User talk:Fraction7

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as :Draft:VIYCE, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

VIYCE is available for public distribution. I only put it on YouTube for free because nobody was buying it. My article on my movie was unbiased and accurate. I am not trying to "get the word out," as you put it. Rather, I am trying to make Wikipedia as complete as possible, since Wikipedia has no article for my film as of yet. It is absurd to prohibit a filmmaker from creating an article about his own film. If you wish to buy a DVD, . I see no reason why Wikipedia should have an article for this but not for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfY2_1m-2Jk&t=1805s this].

30px :Draft:VIYCE, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:VIYCE and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of :Draft:VIYCE during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I have not created this account purely for self-promotion. I have created it so that Wikipedia can be more complete. If my draft for VIYCE is accepted, I will go on to edit articles not related to my work. If my draft is not accepted, I must persist in editing it and resubmitting it until you value it as a competent article which meets your standards. I have been honest and transparent in my edits, and have not lied or done anything shady. I wrote an article for my movie. I don't care that it is my movie. It is a movie without an article, thus, it deserves one. I suggest you watch it, beginning to end, then decide. My article is not spam, it is accurate and truthful. Fraction7 (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC) | decline = You cant use Wikipedia to tell the world about your film. You offer no independent reliable sources that have significant coverage of your film, nor have you shown that it meets the notability guidelines written at WP:NFILM. If you just want to tell the world about your film, you should use social media or a personal website that you control. Please read about conflict of interest. Since you indicate that you will persist in editing about your film, you cannot be unblocked at this time. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|reason=Please unblock me so that I may discuss this in a reasonable and thoughtful manner. I do not understand why I have been blocked, nor do I consider my film, VIYCE, invalid for an article on here. I wish to talk this over.Fraction7 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)|decline=Wikipedia doesn't have articles on just anything that exists. Instead, we have criteria for notability, such as WP:NFILM for films. Your film doesn't meet those criteria; thus Wikipedia should not have an article about it. That's not something that can be fixed by editing the page. This has been explained to you before (including in the reply to the unblock request right above). You seem unwilling to accept those explanations. Unblocking you would thus just waste more time (including your time). Huon (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)}}

Someone else will be along to review(and decline) this request, but please state what it is that you do not understand about "You cannot use Wikipedia to tell the world about your film" and "spam/advertising only account", the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not using Wikipedia to tell the world about my film, I am using Wikipedia to make Wikipedia more complete and accurate. I would not need to write an article on my film if somebody had already, but I can find no results for my film, so I can see that an article is in need of creation. Fraction7 (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

:The mere existence of your film does not merit it an article. Please read WP:NFILM for what does merit films an article here. You have said elsewhere that no independent sources have written about your film, that means it cannot have an article here. You have to get word out about your film in some other way. 331dot (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not attempting to get word out about my film. I am only creating an article for a film which exists. It is an OK film. Not Citizen Kane, but a film nonetheless. Why does it matter that no newspapers have talked about my film? How can they if they do not know that it exists? Of course they will write about Vice by Adam McKay. He is famous! Lots of people have seen Vice by Adam McKay. My film, Viyce, is less well-known. This is not my fault. I made the film. Nobody has seen my movie. Since it is readily accessible, I have come to the conclusion that they do not wish to view my film. If they choose not to watch my film, that is their choice and I am not responsible if people refuse to watch my movie. It's a good movie nonetheless with a two hour runtime and a plot. Fraction7 (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

• I just wanted to note in light of the unblock request that this user has now been banned 3 times from the help channel and has continued to engage in evasion despite this but has also apparently made it their mission to continue to waste people's times. Their block has been thoroughly explained, multiple times as has the deletion. We've gotten far past WP:IDHT. Praxidicae (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

This is a lie- I only engage in constructive discussion. My only wish is an article for my film. It is an OK film. It exists. it's an Ok film. There should be an article for it. Fraction7 (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

• Since it is clear you are not hearing or just ignoring what you are being told, I have decided to remove talk page access. Any admin is free to restore it if they see merit in doing so. If your request is declined, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 22:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

{{UTRS-unblock-user|23811|Jan 22, 2019 22:27:40|closed}}--UTRSBot (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

{{UTRS-unblock-user|23813|Jan 23, 2019 00:13:01|closed}}--UTRSBot (talk) 00:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)