User talk:Aymatth2#top

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(30d)

| archive = User talk:Aymatth2/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 17

| maxarchivesize = 100K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 3

}}

{{archive box|style=width:30em;|

{{cols|colwidth=11em|rules=yes}}

{{colend}}

}}

Please add new messages to the bottom of the page. I will try to respond within a few days.

__TOC__

Lakes in Antarctica

  • {{On AFD|Jennings Lake}}

I did {{On AFD|Lake Patos|Carmen River}}, helping the disappearing ducks.

Tag! You are it. ☺

Uncle G (talk) 22:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

:Ok. I already did thousands of stubs on the other half of Antarctica. This one looks like yet another merge and redirect. Step one is to find an online map... Aymatth2 (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Places with a past

  • {{On AFD|Oyster Bay, Tanzania}}

I don't know whether you'll enjoy countering systemic bias on this one and putting the old pre-independence history in; with Harry L. Ford and the police station that couldn't go in the shopping centre.

But here it is, in case you might.

There appear to be a few more sources, beyond what I mentioned, on how the area has changed post-independence.

Uncle G (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Nauroz Khan]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Nauroz Khan, to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Nauroz_Khan significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nauroz Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

  • {{cite journal|journal=India Quarterly|volume=77|issue=3|date=September 2021|title=The New Baloch Militancy: Drivers and Dynamics|author1-first=Shakoor Ahmad|author1-last=Wani|pages=479–500|jstor=48650549|publisher=SAGE}}

    {{harv|Wani|2021|p=481}}

  • {{cite book|title=The Politics of Ethnicity in Pakistan: The Baloch, Sindhi and Mohajir Ethnic Movements|volume=57|series=Routledge contemporary South Asia series|author1-first=Farhan Hanif|author1-last=Siddiqi|publisher=Routledge|year=2012|isbn=9780415686143|chapter=Balochstan}}

    {{harv|Siddiqi|2012|pp=62–63}}

  • {{cite book|title=In Afghanistan's Shadow: Baluch Nationalism and Soviet Temptations|author1-first=Selig S.|author1-last=Harrison|publisher=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace|year=1981|isbn=9780870030291}}

    {{harv|Harrison|1981|pp=28–29}}

Uncle G (talk) 09:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your essay about content assessment

Thank you for explaining the process and rationale behind the process. I found your essay really helpful.

"One may question the value of developing an article to GA or FA status in an attempt to satisfy the serious student or researcher. Would any serious student or researcher use Wikipedia? Perhaps getting more articles up to C class, meeting the needs of most readers, gives greater payback."

This is such a valuable perspective to me. I've made it my mission to expand stub and start class articles about literature, and I used to be very disappointed about the all the Cs I kept getting. This was a much needed reality check. Of course I'm still happy if I can get an article to B, but now I see how upgrading to C too is well worth my time and effort. --Adelequested (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:I am glad it was helpful. I admit to being a bit cynical about the rating process, though. I think the best we can do is try to develop accurate, useful articles, and pay no attention to the ratings. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)