User talk:Chainclaw#Game .22summery.22

Welcome!

Hello {{PAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

userpage

Hey there. I'd like to ask that you create for yourself a userpage, for the purely selfish reason that when I'm doing New Pages patrol, and I see a page created by someone whose userpage has a redlink, I think it to be the work of a newbie, and it takes me an extra minute to check it out and validate it as being genuine. DS 16:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

re: Super Bowl articles

Although I do not entirely 100% percent agree with every single detail such as the ones you mentioned, I will try to keep them (after correcting the spelling and the grammar of course). After all, most of those plays are covered on those 30-minute Super Bowl highlight shows of NFL Films. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah pluss some of them are just downright funny. The second quarter of Super Bowl XXII and the first quarter of Super Bowl XXVI played out like slapstick comedy--Chainclaw.

I need a favor

I just created a poor stub on the former Washington Redskins player Mark Murphy, I can't find much info on him though. I know you are good in expanding football profiles, Can you expand it. Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 01:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, the problem is that I checked goggle and there was too many Mark Murphys mostly about a jazz singer with the same name, and I also checked Pro Football Refernce and they only had the Mark Murphy who played for the Green Bay Packers. Thanks again --Jaranda wat's sup 02:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

For defensive players, you should check databasefootball.com, not PFR. Though I gotta admit Murphy was a little hard to find there because his name is spelled wrong for some reason

--Chainclaw

Bengals

Good catch on the second Bengals-Niners super bowl correcx.

That's what I get for copy editing at 5 am.

I'm a Bengals' addict, so I'll be tidying the page up a bit. No major changes, just grammar cleanup. Hope you don't mind. --docsophist 22:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

than

Please use than for comparison, and then for chronological reference (e.g. less than, more than, instead of then). 204.113.242.78 17:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

DYK nominations

Just a friendly reminder to make your DYK nominations at the bottom of the relevant date, per the instructions. BigHaz 22:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

DYK

class="messagebox standard-talk"
Updated DYK query

|On 10 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Max McGee, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Pete Johnson

You added to the Archie Griffin article that Griffin's 1973 breakout was in part due to Pete Johnson's blocking. However, Johnson did not become the Ohio State starting fullback until 1974. In 1973 the OSU fullback was Bruce Eliahttp://www.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/osu/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/records2. (And in 1974, Johnson was still splitting time with Champ Henson.)

Furthermore, singling out the contribution of any fullback minimizes the contribution of the terrific 1973 Ohio State offensive line, featuring All Americans Steve Meyers and Kurt Schumacher, and Heisman runner-up John Hicks.

-- 24.95.65.142 16:10, 4 Sept 2006 (UTC)

Super Bowl III Excessive Commentary

Chainclaw,

I'm new to Wikipedia and still "learning the ropes." I wonder if you could give me some guidance on what should be in the Super Bowl articles, and what constitutes "excessive commentary." I was trying to put things in context (maybe that should be in a separate section, not in the game summary?). The only deletion I take exception to is the reference to Hill's success against Braase, which I feel is critical to explaining the success of the Jets' running game, which in turn was critical to their victory. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65tosspowertrap (talkcontribs) 21:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC).

[[Rice/Poindexter Case]]

Hey, the link to the Fraternal Order of Police's statemtent about this case is down. Do you know if the page can still be accessed? I couldn't find it on the Way Back Machine, but it would be nice to have as the article is hard to NPOV. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Super Bowl XLII

While your enthusiasm is to be commended, it helps if you check your sources/facts before adding large sections; there were numerous errors in the info you posted on the Pats. Just to name the ones I saw off the top of my head:

  • Moss did not lead the league in yardage (he was second).
  • Jarvis Green is not a full-time starter on the DL; he held Seymour's place until Seymour was ready.
  • The Pats play in a 3-4 defense, not a 4-3, so they have inside linebackers, not a middle linebacker.
  • That fact aside, Mike Vrabel is an OLB, not an ILB. He can play ILB if the situation calls for it, but OLB has always been his natural position. [And, come to think of it, why mention Seau, Vrabel, and Thomas, but ignore Bruschi (and Colvin)?] Samer (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

:Again, let me reiterate: accuracy is important. Before you add material, especially if it was deleted, you should check to make sure that it is, in fact, correct and appropriate. As an example of correct: the Pats gave a 2 and a 7 for Welker, not a 2 and a 6 (you also misspelled "acquired"). As for appropriate: What does "immediately" mean in describing Moss' improvement? Is that material actually relevant to the article at hand? Samer (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

:(1) You're assuming that I listed everything that needed to be changed. I didn't (for example, the proper link is to Benjamin Watson, not Ben Watson). (2) I also added several pieces of factual information, which you removed in your revert. (3) The other reason for the heavy editing is that the tone should be more encyclopedic. Samer (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

::Yes, I'm the one that keeps removing it. My basic objection to that is the logical fallacy known as post hoc ergo propter hoc--"after this, therefore because of this." In other words, just b/c the Pats acquired Welker and Moss doesn't necessarily imply that they had anything to do with the Pats' improved passing game. I know that the obvious response is "How can you argue that?", but from the standpoint of verifiability, it's something that needs to be addressed. Samer (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Miami Shootout

Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources here] for how to cite sources. I doubt the gun zone is a reliable source, and I suspect the [http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/shooting.htm actual FBI inquiry] trumps Ayoob's inaccurate work. Geoff B (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Chainclaw, are you logging out to continue to edit the article as IP address 75.179.176.227? Geoff B (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

30px Hello Chainclaw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current {{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}} article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Billy Joe Dupree - {{findsources|Billy Joe Dupree}}
  2. Louis Breeden - {{findsources|Louis Breeden}}

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Game "summery"

I reverted your addition to Super Bowl XLV once again because it seems to be entirely your own (unsourced) commentary. Furthermore, there is no reason to remove the scoring infobox. I would also like to remind you that summary is spelled with an "a", not an "e". ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 05:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:I have reverted as well. You're removing valid sourced content and adding massive quantities without sources. N419BH 05:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

ITN: [[Super Bowl XLV]]

{{tmbox

|tyle = notice

|small = {{#ifeq:|yes|yes}}

|image = File:Gnome globe current event.svg

|text = On 7 February 2011, In the news was updated with {{#if:

|facts

|a news item

}} that involved the article{{#if:|s}} Super Bowl XLV{{#if:

|, {{#if:||and}} {{{4}}}

}}{{#if:

|, {{#if:||and}} {{{5}}}

}}{{#if:

|, and {{{6}}}

}}, which you {{#if:

|created or substantially updated

}}{{#if:substantially updated

|substantially updated

}}. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

}}

In the news

{{tmbox

|tyle = notice

|small =

|image = File:Gnome globe current event.svg

|text = On 4 February 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Super Bowl XLVII, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

}} --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569362011 your edit] to 1985–86 NFL playoffs may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:1985–86 NFL playoffs|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • ]. Cleveland later marched 82 yards in 10 plays, mainly on the strength of their ground game, with {{red|[[}}Kevin Mack rushing for 12, Curtis Dickey picking up 9, and Ernest Byner's 15-yard carry

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570218909 your edit] to 1988–89 NFL playoffs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:1988–89 NFL playoffs|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • game for the first time in his 16-season career, fumbled a snap and Oilers defensive lineman {{red|[}}[Richard Byrd (American football)|Richard Byrd] recovered the ball. Strock sprained his wrist

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

NFL playoff articles

Regarding your reverts of my edits: The detailed content was split. Sections should now conform to a summary style per Wikipedia:Summary style. You don't have detailed game summary content on the Super Bowls on those pages either. Zzyzx11 (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

--Playoff games have detailed information when its available. Separate game articles do not necessitate lack of detail in the playoff pages. That would make no sense.--Chainclaw (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

::I guess we have a different interpretation about what should be split, and what should remain on the main playoff page. Since it's currently just me and you in this disagreement, I will not go into a further edit war with you. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 00:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

I just don't see why the playoff page can't have any detail simply due to it being available on a separate article. If you want to re-write the summaries in the playoff pages some so they sound more distinct then the separate game articles, go right ahead. Just don't reflexively remove everything.--Chainclaw (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572595770 your edit] to 1988–89 NFL playoffs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:1988–89 NFL playoffs|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • with a 58-yard kick. Buffalo then went three-and-out, and Bengals receiver Ira Hillary returned {{red|[}}[John Kidd]'s 50-yard punt 15 yards to the Bills 40. Three plays into their ensuing drive,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606979418 your edit] to 1994–95 NFL playoffs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:1994–95 NFL playoffs|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

  • control of the game, but Detroit finally caught a break as [Mel Gray (return specialist)|Mel Gray]{{red|]}} returned the ensuing kickoff a franchise playoff record 68 yards to the Packers 18-yard line.
  • |weather= {{convert|59|°F|°C}}, fog with heavy rain{{red|)}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar for your contributions

style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|100px|100px}}

|rowspan="2" |

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | The Writer's Barnstar

style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your outstanding edits to Super Bowl 50 which allowed it to be added to WP:ITN, I award you this barnstar. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

[[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Chainclaw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

August 2017

Image:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to :Rocky Balboa (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 01:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Chainclaw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Chainclaw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances|1965 Gothenburg Disappearances]] (February 12)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=CoolInterestingStuff and MysteriousUniverse are Buzzfeed-tier sources. Try searching for primary reports to start e.g. in local newspapers then branch out.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1965_Gothenburg_Disappearances Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1965_Gothenburg_Disappearances reviewer's talk page].
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| alt=Teahouse logo

|

Hello, Chainclaw!

Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances|1965 Gothenburg Disappearances]] (March 31)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Duke of Nonsense was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Article does have potential, it just needs a few more sources in order to pass. If you need help, please refer to WP:CITE}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1965 Gothenburg Disappearances, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1965_Gothenburg_Disappearances Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Duke_of_Nonsense&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:1965_Gothenburg_Disappearances reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Duke 16:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[1999 Loomis Truck Robbery]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg 1999 Loomis Truck Robbery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

  • If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=1999_Loomis_Truck_Robbery help desk].
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for [[Super Bowl LIV]]

{{ivmbox

|1=On 3 February 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Super Bowl LIV, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. P-K3 (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

|2=Ambox current red.svg

|imagesize=50px

}}

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

40pxHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Super Bowl XLI]]

Super Bowl XLI has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)