User talk:AlvaKedak#top

[[Draft:Badami Fort|Badami Fort]] moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Badami Fort. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is empty.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheWikipede (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

:Ok AlvaKedak (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Badami Fort]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Badami Fort, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Badami_Fort help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 12:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Contribution Appreciated

Your contribution to the Delhi Sultanate article is highly appreciated, I have improved it a bit more on my part Qaiser-i-Mashriq (talk) 08:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you AlvaKedak (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

February 2025

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm NXcrypto. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to :List of palaces in India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NXcrypto Message 04:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:@NXcrypto, I see your point, but the page is just a list of palaces in India, it doesn't explain anything, it doesn't need to cite sources, which is why I removed the tag. AlvaKedak (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Notification of ARE report

See: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#AlvaKedak here]. >>> Extorc.talk 17:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AlvaKedak! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, {{edit|Special:MyTalk|just use this link to ask for help|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you AlvaKedak (talk) 06:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Teahouse Invitation

style="margin: 2em 0;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| alt=Teahouse logo

|

Hello! AlvaKedak,

you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

Note about emails and canvassing

Hi AlvaKedak, please read Wikipedia:Canvassing, and in particular the section on stealth canvassing. The sending of emails to other editors asking them to offer their opinion or help at a discussion at an admin noticeboard is generally considered unacceptable, as outlined by that behavioural guideline. I'm sure this is just down to your inexperience with Wikipedia, but please make sure it doesn't happen again. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

:I understand @Daniel, this will not happen again. I just wanted to know how to report the users being involved in canvassing (off-wiki). AlvaKedak (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)