User talk:220.255.242.109

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Indian National Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

: Thank you. I have re-added the content after adding the citation. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 03:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Violence against Christians in India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have been blocked from editing for 3 months for persistent tendentious editing with addition of unsourced or poorly sourced material in articles, including tendentious coatracking. Examples, out of many: Special:Diff/1184611884/1206709921, Special:Diff/1206591749, Special:Diff/1206444322, Special:Diff/1206702615. See also this SPI. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 10:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC).

{{anchor|Ladlist}}

: {{u | Pbritti}}: Objection is frivolous and vague, please show the exact passage which substantiates your/his objection/rejection. Please no throwing the whole rule book without specific, no wasting time, no stonewalling and frustrating people. Not everyone is addicted to wikipedia, please make it a pleasant experience for non-addicts occasional editors without vague wikilawyering and without monopolising wikipedia. Please restore the article. Thanks. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

::I provided a succinct explanation twice. Again, the scope of your draft is overly broad; consider modifying it to only cover either universities or research institutions. There is nothing for me to restore, as the draft is still open, albeit rejected. If that changes, please let me know and I can petition for it to be restored. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

{{u | Pbritti}}: again, please show exact passage in the guideline which says an article with "short list" cannot cover both academic institutes (universities) and research institutes. Your objection would have some weight if the list was excessively long (which this article is not) or you could substantiate it which prohibits academic and research institutes in same article. Without the exact passage in the guideline which prohibits this, it remains subjective and WP:DISRUPTIVE and wastes efforts, reduces productivity and collaboration, and frustrates needlessly. Please do not invent rules with subjective interpretations. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

{{anchor|HoldAccountable}}

File:Information orange.svg Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Anchoring a talk page section as "Time wasters" is a clever trick, but also uncivil. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

: {{u|Pbritti}}, this is such a convoluted WP:Wikilawyering to take an anchor tag and misinterpret it as personal attack. Synonym or wiki word for Time wasters is WP:DISRUPTIVE. This is absurd to take offense to established wiki policies. I have to hold you accountable, do not go on playing victim by being taking long convoluted way. Take a break from wiki and use WP:GOODFAITH. Please, make wiki a collaborative pleasant experience. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 08:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

I understand that it's frustrating to not get your draft published, but that does not mean you get to attack the AFC reviewers. Your own explanation above, digging down on your personal attack, shows that it was quite deliberate. Please remove the offensive anchor and don't do something like that again, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 09:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC).

:On second thoughts, I've removed the anchor myself. Don't do something like that again, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 09:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC).

{{u|Bishonen}} congratulation, for reinforcing wiki is not for normal human. And, its manipulated toxic hell for scratch-each-others-back-vipers (who know how to provoke, frustrate, run out, warn, drop warning bombs, over litigate, try to ban, etc). What about WP:Disruptive fr wasting, stalling, by inventing non-productive subjective rules and dropping warning bombs by being over zealous to earn some kinda future admin votes and choke wiki to death, wow?? I have to call it out this. Invent subjective rules (No, you did not warn the culprits for it), repeat (ok, gang behavior), frustrate (wow, exclusive gang of internet addicts who are toxic), and provoke by inventing offence (wow, wow, take the cake, network if working, your scratch-the-back manipulate-wiki-rules gang will be cause of the death of wiki, google needs more such toxic evidences for it to deindex or new tech to replace it. And both are on the way.)

Just because I don't scratch back and have not created my own vipers-network by not standing for others toxic behavior who can warn or ban on my behalf, wow, this childness is escalating in more unpleasant way. I have to call it out. I wish I had time and inclination to drop warning bombs on your talk pages and expose inter-connected gang's behavior. Behave like normal pleasant welcoming human. All of you, including you, are part of what is wrong with wiki and why HUMANS DO NOT want to be part of wiki. Continue to toxic hog and monopolise and choke wiki to death. Introspect, humanise. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 01:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

:{{re|Bishonen}} the above and {{diff2|1231932041|this}} indicate a failure to engage productively. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

: If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

File:Information.svg Hello, 220.255.242.109. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of islands in Lakshadweep, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, 220.255.242.109. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of academic and research institutes in Ladakh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AList+of+academic+and+research+institutes+in+Ladakh request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, 220.255.242.109. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of islands in Lakshadweep".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AList+of+islands+in+Lakshadweep request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to :Banjara seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:43, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Sundaresvarar Temple. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. ~Liance^talk 00:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm ScrabbleTiles. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.{{PAGENAME}} ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

{{Block indent|If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.}}

Please stop indiscriminately adding references to water disputes in unrelated pages. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

: {{u|Kautilya3}}, these rivers are all part of IWT, some of these already have citations, I will added citations where citations are missing as citations mentions the articles. Thanks. 220.255.242.109 (talk)

:: Maybe. But that has been so since 1960. There is no urgent need to refer to it everywhere unless it becomes relevant in some development. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Worldbruce. An edit that you recently made to :Bangladesh–India border seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.{{PAGENAME}} --Worldbruce (talk) 03:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to :Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)