To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the File:OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, User:Ad Orientem (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ad_Orientem&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

{{flatlist|

{{lang|fa|فارسی |italic=no}}}}

Stalking warning

You are engaging in "stalker" behavior in editing. Report underway.

Advisory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Stalking

--67.48.200.162 (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm certainly not. As you are editing with an anonymous IP address, I took the time to look at some of the past edits you that originated from that IP address. I noticed a single edit to Timeline of the 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak that seemed like it was a lot of unnecessary information, so I trimmed it. Additionally, Colin dm (talk) agreed, by reverting your revert of my edit, that it was too much information, so I am comfortable in the knowledge that I did the right thing there. Andrew Englehart (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

:I'll just leave [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.48.200.162&diff=938057660&oldid=938057516 this] here to remind this anonymous editor not to make false accusations again. Andrew Englehart (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Rickover

Be mindful of edit warring. While you haven't crossed 3RR, you're well in to the territory. Toddst1 (talk) 02:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

: Thank you Toddst1 (talk), and I appreciate the advice. After I looked up how to report edit warring behavior by the IP address, and read more deeply on the subject, I realized I should not have let it get as far as I did before I disengaged. I'll keep that in mind in the future. Andrew Englehart (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Mentioned on ANI

I've mentioned you in passing on Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_hopper_and_ad-hominem_attacks_%2F_ignoring_consensus as having had similar problems with a problematic IP. Nothing for you to worry about but I'm obligated to notify you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Morris Jr., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spin-off and A&E. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Durga

Why you removing the fully sourced information having already strong references from the Durga article? The content was fully added by me in support with references. There's no link of any socks in this. 103.199.226.218 (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

: Sure there isn't. You just happen to be adding the same information as a blocked user was adding before they were blocked. Total coincidence! Andrew Englehart (talk) 22:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"

style="vertical-align: top;"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hi Andrew Englehart! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, {{tq|Best way to add an IP address to a sockpuppet investigation? and protect pages being edited by sockpuppet?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Best way to add an IP address to a sockpuppet investigation? and protect pages being edited by sockpuppet?}}.

The archival was done by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Discussion invitation

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg Hi {{u|Andrew Englehart}}, you are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sound of Freedom (film) § Reaching a consensus on the "Accuracy" section. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

On Patrol: Live

Any further discussion can be brought up on the talk page if you still disagree, but you are the one who needs to start the discussion since you are disputing the status quo. I thought I'd just explain this part for you. WP:PLOTREF states {{tq|"The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it is generally assumed that the work itself is the primary source for the plot summary."}}. Further, MOS:TVPLOT states {{tq|"In addition to "Plot", other appropriate headings for this section may be "Premise", "Synopsis", or "Overview""}}. In this case "plot" = "overview" and the summary does not need to be sourced since the work itself is the source. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

: "On Patrol Live" does not have a plot. You can title the section whatever you want, but unsourced sentences about the show are your own interpretation, or someone else's, about the show's "premise", "synopsis", or whatever you want to call it, and they're not WP:DUE if there's no source. Andrew Englehart (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

::As I said, per the things I quoted above. A source isn't necessary since the work itself is the primary source. However, I went ahead and added a primary source... which is the work itself.... notice the irony here? Hopefully it's enough to satisfy you? TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

::: That's not a reliable secondary source, obviously. A source is only not required for plot. On Patrol Live doesn't have a plot. You've added original research and claimed that the show itself is your source for the original research. Andrew Englehart (talk) 22:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

::::Core Wikipedia policies accept WP:PRIMARYSOURCE as citations. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[Don Cherry]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Don Cherry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Cherry&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1205967692%7CDon%20Cherry%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Andrew_Englehart§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Don Cherry}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1205967692 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on [[Don Cherry]]

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Don Cherry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Cherry&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1205967692%7CDon%20Cherry%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Andrew_Englehart§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Don Cherry}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1205967692 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Citizen Ride-Along

*shocked face* What's this? Someone using a talk page as intended instead of causing an unneeded edit war?! Perhaps you should try it yourself someday. It's not that hard. {{wink}}

Anyways, If you're still debating whether or not it actually happened, you should check out [https://www.peacocktv.com/watch/playback/vod/GMO_00000000461299_01/7afe3177-db65-33be-a599-c0141280e04c?orig_ref=direct Season 1 Episode 35]. Here's [https://www.abccolumbia.com/2022/11/11/on-patrol-live-ride-along-winner-chosen/ another source] that actually proves its existence. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:21, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

March 2025

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Faster than Thunder. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to :Don Cherry have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 00:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

: If they're defamatory or libellous, then I guess all nine sources calling his comments racist are defaming or libelling him? Hardly. Andrew Englehart (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)