User talk:Imcdc

Hi there!

I removed the prod from the Schoel Engineering page (formerly listed as "Walter Schoel Engineering Co")

I've begun expanding the article and will continue to do so over the upcoming days. QuiteBearish (talk) 04:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:DeepSeek logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:DeepSeek logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia page mover.svg

Hello, Imcdc. Your account has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AImcdc granted] the "{{mono|extendedmover}}" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• :Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! – robertsky (talk) 02:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks @Robertsky. As discussed this is mainly to reduce the number of page move and review requests. Imcdc Contact 02:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi lmcdc. Thanks you for creating this wiki page for our daughter. We had recently been drafting content for this when I noticed that you had already created one for her. I've been making some corrections and additions but notice that you have been undoing my changes. Please let me know how I can collaborate with you to ensure the content is accurate and complete. Thanks in anticipation. JulesFornarino (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:@JulesFornarino As this page is about your daughter, you have a direct conflict of interest. See WP:COIREQ on procedures to make a request for changes. A neutral third party editor will look at your request when free and will implement them if they are within WP:POLICY. Imcdc Contact 01:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks lmcdc. I'm new to this. Would I be able to send you my suggested corrections (eg; Fornarino is repeatedly misspelt as Fornarine) and additional content for your review. JulesFornarino (talk) 01:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:::@JulesFornarino That spelling error has already been corrected I believe. As for other COI amendments, I don't really handle these sort of requests anymore and will leave it to a more experienced editor to handle these sort of edits. See WP:COIREQ for the procedures to follow. If you want a past example of how this is done, refer to Talk:Kewsong Lee although this is for a business executive. Also please disclose your connection in your account's user page so people know your relationship to subject. Imcdc Contact 01:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

::::Thanks again Imcdc. I can see the spelling error has been corrected. I've now disclosed my relationship to Adele in my account user page. I'll follow your suggestions to provide further corrections and additions for review, verification and inclusion. Can I ask how you became aware of Adele and why this led you to create this page on her, which we greatly appreciate. Thanks again for all your guidance here to a newbie! JulesFornarino (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::@JulesFornarino Winning two golds at the the same time at the ADCC Submission Fighting World Championship is not easy to ignore. You may use this Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI to make things easier. Imcdc Contact 02:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Imcdc,

How's it going? Back to a query on Primavera Capital Group page:

Just wanted to clarify your last comment on the page to avoid any issues - "Changing history to be in order. Just put the most notable deals on here".

Will add only the deals with firms having Wiki pages & had the below approach in mind:

- Under History: create a sub section for 3 deal types (to keep things interesting for readers).

- Deal types: ESG related, F&B & Others; 2-3 prominent deals (max) in each of the categories. So, total of top 6-8 deals will be added.

Please let me know, if this works?

As always appreciate your feedback. Cheers WorldPeace888 (talk) 13:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

:@WorldPeace888 Suggest you speak with @CNMall41 this time. Imcdc Contact 13:36, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

::ok noted, thanks a ton. WorldPeace888 (talk) 02:03, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

I seconded your prod, but an IP address, with no other edits ever, deprodded it without any discussion or reasoning. Bearian (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Bearian thanks for letting me know. I also see the same was done by Grand City Properties by a low edit SPA user.

:I suspect that even though the user that created these related network of businesses was blocked, the coi editors are still around to make the process harder.

:May I seek your view on the best way to proceed? Can we go for speedy deletion or is AFD the only way? - Imcdc Contact 16:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

::AfD is our last option. Bearian (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

:::@Bearian Got it. I've decided to nominate them both for AFD here and here. Imcdc Contact 03:09, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, thanks for your reversions, and requesting a block this morning. I have now had a little time to delve back, and created User:Arjayay/B B which lists the IPs I have tracked down, and the articles vandalized, of which there are remarkably few. I have saved a "Related changes" search for that page, which will list every new alteration, without adding them to my (overlong) watchlist. Please feel free to do the same, if you wish, and please let me know of any more IPs you have found that have been falsifying figures in this area. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:@Arjayay Thanks. I had a quick look. I really didn't expect this problem to be so big. What's going on here?!?! Is there some campaign to mislead viewers on Buddhism here? Anyway, I will try to see what I can do later when I get more time. Seems much bigger issue than I anticipated - Imcdc Contact 15:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

::@Arjayay Lets just use your page to keep track of things. I have added a few more IPs to it. Seems this is a coordinated move by both India and Bangladesh IPs. Can't believe these changes were allowed to persist for months. Might need to have a large clean up of all this mess. Also do you think we need to report a sockpuppet case? I have a feeling it could be the same user that was previously blocked. Imcdc Contact 03:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks for the additions to the list, although I'm not sure about the 122.182 IP, it's the only one to edit that article, and the phraseology is totally different. As for an SPI, what would you ask to be investigated? There is a reluctance to associate accounts with IPs, and the only IP to have edited recently is currently blocked for 2 weeks. - Arjayay (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Ok in that case maybe leave SPI alone in that case. The 122.182 does have different phrasing. Maybe its a different user but at the same time, it is also making disruptive edits related to buddhism and its also quite recent so its probably worth keeping an eye out. Imcdc Contact 09:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::@Arjayay

:::::Got a question {{IP|103.205.36.8}} has been making disruptive edits on Religion in China. Another Bangladesh IP which is recorded on your page. I wanna ask since it starts with 103.205 rather 103.137, could this be the user as the blocked IP that is currently ban evading? Do we have a case for suggesting range ban to include this address too? Imcdc Contact 09:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::I saw your addition of IP:103.137.161.68 to the list and reported them for block evasion - The range 103.137.161.0/24 has now been blocked for a week. As for the {{IP|103.205.36.8}} editor - that IP was already listed - you could ask for a block evasion ban, but it might be better to wait for another edit to be made after the rangeblock was imposed. Up to you - Arjayay (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@Arjayay I have added User:Rohanganvir20 to your list. Do you think its a sockpuppet of User:Joseph Chakma? I find it an odd coincidence that both accounts just so happened to be created on the same week, edit in the same month, cover the same topics related to Buddhism and both were inactive until just yesterday where they suddenly had activity on the same day. Imcdc Contact 07:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Imcdc, I agree there seems to be a high degree of correlation in the dates, however, they have never edited the same article, so they may be being careful, or clever. As your last post will have notified ("pinged") User:Rohanganvir20 (and User:Joseph Chakma} of this discussion, I suspect that, if there is a connection, they are unlikely to continue. You could take it to SPI, based on the date and subject matter correlation; if you wish to do that, I would do so fairly soon, before an admin considers it "stale". - Arjayay (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Imcdc. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shore Capital Partners".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Shore Capital Partners|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)