User talk:Fyukfy5#top

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history at :Eicosanoid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}You are continuing to defend an unsourced statement - you need a WP:MEDRS source for such a broad claim (which does not apply in the definition for hormone). Zefr (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

:Im not trying to war, I'm new to editing and I'm not sure why what I sources doesn't sufficed. I'd be happy for an explanation, furthermore, the article on hormones mentions eicosanoids being a hormone in the lead so this shouldn't be controversial Fyukfy5 (talk) 16:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

::The hormone article says "Among the substances that can be considered hormones, are eicosanoids" - that does not mean all eicosanoids are hormones. Zefr (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

- IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

:If you continue to violate WP:ECR as you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Israel&curid=14695&diff=1259737048&oldid=1259736667 here] you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

::Asking a genuine question is a violation? I legitimately don't have/can't find that information Fyukfy5 (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

::yes, it is. You are not supposed to edit talk-pages (except for edit-requests) until you have been registered for 30 days, and have at least 500 edit. If you continue to violate that: expect to be blocked. Huldra (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

:::I didn't edit the page, I posted a reply as is allowed, the only edits I make are to my own comments if there's a mistake Fyukfy5 (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

::::The only edits you can make related to the Arab/Israel conflict are edit requests. You cannot take part in discussions until you are extended-confirmed. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

:@Fyukfy5, are you able to advise how you happened across that RFC? Did anyone advise you of it occurring? TarnishedPath^talk 02:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

::Bruh who are y'all Fyukfy5 (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Kindly confine your editing in the PIA area to edit requests only along with any follow up due to requests for clarification. Asking for a title change is not an edit request. Selfstudier (talk) 12:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

:Where can I see exactly what violations I committed and where? Fyukfy5 (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

::@User:ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Makeandtoss&diff=prev&oldid=1267991565 This] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gaza_Strip_famine&diff=prev&oldid=1267989932 this] are both violations of ECR. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Israel&diff=prev&oldid=1267345998 This] is getting involved in a consensus creating process, This whole section dealing with {{tq|Israel and British Mandatory Palestine which isn't modern day Palestine}}. You need to stay away from the topic area. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

:::The first 2 I suppose I understand though I don't see exactly why asking for a title change is different than any other edit Request.

:::Regarding the latter 2: The first I didn't get involved in consensus I made an edit request after an edit without consensus was made, my request is part of what brought on the renewed RfC. The Canaan dog one was just me saying how sources don't mention modern day Palestine in regards to a dog's natural territory, it wasn't anything political and I even said I don't oppose the inclusion of Palestine in the paragraph, just that there shouldn't be any sources at all. Fyukfy5 (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Canaan Dog without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

This is for your edit request at Talk:Israel. Israel's identity is an integral part of the conflict, and your request isn't a simple one not requiring discussion. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock|@331dot

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard

Appealing user: @Fyukfy5

Sanctioning user: @331dot

Sanction being appealed: 3 month block for my edit request about Israel's identity on Israel's talk page. (I don't know how to link to specific past requests but the sanction can be found on my talk page and the edit history on Israel's talk page).

Reason for appeal:

The reason given for my block is that "Israel's identity is an integral part of the conflict" and therefore I cannot make edit requests about Israel's identity.

I find this to be a troubling view because every detail pertaining to Israel is part of its identity and would not be allowed to be discussed about by non EC users. Everything from Israeli street names, to Israeli weather, to Israeli sports teams and Israeli inventions are part of its identity and if it's true that Israel's identity is integral to the conflict, all articles that have to do with those topics and so many more should be EC blocked and so should their talk pages.

My edit specifically was about adding Israel's identity as a Jewish state to the lede of the Israel article and didn't mention Israel's neighbors, Palestinians, war, or any other mention of the conflict. I hope we could all agree that the sole statement "Israel is a Jewish state" is not one which discusses conflict just as the statement "Bread is comprised of carbohydrates and wheat protein" is not one discussing Celiac's disease.

As a bit of an Orwellian fear, if this sanction stands then the same reasoning could be used by sanctioning users against any user they dislike or disagree with that has ever made an edit regarding anything in Israel or Palestine. Both these places are so much more than the conflict between them and they shouldn't be reduced or minimized to it.

All that being said I hold no ill will towards the sanctioning user. I dont know them but I have no reason to dislike them and I believe they were just trying to do what is best for this platform. Fyukfy5 (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)}}

I will do so shortly. I've formatted your above statement as an unblock request as the instructions call for. Note that articles and pages are only protected when necessary, and not preemptively. I might have not blocked had you not had prior AE blocks. The rules surrounding formally designated contentious topics are strictly enforced, and are broadly construed. Contributing about an Israeli sports team would probably not run afoul of the rules if just about the actual sporting event without referencing their conflict(though, say, a competitor pulling out of a competition with an Israeli due to the conflict would). You would not be sanctioned merely for posting if you had 500 edits(your account is old enough, but you don't meet that criteria). 331dot (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I have copied your appeal. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

@331dot

Hi, id like to make a few points if I'm allowed to do that in response to what some admins have said in my arbitration case, since I'm blocked I can't so Id appreciate your help in posting the following (and on a personal note, I'd like to again state no hard feelings. I know you're just trying to do your job):

Hello all, I'd like to clarify a few things in response to what I've read on my case:

1. If it is the consensus opinion on wikipedia that stating Israel's Jewish Identity is controversial/part of the conflict I'd like to apologize. While I evidently disagree I still respect the consensus opinion and truly didn't mean to make that claim as part of a controversial request.

2. The one point I'd like to rebut is @Rosguill's of my edit requests being narrowly focused on the conflict. Of the few topics I'm interested in editing and taking part in on wikipedia like American sports, medicine/biology, and this conflict, the latter is the only one that is broadly EC protected. Therefore, of course my requests are almost entirely on the topic of this conflict because it's the only one where I have to make requests and can't edit the page myslef. With that, as @Chess stated, I have been trying to make my requests more on the topic of semantics and such and not adding/retracting information because I know that that is more controversial. If semantics is also deemed a controversial edit request I need some more guidance on what is and isn't allowed. Fyukfy5 (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:Copied over. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)