User talk:Braxton C. Womack

File:Gatto zzz.gif

{{status|not done|Offline}}

{{busy}}

{{Usertalkheader}}

{{calm}}

class="infobox" width="100px"
align="center"colspan="2"|Image:Crystal Clear app file-manager.png
Archives
April – December 2018

bgcolor=

type=fulltext

prefix=User talk:GorillaWarfare

break=no

width=30

searchbuttonlabel=Search archives

No Country for Old Men

With due respect, the moral choices regarding the assessment and taking of found property is a central plot device for the film "No Country for Old Men." The previous "See also" section was added without any support or justification from the above text, and as a tangent was understandably reverted. However, that oversight was mitigated in the subsequent substantive edit. Please revert "See also" section.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.9.232.163 (talk) 23:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

:Hi, you were reverted because 1.) You didn't provide any reliable sources to back up the film exposing the "grey areas, consequences, and realism" involving misplaced property; as well as the "finders, keepers" approach being the central plot of the film. 2.) As mentioned by {{no ping|Dawnleelynn}}, per MOS:ALSO, the "See also" section should "reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic." Meaning something about lost property has no point in being included into that section. Also, most film-related articles do not have a "See also" section, unless it's an article including the characters from the film or something related to it, (i.e. Halloween / List of Halloween characters, Jurassic World / List of films featuring dinosaurs). Hope this helped explain things; let me know if you have any other questions. – Braxton C. Womacktalk to me! 03:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 37}}

NoahTalk 22:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

Why will you not discuss your concerns on the article talk page? You seem to be violating the very polices you claim to represent.Tomcaly (talk) 04:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Are you not going to partake in the very civil discussion? Is this not what Wikipedia policy dictates to have a cordial discussion to resolve a disagreement?107.26.180.9 (talk) 04:43, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

LM5

Sorry, I was using the LM5 page as a prompt for Avril Lavigne's "Head Above Water Tour", since they are both upcoming Sept 2019 tours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortal Aphrodite (talkcontribs) 22:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

:No worries! Just be sure you use the sandbox to make test edits like that. – Braxton C. Womacktalk to me! 22:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Days of our Lives: Rex and Sarah

His character profile on Wikipedia has to say "wife" instead of "spouse" because spouse doesn't cone through. It is nothing to do with me wanting it to say that. If you can find a way to make the template have it show up, then go for it. Otherwise it has to say "wife". Arjoccolenty (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

:It is fixed now — "spouse" was listed twice within the template, which is why it was not showing up. – Braxton C. Womacktalk to me! 01:52, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:5L-Track-5DAY.png

Thanks for uploading :File:5L-Track-5DAY.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

RfC

Hello. Please take a look at this discussion. Thanks. Bionic (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Mole Day!

6.022x1023

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Mole Day on the behalf of WikiProject Science.

{{col-begin}}

{{col-2}}

:What is this?

:Mole Day is an unofficial holiday celebrated among chemists, chemistry students and chemistry enthusiasts on October 23, between 6:02 a.m. and 6:02 p.m. This date is derived from the Avogadro number, which is approximately 6.022×1023, and the day is named after scientist Amedeo Avogadro.

:What you can do!

  • Participate in our and our sister WikiProjects
  • Expand articles listed here
  • Improve science articles
  • Sign the guestbook or place {{tl|User WikiProject Science}} on your user page.
  • Add this page to your watchlist to see what's occurring here

{{col-2}}

File:Amadeo Avogadro.png|200px]]

:Similar events

:See also

{{col-end}}

---------

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}

-------------

{{center|1=Sent by {{noping|Path slopu}} on behalf of WikiProject Science and its related projects.}}

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member,

This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 04:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)