User talk:HarryConroy5#top

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I feel I have been blocked unfairly firstly all the information I submitted in regards to bros was referenced and sourced correctly, evidence can be found threw internet searches, Harper Collins, books, official BPI certification and oi don't even know what sock puppetry means, so why I accused of this. in regards to the take that page I asked Harout72 was to prove his claims yet I am being bullied by people who nothing about bros history maybe cause they were around at the time and don't have access to sourced information I do, so unfair oi thought wiki for everyone yet its clear its just for the few for those who can rubbish on page and by people who bullie new user, I have now stop donating as I am not donating to page that allow people to inaccurate facts and bullied people just degustingHarryConroy5 (talk) 11:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC) | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
• #understand what you have been blocked for,
• #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
• #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC) | reason= Dear Wiki senior member I wish my Unblock to revoked on the following Grounds

1 - I was blocked because I challenged and proved that Harout72 claim on take that album sales were in accurate and Harout72 could not provide evidence to his claim so he accused me disruptive behaviour totally unfair because wiki for everybody and it's for everyone to challenge the content Freedom of speech, but certain members try to dominate the website Unfair

2- I have done over 100 edits all been sourced correctly and reference researched and provided in line with WIKI policy and even images uploaded, I find it unfair that members who don't reside in the UK nor no nothing about British music can control a page and then abuse their position and make stupid claims I thought wiki was fair but its seem its not its run by controlling bullies, please explain why I'm blocked and provided the evidenceHarryConroy5 (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=You socked. Your appeal is declined, and your talk page access has been revoked for repeated disruptive unblock appeals. Courcelles (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)|reason=

1- Dear Sir I have not disruptive any page I simply altered Take that album sales to reflect accurate sales

and would it be possibale for UK admin to address the issue as Yamala has not read or understood I've not done anything wrong if editing wiki so true facts are made and not misleading ones then yes I done something wrong but I thought wiki was about true facts not made up ones.

3- so this block unfair please ask Harone72 to provide this informationif you cant then my block unfounded}}