User talk:Inspector Eevee

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

| age =2160

| archiveprefix =User talk:Inspector Eevee/Archive

| numberstart =1

| maxarchsize =75000

| header ={{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minkeepthreads =5

| format = %%i

}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}

Welcome!

Hi Inspector Eevee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

A quick tip

Hi, I have noticed your contributions and since you want to fight vandalism, I recommend that you use Twinkle. To use this, go to your preferences, gadgets and use command + f and type Twinkle. Enable it, scroll to the bottom and hit save. Then enjoy HOW FAST it is to use Twinkle. Bigeshjen (talk) 16:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Bigeshjen

:@Bigeshjen I can't use Twinkle until my account is 4 days old. Thanks for the tip! Inspector Eevee (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

::Hi, I was new page patrolling and I saw you issue warnings to vandals again. And I can happily say that your account now is 4 days old! So you should be able to use Twinkle. Bigeshjen (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

:::@Bigeshjen Yes, I have begun using Twinkle. It's a very good tool. Thanks!

February 2023

This [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASweet6970&diff=1137707524&oldid=1134482477] is a personal attack, because it makes a false accusation without evidence. See WP:NPA Sweet6970 (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

:{{ping|Sweet6970}} I don't want to start an argument, because if you look at the message I sent you it says that you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, the key word being appear. It was not meant to be a personal attack, and I am sorry if you mistook it as such. However, as a result of your argument with the other user in the talk page and the reverts, I just wanted to post a friendly reminder on your talk page so things do not escalate. Even though you reverted once, the other user reverted your version back, so I had to leave a message on both talk pages. I hope you understand. Inspector Eevee (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

::No, it does not ‘appear’ that I was engaged in an edit war. You can read the template you left on my Talk page, which says that edit warring means {{tq|that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree.}}. So it is obviously wrong to place this template on the page of someone who has only reverted once. You knew it is a baseless accusation. You did not have to place such a template on my Talk page. Don’t do it. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

:::@Sweet6970 Sorry for the late response. I was only trying to prevent an edit war. You claim that I know it is a baseless accusation, which it is not, and therefore are accusing me. I don't want to argue any further, and the template on your talk page was only meant to be a friendly reminder. (By the way I meant to use the softer wording for the template but I misclicked.) Furthermore, based on your language on the article's talk page, you were poised to revert the other editor's changes again. I was acting in good faith, and since you clearly don't believe that and keep attacking me, you're violating Wikipedia's policies. Inspector Eevee (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

::::I see you are now trying to justify your baseless attack on me by telling me what I was about to do (!) The template you placed on my Talk page cannot possibly be interpreted as a ‘friendly reminder’. It could only create unpleasantness – which it has done. By placing that template on my Talk page, you were making a personal attack on me. You have not apologised. Just stop it. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

:::::@Sweet6970 Alright, fine. I apologize for putting the warning on your Talk page and your misinterpretation of it. I still think you shouldn't have responded to my reminder in this way, misguided or not, and you too should apologize. Inspector Eevee (talk) 02:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

::::::And also if you look at the page history, there seems to be an minor edit war in progress now. Inspector Eevee (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

:::::::Thank you for the apology. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)