User talk:B719603

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

Hello B719603

I corrected your latest posting. You are misleading with your edit's. New York State is very specific, via the criminal procedure law that most peace officer's are prohibited the use of firearms as listed in each subdivision . If the peace officer is required to use a firearm as part of their employment an agencies can issue a firearm in two ways, without requiring a firearm license like ( New York City Sheriff's office ) or required their peace officer's to obtain a Pistol License like ( Co-op City Public Safety ).

Just stating facts as listed by NYS Law.

Hello, this is B719603. I would like to point out that although it may your opinion that I am being misleading with my edits, this is not actually the case. The edits I made were cited, and were paraphrased from, and descriptive of, the criminal procedure law. You corrected nothing. What you are posting on the page does not match what you are saying here. Your edits imply that peace officers in general are prohibited from carrying firearms unless they get a license pursuant to cpl 400.00; this is not correct. I am stating facts listed in the cpl, You are not. Please do not change these edits or remove my citations again. Being a member of co-op city public safety does not make you an expert on criminal procedure law. B719603 (talk) 01:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

hello B719603

I noticed that you keep making edit's to the same wiki pages with your interpretation of NYS law. Please read nys criminal procedure law. As far as you questioning someone expertise like your about comment ... you just started making edit's this month. Please be respectful to fellow members, thank you

This is B719603. Again, I have included citations with my edits from the actual criminal procedure law, which I have indeed read. None of you have included citations in your edits, moreover, your edits appear to be simply removing relevant information and replacing it often with nothing, and other times with conjecture. Perhaps if you read the criminal procedure law or looked at my citations, you would be less confused on the matter. I think it should be your prerogative at this point to be more respectful, not mine, and to leave cited and relevant content alone. As for my statement in regard to expertise, it is not wrong, and I stand by what I said. If you keep removing relevant content and citations, I will keep replacing them when I have the time. B719603 (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Face-smile.svgWelcome B719603!