User talk:FreddyWitDa$tacks#top

{{Talk header}}

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Primarks International School|Primarks International School]] (July 1)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any reliable independent sources or references.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Primarks International School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Primarks International School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Primarks_International_School Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Primarks_International_School reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| alt=Teahouse logo

|

Hello, FreddyWitDa$tacks!

Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

July 2022

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to :Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Primarks International School|Primarks International School]] (July 1)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Primarks_International_School Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

{{clear}}

Theroadislong (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. Your recent edit to :List of schools in Lagos appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Unblocking

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here FreddyWitDa$tacks (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC) |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  • #understand what you have been blocked for,
  • #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)}}

I know and I have understood that what I did is wrong but I was only trying to help, I didn't know that I was not doing the right thing

I'm very sorry this would never repeat itself again

Thank you!!