User talk:AllOtherNamesWereTaken#top
[[Chaim Walder]]
Hey, thanks for your edits! I corrected part of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaim_Walder&type=revision&diff=1062662909&oldid=1062661331&diffmode=source this] edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaim_Walder&type=revision&diff=1062687495&oldid=1062683080&diffmode=source here]. How strong is your Hebrew? If it's weak I'd advise caution in making this kind of edit. GordonGlottal (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Both honorifics were used. See second word of second paragraph [https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHsijCoXsAA4Lc3?format=jpg&name=large here].AllOtherNamesWereTaken (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
:yep, I see! GordonGlottal (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
[[Special:Permalink/1068283180#Nableezy|Your request for arbitration]] has been declined as premature
In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.
For grievances about the conduct of a Wikipedia editor, you should approach the user (in a civil, professional way) on their user talk page. However, other mechanisms for resolving a dispute also exist, such as raising the issue at the administrators' noticeboard for incidents.
In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. firefly ( t · c ) 16:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)