User talk:Arcillaroja

This [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Europe&diff=252551923&oldid=249509994] was a bad edit. Did you read the section? The map should not have been removed altogether without much stronger reasons. Johnbod (talk) 14:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello! I think that Southeastern Europe would be sufficient and more neutral (we wouldn't have to add a separate section on Balkans then). If you find anything discussable, go on and demand sources :) I won't discuss much on SEE as I'm not a specialist in the field. There were misunderstandings in our discussion, the topic is delicate and complex, maybe it'll be better to add more comments where necessary. However, it takes shape :) Regards, Montessquieu (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

People in 'South-Eastern' actually prefer the term 'the Balkans' --Gironauni (talk) 19:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Western Europe and Eastern Europe article is not based on the opinions of European geographers and European scientific academies. Read real encyclopedias: (English Britannica or German Brockhaus.) instead of defending the american "cold war" stupidity in the articles.

You have been edit warring on Eastern Europe for the past 2 or 3 days. Can you please stop so you don't get blocked? If an admin checked that page they would immediately block you because you have made much more than 3 reverts in 24 hours. ValenShephard (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi thanks for the warning :) I was aware of the 3 rv rule... I think I did not trespassed it anyways, but thanks. we could keep discussing if you want at the page. Cu! --Arcillaroja (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 09:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

::Dear Gregorik. Do not try to scare me with your patronizing words. If you do not agree with my edits you can discuss them in the page in order to reach consensus. If you feel otherwise you are more than welcome to ask an admin intervention. And please stop using weasel wording with me. Arcillaroja (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 10:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

:: Accusing me of vandalizing articles is not only impolite, but also useless. Please refrain yourself. Arcillaroja (talk) 11:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 08:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 11:45, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

:The discussion is at WP:ANI#Thinly covered racist tendencies & long term tendentious editing by Arcillaroja. If people are convinced that your edits express an ethnic bias regarding Eastern Europe, administrators may warn or sanction you under the WP:DIGWUREN arbitration case. I urge you to respond at ANI and explain your thinking. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

::Hello Arcillaroja. I am glad to see you've been leaving previous discussions here. In that spirit, here is where the November ANI is now archived: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive727#Complaint about editing by Arcillaroja at Central Europe and Eastern Europe. In my opinion, Gregorik's complaint about you used stronger language than his evidence justified. It is regrettable that there has been a 3RR complaint recently at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive175#User:Rejedef reported by User:Toddy1 (Result: Blocked for 24h) which seems to indicate that you and others are not making adequate efforts at WP:Dispute resolution about these articles. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)~

Hi there and happy new year! Yes I got warned on time about the 3RR! Could someone lead us a bit in this discussion? Because I have the feeling that these articles are only of interest to those editors that personally feel patronized by them. I'd like to add some more neutrality to it but then I get accused of being racist and what not... Arcillaroja (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

:If there are only two disputants you can request a WP:Third opinion. If more than two, consider opening a WP:Request for comment. EdJohnston (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

30px Please do not make more reverts to the articles on Eastern Europe and Western Europe for a few days. If you see a change to the article that you think should be reverted, please bring it to the attention of another editor and ask them to consider making the revert. If you continue reverting User:Rejedef, you will get blocked. I assume that you are familiar with Wikipedia:Edit warring, and know that just because the reverts are over a period longer than 24 hours, you can still get blocked.

Whilst I am sympathetic to what you are trying to do, you are approaching a line. Please do not cross that line.--Toddy1 (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi I know the rules but thanks for the warning! Arcillaroja (talk) 12:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

:A report on the other user has been placed on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. This report does mention that both of you received a warning, and mentions that the other user continued reverting after the warning.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note that while I am not blocking you for edit warring, you are within a half a millimeter of it yourself. You did stop after being asked to, which is important. Please continue to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. However, your attitude there needs to change as well. Your position that any mention of controversy about this term is POV is itself POV. There is nothing NPOV about adding a well-referenced controversy section to an article that says something like "Even though this term is in common usage, some academics have criticized it for the following reasons." The only reason for excluding such a section would be if the "controversial" position falls under WP:FRINGE, which does not seem to be the case here. As such, you need to work with the other editors to find a way to get some form/portion of this information in the article, not just outright reject it. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

::I understand. It is not my intention to delete the paragraph altogether but I did not know what to put in its place that could be well referenced and encyclopedic. Maybe such a sentence as what you suggest would be a good start. I'll discuss that in the talk page. Arcillaroja (talk) 06:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

I hope that you had a good New Year celebration. Please could you contribute to developing the articles on Western Europe and Eastern Europe. User:Rejedef needs help.--Toddy1 (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi there! Yeah it was a good night and now I have a bit of a hang over... I'll try to help in the mentioned article. I would appreciate other users with different backgrounds taking part in it as well because it seems that these articles are only interesting to those that personally feel patronized by them. Arcillaroja (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello!

I think I made a mistake yesterday in THE WESTERN WORLD. Would you mind to change that the CE countries had limited access due to Cold war for 45 years, please?

You said you are born in Spain. Which Spanish language do you speak: Català or castellà?

--Gironauni (talk) 12:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

:Hi Greg!

:Thank you for editing the talk pages so courtly!!!Arcillaroja (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

:: No problem, anything to try to cheer you up -- since you're still obviously obsessed with these articles after years. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 10:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there! I have no intentions to start an edit war with you as such but I wonder why you just unexplained reverted my edits about the above subject considering that I too started a discussion about it on the talk page. Lemme know! Thanks Szaboci (talk) 22:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for your edit on Central Europe. My edits on that article have been neutral and I believe only beneficial to the page. However, I have had trouble with Powertranz, who has been continually reverting my edits without any valid explanation whatsoever. He has been doing the same on the article about Poland, where I have made an edit that removed bias fron the article, but others seem to have joined in with him there. If you want to help with the situation about Poland's article, please join in the discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Poland#Central.2FEastern_edit_war

Regards,

Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Arcillaroja! I undid your revision [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=595043585&oldid=594980042] as there's been a longer dispute over the subject. Regards -- Bosyantek (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

:Actually, Bosyantek, the content and references you removed were not gratuitous [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&diff=595043585&oldid=594980042 as your edit summary would suggest]. The issue of whether Poland is Eastern or Central Europe has long been the subject of contention in English Wikipedia, whereas Hungary and the Czech Republic have not been a bone of contention. Given these circumstances, it is useful to note discrepancies in perception and offer WP:V and WP:RS for the edification of the reader. Thank you for refraining from POV content blanking without discussion in the future. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on :Antoni Gaudí. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arcillaroja. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Arcillaroja. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. Legobot (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republican Party (United States). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hafte Tir bombing. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andy Ngo. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim Pool. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi {{safesubst:BASEPAGENAME}}! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{tlx|1=Frs user|2={{subst:currentuser}}|3=limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

{{tmbox

| image = none

| imageright = 40px

| style = background-color: #ffffff;

| text = Your feedback is requested{{^}} at Talk:Piers Robinson on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

}} Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested{{^}} at Talk:Politics of Australia on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Kyiv on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:European Parliament on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Odal (rune) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Stepanakert on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:2019–2020 Hong Kong protests on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Éric Zemmour on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Tucker Carlson on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.