25px Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits{{#if:Rickrolling|, such as the one you made to :Rickrolling,}} did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
::Seriously, you don't need to welcome me to Wikipedia. This was not at all self-promotion. Just because the tweet was one of mine... ConnorJack (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
:::Sup Stew. Didn't even realize it was you. You'll need a source for this 'tweetroll' thing. –xenotalk 19:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
::::Sorry, that's just part of the template. In the edit history, you wrote "It is an example from me." Pretty sure that counts as self-promotion. Wikipedia is not for something you made up in a day. Find a reliable source about "tweetrolling" and then we can discuss adding it in the article. Oh, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rickrolling&diff=304534563&oldid=304534131 another editor] also reverted your additions. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
:::::LOL @ WP:MADEUP!! How do you think Microsoft was started? How was Wikipedia started? Somebody thought it up. Nevertheless, i'm not getting into an edit war ConnorJack (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
::::::Come on Stew, you know better than this. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. –xenotalk 19:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Yeah, but I just thought that "tweetrolling" is an effective way of rickrolling ConnorJack (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
::::::::Did you make it up though? For one thing tweetroll is already being used to refer to something else (analagous to a blogroll) –xenotalk 19:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)