User talk:FMAFan1990

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know I did a rollback on your edit to Judy Garland - not consider it vandalism or be mean, just that information is unrelated to Garland's life (who is the current owner of her films is a bit trivial to include in her biography). No offense taken, I hope. --Ozgod 13:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

24px Please refrain from removing the header or making bad edits at the Wikipedia Sandbox. You are free to edit the sandbox, but please leave the header alone and do as it asks you to.

Don't replace {{tl|prod}} tags once they have been removed from an article (like you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Killdozer_%28bulldozer%29&diff=prev&oldid=135927668 here]). Anyone can contest a proposed deletion; the system is not for controversial deletions, and once the tag's been removed, please don't replace it. You can nominate the article at articles for deletion instead if you want it deleted. Hope that helps! --ais523 16:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

:Yes, that's what I was complaining about. You mustn't replace removed prod tags, as that's the method provided for in policy for contesting a prod; a {{tls|prod}} tag indicates that nobody has objected to the deletion, and its removal indicates that someone has. See WP:PROD for more details. --ais523 13:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock-auto|1=66.61.58.175|2=repeated vandalism from this range, sorry|3=Can't sleep, clown will eat me}}

FMAFan1990 05:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I have not vandalized articles ever. I never knew that IP range was used to vandalized articles.

leftHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on :Momentum Pictures, by {{#ifeq:1|1|TexasAndroid (talk · contribs),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because :Momentum Pictures seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting :Momentum Pictures, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate :Momentum Pictures itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. You appear to be active in various Guns N' Roses-related articles, would you be interested in supporting a Guns N' Roses WikiProject? If you are, sign your name here. If you know of anyone else who might also be interested in joining the project, please notify them – we need as many interested participants as we can get before the project goes ahead. Kind regards, –sebi 02:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment on this article, bitch - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_Damn_Me

Template:{{ucfirst:Infobox Drummer}} has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#{{{2. Thank you. --PEJL 13:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the Kiss singles template you created - I'm curious as to whether or not such a template is currently being used for other bands, since all the other ones I've looked at incorporate the singles in the main template. Thanks. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 11:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for the reply, I hadn't seen those. Looking at the ones for the Beatles and Aerosmith I do actually like the look of them better than the Kiss one (no offense intended). I don't suppose you'd be up for altering the Kiss one to resemble the others? --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 22:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• I can help with formatting, but recommend we stick with listing them by year. With templates like these, the idea is to make them as small as possible. Besides that, albums are already listed in the main Kiss template. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 23:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi I moved the above page and I see you've re-moved it to "Long Road out of Eden" . I was wondering why? On [http://www.eaglesband.com Eagles Official Website] its listed as "Long Road Out Of Eden" which I assume is the most authoritative source on the matter at the moment? I've left it where it is for now in case you know something I don't. Kelpin 15:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, can you leave a comment on Talk:Robin Finck about an ongoing debate regarding his discography, I've sourced the entire section but a user keeps removing it saying the sources aren't reliable (they are). Thanks, Bucketheader 22:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi FMAFan1990 I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FMAFanBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBotTalk 03:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:{{ucfirst:Infobox Guitarist}} has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#{{{2. Thank you. — Kudret abi 05:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, I didnt realise there were different fields etc. It's probably easier to go to WP:BOTREQ and let someone else write and run the bot, and pick a simpler task. Templates with different fields etc can be quite complex. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 06:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi FMAFan1990, about the AWB question, what I did was to first make a list of all transclusions of the template, and then use find and replace functions of AWB to replace the template name and related fields with the new ones. Of course I needed to check every edit to make sure that they look right and manually edit some templates for which the automated process did not yield expected results. Best, --Kudret abi 06:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

FMAFan1990, you may be interested in the request for an additional task that {{user|E}} has submitted for his bot. If approved, his bot will achieve your bot's purpose in toto, as {{tl|Infobox Guitarist}} has already been deprecated. If you're interested in deferring to him as the more experienced bot operator, the requested task can get off the ground that much faster.

Cheers! — madman bum and angel 12:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

:Please note that your bot request was denied by {{user|Mets501}}. However, {{user|EBot}} has been approved for trial and will perform the task you requested. For the BAG, — madman bum and angel 12:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Could you please see the request at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/EBot Task2 in which you suggested at WP:BOTREQ. More information is needed for the change as bot errors occured with the template syntax. Please comment or the request will not be fulfilled. — E ^talk_bots 11:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I'm well aware of your attempts. Updating all transclusions of {{tl|Infobox Band}} to {{tl|Infobox musical artist}} is indeed a very good idea. However, that change breaks the existing articles using the band infobox. It should be entirely possible to have a bot update the articles without breaking the band infobox. If you cannot figure out how to do this, perhaps you should leave this task to someone who can. I've reverted again. --PEJL 04:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

:Let's see if I can get some bot to make the {{tl|Infobox Band}} look like this:

{{Infobox Band
| band_name       =
| image           =
| caption         =
| origin          =
| country         =
| years_active    =
| actual_status   =
| music_genre     =
| record_label    =
| us_distribution =
| current_members =
| past_members    =
| website         =
}}

:FMAFan1990 04:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

::I'll just have the image size done away with entirely for now as well. FMAFan1990 04:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

:::Well, I wouldn't put too much effort into it, because any bot that can convert inconsistent formatting into that formatting, can just as easily convert it directly into {{tl|Infobox musical artist}}. However, a bot that would clean up existing formatting of musical artist infoboxes would be nice. Something similar is discussed for the album infobox here.

:::Another issue is that in most cases the image size that is in band infoboxes can just be dropped entirely when converted to the musical artist infobox. Band infoboxes need an image size to avoid using a full-size image (which is often way too big), but the musical artist infobox defaults to a suitable size, which is often better than the more or less random size in the band infobox. There are a few other such finer points that need to be kept in mind when converting these infoboxes. --PEJL 04:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

Luksuh 03:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you re-added Blood Sugar Sex Magik to the List of double albums, which I had previously removed. There was a discussion with a few editors on the talk page about guidelines for inclusion in the list, and one of the ones that was proposed was that if it takes up more than one unit of the intended format, then it's a double. Regarding BSSM, it was released in 1991, after compact discs had become the standard packaging method, so we can assume that the album was intended to be on CD. Once CDs became the most common product, an LP release of the same album generally had to be either trimmed down to fit on a single record, or issued as a double LP, so by that token, the list would need to contain a HUGE number of albums from the past couple decades, which fit just fine on a single CD. For a few examples, Tori Amos' Boys for Pele, The Cure's Kiss Me, Kiss Me, Kiss Me, and Soundgarden's Superunknown and Down on the Upside were all released on LP, and even though there are two pieces of vinyl in each of those, they really aren't double albums. — Wwagner 14:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Specimen-X, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specimen-X. Thank you. MarkinBoston 02:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

You asked about replacing infobox band on user pages and talk pages. Here's my advice (and what I've done myself in a few cases). On a user page, check if the user seems to be active. If so, leave a note on the user's talk page explaining and offering to help. Otherwise, if it's the user's main page, and they're using the infobox to refer to themselves, I think upgrading to the new template is ok. If it's on a user sub page, and it's some sort of work in progress, consider proposing the page for deletion ({{tl|prod}}) instead, because an inactive user is unlikely to ever complete the work. If you don't think a prod is appropriate or justified, then upgrading should be fine.

For transclusions on talk pages, I think subst: is probably the best choice in most cases. Generally, you don't want to mess with the historical record of old discussions. However, there may be cases where upgrading makes more sense. You'll just have to use your best judgement.

As for non-transclusions, I would leave talk pages alone, but for user pages, it can often be handy/helpful to replace the link in someone's "list of useful templates" with a link to the template they should be using. I've done this in a few cases, and nobody has complained. Yet. :) cheers, Xtifr _tälk 09:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

• I see your point, but I find it simply duplicates the information already listed, and the line-ups table makes it neat and easy on finding the proper information. Heavymetalis4ever 05:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

:*FYI, Heavymetalis4ever has been blocked as a sock puppet and his edit to the Iron Maiden band members article was reverted. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 14:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey. I've noticed you edit a number of band pages I do, very frequently and our tastes seem very alike. Just thought I'd stop by, and ask if you are a Van Halen fan at all? Their page was in dire straits 4 months ago and a lot of hard work is beggining to pay off...but I'm the only guy doing much. Not just the main page, but the whole WikiProject I guess (Michael Anthony, Alex Van Halen, Eddie Van Halen and some singles would all benefit from extra work)...it's almost there. Lend a hand if you like <3 (The Elfoid 08:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC))

Can you explain why you keep reverting to the US/UK labels? There was consensus to drop them (as well as some of the labels, Reaction released a single Geffen a compilation album and The Who were never on Atco) on the talk page. If you would like to state your case there and attempt to gain a new consensus then feel free. -MichiganCharms 06:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Most of the songs you listed as power ballad, (including Blurry) are not. Please do not edit their articles again and again. Thanks.--Ecgecg 21:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Consensus? What? Can you show me some links that support this argument? Well, I myself am a musician and pretty sure if Blurry is a power ballad, then most of today's rock songs are power ballads, too.--Ecgecg 09:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

25px Thanks for uploading :Image:SSBB box art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading :Image:Eye for an eye film poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_The_Beatles#Inactive.2C_or_have_just_popped_out_for_a_cup_of_tea... Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles] page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

leftHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on :Category:Water Pokémon, by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|{{{nominator}}} (talk · contribs),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because :Category:Water Pokémon has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting :Category:Water Pokémon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Category:Water Pokémon}} here] CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Have you got a source for that? Thanks. Alientraveller (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:{{ucfirst:Kiss singles}} has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Tenacious D Fan (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You worked on the article 1916 Cumberland vs. Georgia Tech football game. Nice job!

This article needs to have the references placed inline, and a tag has been placed on the article. I'd love to do it myself, but it would be easiest if the original resarchers would take care of it. Thank you very much!--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

25px Thanks for uploading :Image:Plane Daffy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

25px Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source{{#if:The Spirit of '76 (1990 film)|, as you did to :The Spirit of '76 (1990 film),}} is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} Cirt (talk) 02:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

:It is inappropriate to link to Amazon.com's product listing for the film in an attempt to use that as a source. Please do not add this material back again unless you can cite a secondary source that satisfies WP:RS and WP:V. Cirt (talk) 03:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Do you think your newly created articles have space for the copyright dates related to the cartoons? Agtax 04:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:70.119.13.45 insists on deleting a portion of the Warner Bros. Cartoons article when the studio was closed circa 1964 when animated titles for The Porky Pig Show was produced by Hal Seeger in New York. Steelbeard1 (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes folks, it’s "the beatles" or "The Beatles" time again. You might like to add your opinion (whatever it may be) on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Beatles#Straw_poll this page.]--andreasegde (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I rewrote the Warner cartoon part of the Associated Artists Productions article because it had misleading info. The a.a.p. library also includes the black-and-white Merrie Melodies made after Harman-Ising left Leon Schlesinger and Warner Bros. Steelbeard1 (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I wish you'd say why you twice reverted to sloppy language. —Tamfang (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The above edit violates our WP:NPOV. It's completely your opinion that they're speed metal. You need to back up all things on Wikipedia with reliable sources. Genres on Wikipedia are very touchy, and it's wise to discuss genre changes on an article's talk page before changing it at all and gain a consensus for your change. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 21:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Do not leave warnings on the talk pages of regular editors of long-standing good repute. Read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars and do yourself a favour. Take those ridiculous warnings off Wikilibs' page. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

:Well, looking at the edit you accused him over, he was reverting something which looked ridiculous, and something which you yourself have since reverted, so obviously Wikilibs had a point. Leaving "welcome to wikipedia" templates on his page makes you look like a troll. If you have issues with another editor that can't be sorted out, take it higher up. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

:There's WP:DR and WP:ANI, but I really doubt that Wikilibs is harrassing you. Your edits were very much WP:OR and unsourced as far as I can see. Making claims over music genres is a very hot subject right now, and references are all important. The speed metal edit you made at "Achilles Last Stand" was a real sweeping statement, unsourced and not really based on any concrete information at all. Nothing personal whatsoever, but I have to say I'd have reverted you as well. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I thought it might be. I remember thinking it a rather ambiguous debate that was rather boldly closed as delete. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 03:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I note that you indicated your change to the article was based on information from the book You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story. The problem with your edit is that the content is inserted in front of a citation to a different source and not the book you indicate. That implies that it comes from the Bob Thomas book Clown Prince of Hollywood: The Antic Life and Times of Jack L. Warner and therefore creates a false citation. If you have content from the book you note, then it has to be added based on its own merits and under its own citation. Since this is a featured article, it is really held to a higher level of citation correctness from the moment changes are made. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I invite you to look up the definition of "rock ballad" before you revert my revert to the 'Everybody Wants to Rule the World' page again, because this song is about as far from a rock ballad or power ballad or any sort of ballad as you can get. The very first line of the wiki article for rock ballad states that it is "a type of song typically characterized by having a slow tempo, long voiced notes, electric and/or acoustic guitars, and deemphasized percussion and bass." Given that the song in question is basically a dance track driven by a prominent synthesized bass line, I think it's pretty safe to say it falls outside the criteria. Thanks. --MemoriesFade (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Do you think it's time for Daffy Dilly to have an article like the other post-Blue Ribbon Cartoons? Agtax 23:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

That's done in MATLAB. The MATLAB code I used is on the image description page. Mike1024 (t/c) 20:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

An image that you uploaded or altered, :File:Falling hare bugs restored.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC) -mattbuck (Talk) 12:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

25px Thanks for uploading :File:The Old Grey Hare1 restored.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

You were reverted for two reasons. First, there is no source that proves that Warner Brothers intentionally spoofed Friday the 13th. Given that the animated film was made in 1990, they could have spoofed any aspect of the franchise (e.g., Jason, the first movie, the second movie, or the concept behind all of the movies), either way a reliable source is required to show that it is true. Finally, that is not something for the LEAD. The LEAD summarizes the article, it doesn't introduce new facts that are not mentioned anywhere else.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

:Warner never owned Friday the 13th, they only held distribution rights for international sales. That has nothing to do with the statement that you keep inserting their name into in the lead paragraph. Please read what it is saying, as it has nothing to do with international releases. Also, please stop inserting personal observations that are neither backed by sources (that is considered original research), nor immediately relevant to the article. New Line (before it went under) has owned Friday the 13th since the 90s. Warner Brothers bought New Line years go, so none of that is new news, nor does it affect this film in any special way that it needs to be noted.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

::Actually, you need to read the policy on verifiability and original research, namely the parts that say should you not provide a source for your information, or provide your own personal observation than your edits can be removed on the spot. If you continue to add unsourced, original research to the articles I will be forced to report you to an Administrator.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 06:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

:::What facts, you have provided no source to back up your claims. So, you have no facts. The "fact" that Warner Brothers is taking over distribution of New Line films is something for the New Line page, not something for all of the New Line film pages. Unless it was unique to Friday the 13th (which it isn't anyway), then it doesn't belong on the page. Simple as that. What reasoning to have for believing that it needs to be there instead on on the New Line page (with a source attached to it...that is the key ingredient that you are missing).  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 06:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

::::We do not assume good faith with regard to sourcing information. Again, this is clearly stated in the policy on verifiability. You MUST provide an actual source for your edits, not just say "it's out there somewhere" and be done with it. That isn't how Wikipedia operates.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 06:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

25px Please do not add content without citing reliable sources{{#if:If U Seek Amy|, as you did to :If U Seek Amy}}. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} — R² 01:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Che (film)#FMAFan and reverts over sentence. Thanks.   Redthoreau (talk)RT 01:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop using links to youtube, and please use edit summaries to explain your rationals. Thanks. — R² 01:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=If_U_Seek_Amy&diff=278871722&oldid=278846030], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=If_U_Seek_Amy&diff=278880166&oldid=278875883]. This violates our site policies including WP:NOR. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 04:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

:FMAFan1990, just because something seems obvious to you, doesn't mean that it isn't original research. It's when things seem most obvious to you is when you should take the extra time to find a reliable source before adding it to an article.. I mean, if it is indeed obvious, there should be plenty of sources, right? - Please keep this in mind when editing. You seem to be getting a track record for adding original research. --Versageek 05:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

::Please heed this comment by {{user|Versageek}}, along with the multiple above warnings by others for adding unsourced content to articles and violating WP:NOR. I agree with Versageek that this unfortunately does seem to be developing into a pattern of adding original research to articles. Cirt (talk) 05:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

:::If you wish to change the policy then that is a separate discussion you could start at Wikipedia talk:No original research. But the policy at present is established community consensus and violating it repeatedly may result in a block. Cirt (talk) 05:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

25px You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war{{#if:Watchmen (film)| according to the reverts you have made on :Watchmen (film)}}. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}} Darrenhusted (talk) 00:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

:Sourced but not notable. Darrenhusted (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Why did you Melodic hard rock to redirect to Glam metal?? they aren't equal!--151.49.231.143 (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

It appears [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coming_Undone_wit_It&diff=prev&oldid=282257442 this edit] with AWB malformed the templates? Kinda confusing, just though it'd let you know. Matty (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding links to "home advantage" to the bowl articles. Being near the bowl site does not necessarily amount to any advantage, so linking to it is inappropriate. This is why other users are reverting you. They should have raised this concern with you rather than consistently reverting, but they haven't, so I'm raising it now. Please stop because it adds a non-neutral point of view to the article. Thanks, either way (talk) 02:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I understand that you made a good faith [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007&diff=288264013&oldid=288259591 edit], however I've reverted you again for several reasons: trivia sections are discouraged, your edit was unreferenced (indeed where inserted, it separated another detail from its reference), appears also to be original research and lastly, does not add any information about the KAL 007 incident. Please discuss on the article talk page should you disagree, however please avoid starting an edit war by simply reverting again. Thank you. Socrates2008 (Talk) 13:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Just to clarify things, Miley Cyrus is with Walt Disney Records which is distributed in the UK by EMI. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding random trivia into artciesl . Please also stop adding original research, or statements without sources. Howard Johnson, for example, is not nicknamed "HoJo" because of the restaurants, but because of his name being HOward JOhnson. either way (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello. When contributing to an RfC, please keep discussion on the Talk page. The individual "view by..." sections are for those agreeing with the stated view. Thanks. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 19:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

• Another important point - and one which bit me in the past - is that a second editor needs to "certify" it. If there isn't a second signature (and a description of attempts to resolve the issue) in the section Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Either way#Users_certifying_the_basis_for_this_dispute by 48 hours after the page was created, an admin will probably delete it. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 13:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Although the discussion is still ongoing, I wanted to drop you a personal note to let you know I meant no offense from my comments. I know you mean well, and you're here to contribute to the encyclopedia. I just don't think you're going to get the results from this RfC that you're hoping for. If you don't mind me giving you some advice, sometimes, you just have to let things go around here. If you make quality contributions, they'll stay up, and if you have problems in the future once you've got a firm handle on what belongs in the wiki, just drop me a line on my talk page and I'll try and help. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 23:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Please avoid canvassing other editors, as you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neutralhomer&diff=288729013&oldid=288573055 here]. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I have been watching it and already people are coming to the defense of Either Way...he is essentially making fun of people who started the RfC on the talk page by asking others to "help them"...and I feel since I already know how it is going to go that it isn't worth my time to be wasted on someone like him. He will come out smelling like a rose to bash, intimidate, berate, belittle, and threaten us some more so I have decided not to comment on the RfC. Thanks for letting me know though. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

:What do I need to certify? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Just a heads up....Either Way's RfC was deleted for being "Improperly certified". - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

:I would recommend bringing back the RfC with proper certification and more information and linkage added. I would recommend that...but it would probably get deleted at the protest of Either way/Metros. I would let it go and if you have any problems with him in the future, keep track of those problems (with links) and then take it to RfC or ANI. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello,

Please can i ask that in the interest of courtesy and for ease of understanding when making edits like you have done to Doll Domination can you provide an WP:edit summary. this helps other editors identify what changes have been made to articles. I know myself that sometimes i forget to do so, but it does make things easier for other users if you can provide a brief summary of the additions/deletions or changes you have made to an article. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC))

I think you should probably back off Either way. Trivia is discouraged in articles, and he is just trying his best to keep articles in good shape. Your claims of "we don't need deletionists like you on Wikipedia" could be viewed as personal attacks. This might be a good page to read. ;) Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 22:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:Please heed this advice. Your comments in defence of your two friends are admirable but misguided. Then to say some of the things about Either way that you have done destroy your argument altogether. Please reconsider your comments. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Please provide evidence, as you have been asked, of the canvassing you alleged here, or withdraw the accusation. seresin ( ¡? )  21:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

25px You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war{{#if:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)| according to the reverts you have made on :Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)}}. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. {{#if:Please do not revert edits by SmackBot that format tags properly. Also, the acronym you are reverting ("SPT") is not a recognized acronym for Sony Pictures Television.|Please do not revert edits by SmackBot that format tags properly. Also, the acronym you are reverting ("SPT") is not a recognized acronym for Sony Pictures Television.|}} Sottolacqua (talk) 03:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

25px Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in :Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show). There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Please do not add acronyms or abbreviations of television shows or production companies to the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Your source at Hotel Room is coming up with "There is no bib Data Attached to this record." Can you fix this so it points to where you intend it to go? Thanks, either way (talk) 02:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

:It's gotta be better than [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hotel_Room&diff=prev&oldid=293223560 this]. What was the search you performed on there? (Like search terms and parameters). Maybe I can duplicate it and find a better way to cite it. either way (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm assuming good faith here with you, and I'd like to try and make you see why some editors are having problems with your edits. Much of what you are adding to the articles is either unsourced, trivial, or both. Just because some information exists on what production company may have distributed a show, or what other programs might be associated with their company, that doesn't make it worthy of inclusion in wikipedia. If you feel something like that is beneficial to the article, please don't take offense when someone else reverts or changes it later.

On Wikipedia, everyone here is free to edit everyone else's work. If that bothers you, then this wiki isn't for you. It happens to everyone, so please don't take it personally. Dayewalker (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

:In regards to this response [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dayewalker&diff=prev&oldid=293225404] where you wrote "knowledge is power," trivia isn't knowledge. It's trivia, which doesn't have any place in an encyclopedia. There are all sorts of facts and random bits of knowledge we could add to articles, but we don't because that's not what a general encyclopedia is for. There are specific wikis out there that can go into far greater detail, perhaps you'd enjoy working on one of those instead. Dayewalker (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I understand that you made a good faith edit. However, I've reverted your re-edit because the information is outdated and you failed to read the citation provided, among other sources. Please discuss on the article talk page should you disagree, however please avoid starting an edit war by simply reverting again. Thank you.

Kresblain (talk • contribs) 0:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been reported to AIAV for your consistent disruptive edits to Jeopardy!. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#User-reported]. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

30px This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again{{#if:Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism|, as you did to :Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}, you will be blocked from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=I was given a warning to stop, and I promise to stop. I should only be blocked if I don't heed the warning left by wuhwuzdat. FMAFan1990 (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)|decline=You've been highly disruptive and engaging in a number of blatant edit wars. Removing the report from AIV is not excusable. Be glad you're only blocked for a short period of time. You're heading for a much longer block if you continue edit warring and contentious editing. Toddst1 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)}}

The warning made about Jeopardy was in error. Please also note that I am being targeted continuously by others just because of my condition (Asperger's). FMAFan1990 (talk) 20:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:The advice you removed was far from useless. You are responsible for your own actions. We've had many great contributors with Asperger's, but you need to control it if you wish to be a positive contributor. Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 20:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

::my edit summary was merely a parody of others used by the contributor. FMAFan1990 (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove AIV reports upon yourself. The admins are quite capable of deciding if policies have been violated, and what - if any - action requires taking. I would comment that my first reaction to seeing you remove the report was to consider how long the block should be, because previously the only persons to remove a report were vandals attempting to stop or delay the inevitable sanction that their editing was likely to incur. Upon checking how long you had been editing Wikipedia, and the number and type of comments on this talkpage I decided upon a block of a few minutes to drive home the point that deprecating the process of AIV is really inappropriate (and to prevent further disruption in the future, of course). One "benefit", ironically, is that anyone who was minded to revert your edit will now find the report removed by a bot since you are now blocked... However, I would very seriously suggest that next time, if there is one, that you should simply note a comment under the report so the reviewing admin may consider it as part of the process. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The report was made in error. If anyone should be blocked, it should be ChrisP2K5, not only for false reports, but shoving polices down my throat. FMAFan1990 (talk) 20:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:Admins are quite capable of noticing these things - if people persist in making vexatious reports, they do get sanctioned themselves. If a report is invalid in future, please leave it so an independent party can make that judgment. ~ mazca ^t/c 20:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

::Oh, and mazca, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mazca&diff=prev&oldid=297233630 this] is way out of line. I do find sources for some of my edits (I had to work hard to find a source to add info to The Distinguished Gentleman for example). I do not like being slandered. FMAFan1990 (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:::I recommend you focus on your own conduct. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:::Indeed. I appreciate that neither of you are doing anything too massively bad, but equally neither of you are entirely innocent here. I'd recommend you both disengage from each other. ~ mazca ^t/c 21:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi FMAFan.. Just a disinterested third party here. I can tell you this much: between your removing comments you don't like from your own talk page and elsewhere, and that nonsense on your user page, you may as well hang out a sign that says "I am a disruptive edit warrior." If you want to continue editing here, you will need to change your approach. Wikipedia requires collaboration with other editors. Friday (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Why do you guys insist on there being four columns for the contestants? I instead favor three, and then Burt Reynolds as a note. And why do you keep undoing my revision??? Purplebackpack89 (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I am reverting your brazen disregard for consensus in the merger of "Higher Ground". You clearly did not read the talk page, where two discussions on the topic have found that the articles will remain separate. A simple, quick check of the talk page was all it took. Please refrain from executing any edits of this caliber without first checking talk pages as it could be in direct violation of pre-established consensus. NSR77 ^T 17:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

: Just a note to let you know that not all editors agree with above. It strikes me that if it is an article about a song then all the information should (generally speaking) be on the same page. The objection to the merge is probably more based on Wonder/RHCP and petty fandom than anything to do with the song or the contents of WP. As far as I know there is no direction regarding notability of versions of songs. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

::Perhaps you would like to add to the debate at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions--Richhoncho (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Your inclusion of Sony Music Entertainment in the category of "Former CBS Corporation subsidiaries" was reverted again because the name "CBS Corporation" is misleading. The corporation was called "CBS Inc." when CBS sold the record company to Sony. I would approve inclusion in the category in question only if the category name is renamed to "Former CBS subsidiaries." Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Falling hare bugs restored.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. +Angr 12:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your conversion of this article to a redirect without any notice or discussion. Please discuss on talk page of the article before converting to a redirect. -- Donald Albury 12:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey great info on the history of the Lions on local TV. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

I hope this was intended to be humorous [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:FMAFan1990&diff=prev&oldid=318585996], you understand you can't ban anyone from reverting your edits, don't you? By editing here, you allow any Wikipedia editor to edit or change your work, the same as all of the rest of us. I just wanted to let you know, in case you were serious. I couldn't tell. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

:On break to learn how to edit better. FMAFan1990 (talk) 02:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

::Sorry, it seems you blanked that while I was commenting. Good luck when you return! Dayewalker (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

While I detest Either way (aka: Metros) for all he stands for and think his adminship should be immediately removed, I have moved away from getting into heated, long-term conversations. I wish you luck on your RfC. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

In regards to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neutralhomer&diff=prev&oldid=318585754 this edit], RFCs do not work that way. As soon as you open it, anyone can add commentary to it. You cannot keep it closed to only people who support one side. either way (talk) 10:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated {{la|Untitled J.J. Abrams Project}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Porky pig thats all folks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Example&editintro=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:File:Porky pig thats all folks.jpg}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Current_requests&create=Request here] to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg A tag has been placed on :Scary Movie 5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, {{#if:|at {{{2}}}|such as at articles for deletion}}. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JDDJS (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:Gruesomegorillamrsgruesomebaby restored.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:Herr meets Hare restored.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:Herrmeetshare restored.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to :File:Little red riding rabbit title card.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy allows us to link to legal streamed copies of albums. It would be useful to draw up a guideline on how and when to link to such albums; however, there is concern that it may not be appropriate as the music would not be available in all parts of the world. Is the benefit of having access to the music for most users outweighed by the fact that some users will follow a link to find the music is not playable in their region? Your view would be helpful at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 02:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:BugsBunny-TheOldGreyHare restored.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Stagedoorcartoontitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Plane Daffy restored.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ring-Ring. Since you had some involvement with the Ring-Ring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Ryulong (琉竜) 15:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

== Sniffles article ==

Couldn't help noticing that in the body of the Sniffles article you credited three women (Gay Seabrook, Bernice Hansen, and Sara Berner) as voicing Sniffles in the 1939-46 theatrical cartoons, whereas in the infobox you credited two other women (Margaret Hill-Talbot and Colleen Wainwright). Why the discrepancy? Incidentally, in the IMDb.com listing of all 11 Sniffles cartoons, only Berner, Hansen, and Hill-Talbot (but not Seabrook or Wainwright) are credited as voicing Sniffles. However, in the IMDb.com article on Seabrook, she is so credited. What is the true story? Grammarspellchecker (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

We are currently having a discussion about whether or not this page should be removed or redirected. Feel free to add your opinions. Freshh (talk) 14:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BET Home Entertainment. Since you had some involvement with the BET Home Entertainment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BDD (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piano rock (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Katnipkollegeblueribbon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Drafteedaffytitlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing— Howard Beale (Network) —has been proposed for merging with Network (film). If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. WikiWisePowder (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:My Favorite Duck1 Restored.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:SouthParkSeasonHeader has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rock standard. Since you had some involvement with the Rock standard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Information.svg A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Barnyarddawg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 08:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That's all folks. Since you had some involvement with the That's all folks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:CBS Paramount Network TV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:The Old Grey Hare1 restored.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

30px

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :UNIVERSAL. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#UNIVERSAL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)