User talk:Bencylverni#top
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Spellenspektakel]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Spellenspektakel help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Tagishsimon (talk) 13:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:CardCon|CardCon]] (March 4)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CardCon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:CardCon Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RangersRus&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:CardCon reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
RangersRus (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
:Hi RangersRus, thanks for taking the time to review my submission. While the CardCon convention has only been hosted once, the next edition had already been planned. It's conjunction with the annual Spellenspektakel event makes it more than a one-time thing.
:However, due to the nature of the event (being a once-a-year convention), the only coverage I can provide is from right after last year's edition. I can provide a large number of external news sources if needed, but I tried to avoid listing all them as a reference and the basically said the same thing (general event coverage). Should I provide them anyway to provide "references that show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events)"?
:Thanks in advance for your feedback! Bencylverni (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:CardCon|CardCon]] (April 18)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CardCon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:CardCon Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BuySomeApples&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:CardCon reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
BuySomeApples (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Bencylverni!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC