User talk:Ausganger

I have edited the page for Anthony AUSGANG AND BROUGHT IT UP TO WIKIPEDIA STANDARDS.

:Actually you haven't. You need a lot more substantial referencing. See guide below. Have a look at this and compare with your referencing. The material in the bibliography should be used for inline citations, complete with page numbers etc. Ty 01:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Guide to referencing

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: center; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em; font-size: 100%; background: #ffefd5;"
style="background-color: #f90;" | Using references (citations)
style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" style="text-align: left;" |

Help another user by posting this to them. Put {{subst:refstart}} on their talk page or a relevant article talk page.

Alternatively, use the link WP:REFB, which goes to a help page.

I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. If you need any assistance, let me know. -- Ty 01:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

;Good references

A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, and authorised web sites. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is original research (e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research), or another wikipedia article.

;Inserting a reference

The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section (unless it already exists). This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:

:==Notes and references==

:{{reflist}}

The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):

:            

Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.

;Test it out

Open the edit box for this page, copy the following text (inserting your own text where indicated), paste it at the bottom of the page and save the page:

:==Reference test==

:This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.Reference details go here

:==Notes and references==

:{{reflist}}

(End of text to copy and paste.)

It should appear like this:

:;Reference test

:This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.Reference details go here

:;Notes and references

:{{reflist}}

;Information to include

You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For an online newspaper source, it might look like this:

:Plunkett, John. [http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1601858,00.html "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying"], The Guardian, 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.

When uploaded, it appears as:

:Plunkett, John. [http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1601858,00.html "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying"], The Guardian, 2005-10-27. Retrieved on 2005-10-27.

Note the single square brackets around the URL and the article title. The format is:

:[http://URL "Title of article"]

Make sure there is a space between the URL and the Title. This code results in the URL being hidden and the title showing as a link. Use double apostrophes for the article title (it is quoted text), and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). Double square brackets round the name of the paper create an internal link (a wikilink) to the relevant wikipedia article. Apostrophes must go outside the brackets.

The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the [http://www.archive.org web archive] in case the link goes dead.

;References not online

You can use sources which are not online, but which you have found in a library or elsewhere—in which case leave out the information which is not relevant. The newspaper example above would be formatted like this:

:Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27.

When uploaded, it appears as:

:Plunkett, John. "Sorrell accuses Murdoch of panic buying", The Guardian, 2005-10-27.

Here is an example for a book:

:Charmley, John (2006). The Princess and the Politicians, p.60. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.

When uploaded, it appears as:

::Charmley, John (2006). The Princess and the Politicians. Penguin Books Ltd., London. ISBN 0140289712.

Make sure you put two single quote marks round the title (to generate italics), rather than one double quote mark.

;Date format

These formats are all acceptable for dates:

:2005-01-27

:27 January 2007

:January 27, 2007

;Citation templates

You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference

;Same ref used twice or more

The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the code:

:Details of ref here

The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:

:

You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them. The quotes around the name are optional unless there is a space in the name.

You can see multiple use of the same refs in action in the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Bowyer_%28artist%29&oldid=179436485 William Bowyer (artist).] There are three sources and they are each referenced three times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.

;Alternative system

The above method is simple and combines references and notes into one section. A refinement is to put the full details of the references in their own section headed "References", while the notes which apply to them appear in a separate section headed "Notes". The notes can be inserted in the main article text in an abbreviated form as seen in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harriet_Arbuthnot&oldid=165667213 Harriet Arbuthnot] or in a full form as in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brown_Dog_affair&oldid=179000868 Brown Dog affair.]

;Further information

More information can be found at:

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Anthony Ausgang]]

Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg A tag has been placed on :Anthony Ausgang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, {{#if:|at {{{2}}}|such as at articles for deletion}}. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Ausgang.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Ausgang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)