User talk:Deepfriedokra#Peng Shuai

I wrote my first article about a unique topic and it got deleted by you I think.

I wrote it aboit this company here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2024/07/06/tiktokers-push-facial-gum-for-chiseled-jaws-but-wheres-the-evidence/

this is Stronger Gum's website:

https://www.strongergum.com/

here is additional citation for the founder's story:

https://www.unrealinternet.com/rockstars/founder-portraits/the-founders-series-decembers-uk-founders-building-businesses-that-matter-not-just-profit%20 Veetwikicreations (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Veetwikicreations}} Thanks for your note. Please read the deletion notice I left on your talk page. The links you have posted here do not meet the requirement for significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Once again, please read the notice I left on your talk page. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I've just declined {{UTRS|98962}}, and wonder whether you think removing UTRS access would be a good idea. 🤔 JBW (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|JBW}} Oh. Them again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

::{{done}} -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:: 👍 JBW (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hiya, on 30 Dec -23 you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=157324795 renewed] this user's IPBE for another year, and at the same time set their EC status also to expire in a year. Given that the EC was previously permanent, I assume that was a clerical error, or was there an actual reason for it? They've queried this, and in response I've set the EC as permanent. Let me know if I shouldn't have, and I'll revert. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|DoubleGrazing}} Looks like a misclick. Thanks/ -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I deleted the business link(s) and submitted for review. I read your message. I am NOT intentionally breaking wiki rules. I am trying to learn. Lbarnett777 (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Lbarnett777}} Please read the messages I left on you talk page. Including the information linked in the messages. It is improved, but still needs work. When it is ready, click the submit button. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

But some of the poorest and shoddy work that I have seen for a long time. Thank you for blocking them. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:49, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Timtrent}} You're welcome. I love to rock-and-roll. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::These people spend so much time and energy learning how to write ad copy they don't realize how easy it is to see. I've been seeing and reading ads for mumblety-mumble years. It's like they stand up and wave at me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:::Schlacke ist. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::::I used to write advertorial and press releases. They're so easy to spot.

::::That German tag must be good idiomatic slang. Google gets me "Slag is" but that doesn't really work 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:37, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::Schlock. Tripe. Trash. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey, Fritter. When you moved User:Lbarnett777 to Draft:Heather Brazell Hill, it looks like you left the userpage as a redirect. Was that intentional? Bishonen | tålk 10:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC).

:{{yo|Bishonen}} Yes. Probably no lpnger needed. Just wanted them to be able to find it after I moved it. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::Will you take a look at my draft and see if it is acceptable so far? Lbarnett777 (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:::{{yo|Lbarnett777}} Thanks for asking. What jumpss out at first is the use of her first name. Needs to be last name. First name is too familiar. Not sure she meets the relevant notability requirement, WP:NPOL, so will need to meet WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:GNG. Subjects of articles must meet inclusion requirements with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. You can also request help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.Hope this helps. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

I have declined {{UTRS|101356}}, but I've also left a comment there which you may like to consider. JBW (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

: I thought I had declined it, but it turns out that I didn't. However, you still may like to consider my suggestion. JBW (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|JBW}} Ah, more schlock. how delightful. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

::Meh. I like to try to give them three tries before banning. Perhaps they will make a surprisingly to the point response to me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:52, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

::: OK. I wasn't sure myself about it, and I'm happy to accept your decision. If you mean 3 tries at UTRS, then obviously we aren't there yet, but if we count both UTRS and talk page, then we are up to 4 appeals which just say "I'm so incompetent that I can't even use ChatBot to write an appeal, let alone write one myself", and nothing else. 🥴 JBW (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Five}}

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

{{hat|Thanks, y'all, but I try to avoid ANI'esque dramaz. Please work it out, seek WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION, and so forth. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)}}

{{u|Mikeblas}} has [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WINC_(AM)&diff=prev&oldid=1284292798 removed] multiple sources from many pages, in my case WINC (AM). I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikeblas&diff=prev&oldid=1284501275 asked for his reasoning] behind the changes and he [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikeblas&diff=prev&oldid=1284504390 this was his reply]. I have read the discussions linked in his response, but find nothing that says the linked sources should be removed. The discussions really die off before they reach any form of a conclusion.

Mikeblas seems to be using Wikipedia's COPYVIO rules against another website. I've never heard of our rules being used to determine if another site is in violation of COPYVIO. Regardless, the site in question, worldradiohistory.com, links scans in PDF format, of radio and television magazines, almanacs, and yearbooks dating back to the 30s. The website has been linked on the WINC (AM) page since 2014 with no issue.

Per my restrictions, I am not allowed to rock the boat, so I am handing your oars on this one. Help? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Deb}} I think it is that knows more about copyright than I ever will. Perhaps she can help us with this. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::Oh, I'm no expert on that topic at all. However, it sounds like Mikeblas's reasoning is correct. The fact that a site has been used as a source in the past without any obvious problems is not really relevant. How about discussing this at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard? That's what Mikeblas should really have done first. Deb (talk) 08:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks. {{ping|Neutralhomer}} RSN then. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::::I think it's important to point out that {{u|Neutralhomer}} has significantly misrepresented my actions. They say that I {{tq|removed multiple sources from many pages}}, but that's simply not true. What I actually did was remove the URLs (and related parameters) from several references.

::::For example, the WINC article had this reference:

::::

::::

::::{{cite book

:::: |url=https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1941/1941-02-10-BC.pdf

:::: |title=Broadcasting

:::: |date=February 10, 1941

:::: |access-date=December 1, 2013

:::: |publisher=Broadcasting Publications

:::: |page=29

:::: |archive-date=June 21, 2020

:::: |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200621222839/https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1941/1941-02-10-BC.pdf

:::: |url-status=live}}

::::}}

::::

::::

::::and I removed the url= parameter because it links to apparent copyvio. With that parameter gone, the url-status, archive-date, archive-url, url-status, and access-date parameters are all superflous. The reference was edited, but certainly not removed. Here's the reference left behind, with the URL and related parameters trimmed:

::::

::::

::::{{cite magazine

:::: |title=Broadcasting

:::: |date=February 10, 1941

:::: |publisher=Broadcasting Publications

:::: |page=29

::::}}

::::

::::

::::Many (!) references in this article were incomplete, containing a title for a book which was really a periodical, but not including a section or chapter name for the title and using the periodical name for the title instead. I've been fixing these errors and can probably finish that today. Some of the references also fail verification. And really, that's the problem here: in order to verify the citation, an editor is obliged to download copyvio content themselves through the supplied link. That's very uncomfortable, and I think it's one of the secondary reasons the WP:COPYVIO policy says that links to copyvio aren't acceptable.

::::Next, {{u|Deb}} says {{tq|That's what Mikeblas should really have done first}}. But I guess they didn't read the provided context: fact is that posting at Wikipedia:Reliable Sources/Noticeboard was what I did first, almost two years ago. I linked to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407#help with link spam to copyvio references at worldradiohistory.com conversation in my response to Neutralhomer, which they linked here.

::::I also linked to the current conversations at other locations in my response, again previously linked here by Neutralhomer:

:::::* Wikipedia:Teahouse#resolving links to copyvio used in references

:::::* Wikipedia:Bot requests#bot to remove links to copyvio material used in references

:::::* Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#concerns with wides-pread use of links to copyvio material in references

::::Note that each of these conversations (and also the original WP:RSN conversation, too!) suggested that I bring up the issue at some other different forum. It is frustrating that so many people believe the conversation should be where they think it should be, and not where it is. Now, the conversation is spread out among six different locations, counting this user talk page. -- mikeblas (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC){{hab}}

{{hab}}

File:DFO_facade_01.JPG

File:DFO chimney 01.JPG

File:Communication IMG 2671 (2).JPG

Just [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_recall/Gimmetrow#c-Deepfriedokra-20250424135900-Deepfriedokra-20250424120100 seeing this]. Not sure if it was recent, but it's never easier regardless. My condolences to you and your family. Star Mississippi 20:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Star Mississippi|}} Thanks you. It has been ten years. I was out for about 7 months prior and about 2 years and a half after. It was talk page messages that pulled me back.-- Deepfriedokra (talk)

Hello Deepfriedokra,

I appreciate you posting on my talk page. I found out that the page Mike Amiri has been vandalized, so I tried to put the promotional content on the vandalizer's user page as compensation. I am not very familiar with Wikipedia or its policies and did not realize that promotional content cannot be added to one's user page either. Thank you for helping me on Wikipedia. If you have advice for me, I would appreciate it. HwyNerd Mike (contribs | talk) 20:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|HwyNerd Mike}} Thanks. No problem. I was a bit confuesd at first. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Any tips on how to make pages faster? DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|DarkHorseMayhem }} Not really. I've always written very slowly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

::How long does usually take you to make good written sourced well article? DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

:::once I have found sources, a few days. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

I've commented at {{UTRS|102752}}. JBW (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|JBW}}I will cheerfully restore top page access. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:: 👍 Obviously whether it will do any good remains to be seen, but I don't see any reason not to give them a chance. JBW (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

By the way, in case you wondered, "je" was a typo for "me". The fact that it's a word of similar meaning in another tongue was pure chance. JBW (talk) 20:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|JBW}} She has come a long way. Oh, I typo all the time -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Recently,your admins delete my articles that l don’t understand why,and l never use it as a promote or web hosting,please answer me and give an explanation,thanks. Infomationprovider1 (talk) 01:06, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:You may not use Wikipedia to promote games or anything else. Userpages aren't free webhosts for game guides either. I agree with the deletion of your userpage, please stop trying to use Wikipedia that way. Acroterion (talk) 01:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::{{yo|Infomationprovider1}} Please read the deletion notice I left on your user talk page. Please follow the links contained therein and read that information thoroughly as well. I see you recreated that after I left the deletion notice. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Ok,thanks,which types are not allowed type of articles. Infomationprovider1 (talk) 08:24, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::@Acroterion@Deepfriedokra

::It is not a game guide,it is just a general preview of the game,not promoting the game,and “games” can be educational,for example,”Minecraft”is also a game,but you won’t say that is a game guide,l am just providing the general information of the game,not web hosting,and also,l think the Wikipedia is for every information that is not harmful to the community,please review what l had said and reconsider,just because it is a game,it does not mean that l am using it as a game guide,maybe the first article l did use it as a guide,but the second article has no guiding words or phrases,it is just a general article,if you think that it is a game guide,please provide the specific details of which l use as a game guide in my second article,thank you for your attention! Infomationprovider1 (talk) 08:35, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Wikipedia is not a place to merely provide information about anything- Wikipedia articles summarize what independent reliable sources say about a topic, not merely tell about it. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::::@331dot

::::What is the definition of reliable sources? 218.188.55.188 (talk) 08:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Please click the words "reliable sources" in my previous message. And remember to log in when posting. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Ok Infomationprovider1 (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::::@331dot

::::l want to ask that,l have used reliable resources like Fad

::::dom,and l use a natural tone,if you think that it is not,can you providethe details that l missed Infomationprovider1 (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Than,what types of articles is allowed in wiki,is gaming not allowed,because suggested edits include that? Infomationprovider1 (talk) 08:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::You did not use any reliable sources in your now-deleted drafts. Sources that are user-editable, like other wiki-type websites, as well as Wikipedia itself, are not reliable sources.

::::::There are certainly many articles about video games(Super Mario Bros. Wonder) and even parts of video games(Mario), where independent reliable sources have provided significant coverage of the game(or part of the game) and that coverage can be summarized in an article. You just told us about the game without summarizing what others have said about the game. If you just want to tell the world about this game, you should use social media or another website with less stringent requirements(like a Fandom gaming wiki). 331dot (talk) 08:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

They are unable to write grammatical English Their edits on Ruler and the deleted edits make that clear. CIR block? Doug Weller talk 12:09, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|Doug Weller}} May come to that. And it frustrates me that they either cannot or will not read and heed the helpful links in the deletion notice I left. SMDH. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:38, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::We'll see. Editors shouldn't have to correct all an editors edits, so if they don't catch on... Doug Weller talk 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Yep. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi... I have nominated the AN/MPN-14K article for deletion. There is a current discussion about the nomination here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AN/MPN-14K Mobile Ground Approach System. Since you have done some editing to this page (possibly a long time ago), I want to invite you to chime in with your thoughts on the deletion there. Thanks. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 17:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)