User talk:Cantthinkofagoodname

Maybe this page will solve the mystery of AFC Aldermaston??

[http://www.fchd.info/AFC-ALDE.HTM Clue to the Club History of AFC Aldermaston]

Hey bud, how's it going? Was just reading the page on myelodysplasia, as my mum's just been diagnosed with it (bleak reading) and you'd mentioned you'd had it. Without wanting to intrude, hope you're better now. Proto||type 22:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi CTOAGN,

Thank you for the good luck. Your suggestion came as a complete surprise. Its really flattering to know that you think me capable, and your nominating me would be an honour. However, I don't think I'm ready for it yet, and there's a reason for that. I have hardly any experience with things like AfD and other discussions. I've been thinking that I should get more involved in the community and get to know these policies better..and adminship would definitely have to wait till that happens. Aabha (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

You seem to be working with alot of football articles so I thought I'd ask you this. It says on the to-do list on the Man Utd article that citation is required. Just wondering, what sort of things need citing, as surely some things are just fact and dont need it. Philc _T+C 21:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm a bit confused. I understand people are interested in everything about the lives of celebrities, which is what sportspersons have become now, but isn't there a limit to how much energy is devoted to explorations about and interest in things like the sexual orientation of players? Everyday somebody has some new rumour to add. I mean, it might be true, but shouldn't the focus of these articles really be the game? I don't know what to do about this recent addition to the Shevchenko article - Andriy_Shevchenko#Controversy. Nobody is ever going to find a 'real source' to any of it, unless of course the player in question decides to say anything. Should I keep on reverting everytime, saying that a source is required. Just wanted to be sure. Aabha (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. From what I can see, you seem like the sort of person who can judge when cleanup is done, so I'm happy for you to remove the cleanup tag if you feel that's justified. All the best SP-KP 22:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you with this..can you please delete :Image:Whitestripeonright.png? Messed up the file name. Thanks. Aabha (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

:Thank you. Aabha (talk) 20:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Thought I'd ask you this, since we've been talking a bit. I'm just getting started editing articles on Wiki, and I was wondering if you could read through an article about a local footballer which I recently improved considerably. I'm just wondering whether I've made any newbie mistakes. Also, how do I know whether I can use a photo or not? Is the best thing to do just to send the admin of the web page an email and ask him/her? (wanted to use [http://www.brann.no/index.php?valg=spiller&spiller=6 this] picture for the article.

Well thanks for the links you have given me...........I don't usually do much on the football articles but I saw the vanadalisation on the Manchester United page and decided to revert it back. I will try my hands on some football articles sometime, especially n Mohan Bagan, an Indian football club from Calcutta. Can you get me source for that?

--User:Unitedroad

Good job putting the official site back. It was silly to not be there. Feel free to delete this message after you read it. 2005 18:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I've put FIFA World Rankings up for peer review here and all of your comments on the article would be appreciated, I'm telling you this because wether true or not from your posts and edits etc. you seem a very comprehenisve and good editor of football related articles, and I'd appreciate your input on the subject. Cheers! Philc _T^E_C^I 16:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Please join the debate as to what makes football clubs notable at WikiProject Football. BlueValour 11:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I need you to view this page urgently. Your help in this matter would greatly be appreciated. If this deletion process is a success, it would start a major precedence and harm may even come to the Non-league football project as well. Thank You and spread this message to other users you know who are dedicated to this project! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 18:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

On the page of Galatasaray i saw a mistake but i cannot revert it becauce the page is under protection , in the Managerial area Yılmaz Gökdel was the manager in 1974-1975 season

could you fix this?

http://www.webaslan.com/kulup/antrenor.php

this is the official site of Galatasaray

here it says that Gokdel is coach for the 74-75 season :)

Johnny200 21 September 2006 (UTC)

This is to inform you that the project page you created above, :Wikipedia:WikiProject FA Cup finals, is currently being considered for deletion. So is :Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) matches for that matter. Another project, Wikipedia:WikiProject Football clubs, which has a project page on which you were one of the last active contributors, is being considered for deletion as well. I am currently going through all of the WikiProjects to put them on a project directory, and am, in the process, nominating those which have no activity for deletion. Nothing personal. Please feel free to follow the links on the project page to participate in the discussion. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 14:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi there,

I come to you asking for your help with helping me improve the Gilberto Silva article. I have been working on it for several months (quite slowly), but I'm now giving a final push to get it featured. I come to you because you managed to get Denis Law to FA status; so far the only footballer bio to manage this. Now obviously there are some major differences between Gilberto and Law; their nationality, one being retired etc. - but I think your feedback would be invaluable. Could you give the article a quick lookover to see if there's anything which you think could be improved? I am going to get the article peer reviewed, but I thought I'd let a footie-player-bio expert look at it first.

Thanks for any help you can give, and good luck thinking of a good name. All the best, -GilbertoSilvaFan 17:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

:Edit: looks like CTOAGN's last activity was in May - I'm not holding out for a reply! Never mind. GilbertoSilvaFan 13:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I need your wise opinion on the comments I made in this page. Your views in this matter would be highly regarded. Thank you for your time! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 16:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi there.

Just looking at the articles that span the history of MUFC. There appears to be no formula for how the periods are decided. For example, the period prior to 1945 covers a whopping 67 years, but the succeeding articles cover the following periods of time 17, 12, 2, and 7 years respectively.

I'm posting this comment on the project talk page but let me know if you have any thoughts on this.

I am currently researching a book on the history of the club from 1878 to 1910/11 (prior to the Old Trafford years), would you mind if I created this article (it would mean a re-edit of the 'pre-1945' one)? I will not create this until I hear back from youself or someone on the project page.

As a side note, I too am a Mancunian Red and 3 generations of my family lived in the area of Monsall Road. Hence I am hoping to get some insight into the club's early origins that are sadly negelcted by United themselves. My family was also connected with the Newton Heath LYR for many years and my great grandfather was a furnace stoker around the time of 1878.

Cheers

Robdav69 09:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello ! I am Bartek from Poland and I am interested in non-league football project . I am making an article about Tarant Wójcin - the team played in 6th level of Polish pyramid league system . Could you take a look on the article ? I know there is a lot of mistakes (English) . I am going to write more about this club.

Greetings from Poland

Bartekos 18:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the [http://www-appn.comp.nus.edu.sg/~seahruho/ research home page]. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

Hey there. Would you have any interest in contributing a suggestion or adding your support to the nomination of Derry City F.C. for featured article status? Cheers. Danny Invincible^Talk|Edits 02:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't think you remember me but anyways...the last message on my talk page and other numerous messages are being signed by some unknown user in the name of user:Fluence. So i'm getting confused as to who's sending me what. I believe this is vandalism and if it is...then it's going out of control in my case. Please look in the matter if you can-it's a requestVictoria Eleanor 16:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't bother it's all under control now.Victoria Eleanor 03:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading :Image:Denis Law signs for Manchester United.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target={{PAGENAMEE}}&namespace=6}} this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 22:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I have seen from your contributions that you haven't edited since 2006. If you are watching, : Denis Law has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/{{#if:{{{2. Woodym555 16:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Template:User fcum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

30pxTemplate:Footnotestext has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 15:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Inactive admin}}

Image:Information.svg

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Gardner (poker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)