User talk:Invasive Spices

Whoever did that thank you. I had wanted to do that but couldn't understand how to get it. Invasive Spices (talk) 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Blowup is an interesting choice of words. That film inspired The Conversation and othersab. That makes me curious why this term was used. Invasive Spices (talk) 23 January 2023 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Borer_(diambiguation)&redirect=no Borer (diambiguation)] to the article Borer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20#Redirects with "(diambiguation)"}} until a consensus is reached.

::Unsigned comment by Dsuke1998AEOS at 01:44, 20 May 2023

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religiously_motivated_antipathy_toward_Native_Americans_in_the_United_States&redirect=no Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 18#Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States}} until a consensus is reached.

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Film_rehearsal_in_the_United_States&redirect=no Film rehearsal in the United States] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 19#Film rehearsal in the United States}} until a consensus is reached.

Unsigned comment by {{u|Mdewman6‬}} 23:54, 19 June 2023

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

• Hello {{Ping|The C of E}} Because the page is grammatically correct and pertains to the target, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G1 section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion does not apply. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
• :Agree. {{u|BusterD}}, please undelete, it was a valid redirect to a section that exists in an article that exists. Since the redirect was functional, it was not "incoherent text or gibberish", and so G1 cannot apply. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
• ::The reason why I SPEEDYed it was because the phrase doesn't even appear in the target and it just seems that long and unwieldy, that no-one would have been looking for it. I certainly didn't connect this phrase to the target article. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
• :::Literaly the same phrase in the target isn't necessary for a redirect, and indeed they are more needed when they are concept redirects which would not be obvious otherwise. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
• I agree it doesn't fall under G1, but should still be deleted. WP:RFD the place. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_calls_followers_to_save_America_if_he_is_arrested&redirect=no Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 4#Trump calls followers to save America if he is arrested}} until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Scandinavia&redirect=no Northern Scandinavia] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 10#Northern Scandinavia}} until a consensus is reached. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :NPR1 (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant dab page. I've already added hatnotes to the relevant pages. BLAR reverted because the other editor thinks this should be deleted instead, so I guess I'm PRODing instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toadspike [Talk] 10:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hello {{Ping|Toadspike}} The more obvious option would be to add the other NPR1s to the dab, beginning with radio. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

::@{{U|Bkonrad}} – Invasive Spices (talk) 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

::That's the problem – there isn't anything else called "NPR1", and the radio app doesn't have an article. I've added hatnotes to NPR1 already, so readers can find the other two articles if they land there. Since there is a primary topic, the disambiguation page at a "(disambiguation)" title is not useful. Toadspike [Talk] 05:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Hello {{Ping|Toadspike}}

:::{{Tq|there isn't anything else called "NPR1"}}

::::NPR-1 (disambiguation).

:::{{Tq|and the radio app doesn't have an article}}

::::I don't understand the problem – there are many of those MOS:DABSECTION.

:::Invasive Spices (talk) 19:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Interesting, I didn't know that DAB page existed. If we merge all the entries from NPR1 and NPR-1 to a single DAB page then it would have a valid reason for existing. I might add the entries from NPR1 to NPR-1.

::::The problem with NPR1 right now is that it has a primary topic, NPR1, so readers land at that article first. From there, via hatnotes, they can get to the two other articles (including the section about NPR One, the radio app) within a single click via the hatnotes. There's no point having a hatnote to a DAB page instead, which would require all readers to make two clicks to get to the other pages. So, for now, the DAB is redundant. Toadspike [Talk] 20:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

:::I should also say that I would agree with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC but for the existence of other things. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)