separating the list of works in the article on "松本清張" (Seichō Matsumoto) had caused inconvenience), so "三島由紀夫" is still too long! (笑). After that, the person who opposed it, stopped being active, and since I was previously in favor of separating it, another person who had helped me with the Mishima works articles advised me that I should propose to separation, and it might pass, but at that time I also thought that the person who opposed it in the example of Seichō Matsumoto's article was right, so I didn't make any particular proposal to separate it, and no one else has done so either.

::::In this way, in the Japanese articles, separating is optional according to the circumstances of each article, and the separating is not determined by the number of words, so I didn't notice the detailed rules in the English articles. Thank you so much for letting me know.

::::I think it would be easier to understand if the article was not separated into parts, so I would like to be adjusting, while thinking of what can be omitted as much as possible. For example, the episode where Yasunari Kawabata saw Mishima's ghost, or the fact that Ken Takakura was trying to make a movie about the Mishima incident, may not be of particular interest to people other than Japanese people, so I would like to review those parts as well. みしまるもも (talk) 11:40, 25 April 2025 (UTC)