User talk:Jolielover#What comment ...

The article Goodnight Chicken you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Goodnight Chicken for comments about the article, and Talk:Goodnight Chicken/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 07:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

The article Jeremy Allen White you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Jeremy Allen White for comments about the article, and Talk:Jeremy Allen White/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 26 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marilyn Fisher Lundy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marilyn Fisher Lundy developed one of Michigan's first accredited charter schools? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marilyn Fisher Lundy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-03-16&end=2025-04-05&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Marilyn_Fisher_Lundy Marilyn Fisher Lundy]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hi Jolielover, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

:The entertainment industry is the biggest in the United States so it makes sense for the infobox in the Wikipedia page about fame to be American centric. EclipseExpress (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

::Hi there, please start a new section next time, it is much appreciated; regarding Celebrity, I very much disagree. Bollywood for instance is a massive industry (in a country with over 1 billion people). I also took the luxury of making each person have a different reason for getting famous, to demonstrate a wide variety of options. Currently, your edit makes 5/6 people American - Wikipedia already has a massive issue with western bias so I really do not understand the need for this. jolielover♥talk 21:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

I see that you have told the author of this potentially almost limitless series of articles that they are possible not notable, and have drafified them. I agree with you in that most of the content of those articles is simply about Ramadan. They are also grotesquely overlinked and full of fluff. But what prompted me put a not on your page is the fact that the editor is moving the articles back to mainspace; do you think they should go to AfD??TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:Well, if it's the same quality as before.. I would say yes. I'm not a scholar of Islam, but I don't think Ramadan traditions vary wildly between countries. For instance, the page on Ramadan in Saudi Arabia had a lot of non-notable events hosted by localities. I live in a Muslim country (next to Saudi, actually), and have seen plenty of similar events being put up by the government; it really is just not noteworthy, and Wikipedia is not a directory for such events. From what I have seen, the articles just recount what Ramadan is and then are full of original research. jolielover♥talk 13:54, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 4 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nora Helmer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Nora Helmer was subject to extensive controversy upon her 1879 debut, she is now considered a focal point in analysis of gender roles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nora Helmer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-03-25&end=2025-04-14&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Nora_Helmer Nora Helmer]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}}  — Amakuru (talk) 03:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 9 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Margaret Qualley said she cried when she first heard the song "Margaret"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-03-30&end=2025-04-19&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Margaret_(song) Margaret (song)]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 18 (One Direction song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you stop acting like WP:OWN at One Direction. Not all of us experienced editors agree with every bit of you monumentally extensive remodelling there, and if you hope to pass Good article you'll need all the friends you can get. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:???

:Dude, given that the discussion came to a stand-still I just assumed everyone moved on. I don't own the article and have tried to discuss the issue, but really, what more can I do? I requested 3O, went to the dispute resolution board. The article's already at GA, I'm trying to get it to FA, and sorry, I just feel like you're assuming bad faith against me when I really don't mean to be rude or anything.

:I don't get why you take my edits as negative. Sure, it was 'extensive remodelling', but I arguably brought the article to a much better status than it was before, like getting rid of several questionable sources, even one deprecated source that slipped by. I don't see the extensive remodelling as anything negative. And, I really just have to ask why you have such a stake in the article. Last I checked, you had like 3 edits- one adding the image in 2012, one minor edit, and one adding the image back this year. I agree that nobody owns an article, but you have to realize it kind of comes off like you feel like you own it, too. Again, I've tried to explain my edits. I just really don't understand this. jolielover♥talk 18:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

::"what more can I do?" - you can refain from calling me or anyone else "Dude", for starters. "I really don't mean to be rude or anything" mm hm. When one assumes "everyone moved on" and takes advantage of that by trying - again! - to get ones own way despite discussion, one leaves onself open for justifiable criticism re: being sneaky, to say the least. The only thing I might claim to own is many years of extensive insight, after a few years of trial-and-error of my own, into how things are done here and how they are not. Some of your behavior, in trying to do good work, unfortunately has ended up in the latter of those two distinctions. If it hadn't there would have been no need to write to you here, only to discuss relevant content issues at article talk. SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

I do appreciate your good work & intentions, your fascination with your favorite boy band as well as your age and inexperience on Wikipedia. If you take care to respect the opinions of other editors, especially experienced ones, and most importantly such admistrators who now have given you good advice, I'm sure you'll be OK. Don't look for a fight in discussions, don't insist on insignificant changes, and test every bit of text you add very carefully and objectively for encyclopedic relevance. That will help you with your Featured goal. Best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:Ok, thank you :) jolielover♥talk 16:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jolielover. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of :The dumbness of the EU cookie consent law, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not about a website. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

:Twinkle says A7 applies for websites and web content, and the article is about web content, no? jolielover♥talk 04:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

::I don't think "laws requiring websites to have cookie consent banners" is the kind of thing that A7 is meant to apply to, but even if it is, the EU cookie directive looks to be a notable topic. The problem with that article is that it's an essay, nothing to do with A7. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|BeanieFan11}} with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles, 28 Did you know articles, and one In the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Thebiguglyalien}} with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) and Grace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|History6042}} with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Gog the Mild}} with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Arconning}} with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant16|Generalissima}} for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 30 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeremy Allen White, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jeremy Allen White{{`s}} underwear campaign with Calvin Klein earned US$12.7 million in media exposure in less than 48 hours? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jeremy Allen White. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-04-20&end=2025-05-10&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Jeremy_Allen_White Jeremy Allen White]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}}  — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Jolielover, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Template:Did you know nominations/Jeremy Allen White for DYK points, but unfortunately it is not eligible for DYK points because it was nominated to DYK as a newly promoted GA. I know this can be disappointing, but Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#Did you know? states that only newly created or expanded DYKs are eligible for DYK points. The rules specifically exclude DYK submissions from receiving points if their appearance on DYK is solely because the article was a newly promoted GA. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I've started an ANI discussion about the ongoing AfD war. I thought Id' let you know since you have been involved in the discussion. Cortador (talk) 20:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Regina George (Mean Girls)/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Regina George (Mean Girls) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

The article Regina George (Mean Girls) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Regina George (Mean Girls) and Talk:Regina George (Mean Girls)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regina George (Mean Girls), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Regina George (Mean Girls) you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Regina George (Mean Girls) for comments about the article, and Talk:Regina George (Mean Girls)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

25px Hello! Your submission of Regina George (Mean Girls) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Hiya - just a quick note. I've seen in a couple of discussions you've mentioned that UAE media are all state owned. While UAE broadcasters are, indeed state owned (with the exception of some radio broadcasters, such as Ajman Channel 4), Khaleej Times (Galadari family), Gulf News (Al Tayer), Al Khaleej and Gulf Today (Al Taryam) are all privately held. The National, Al Etihad and Al Bayan are state owned, although The National is the most editorially robust of the English papers. Most, if not all, the magazine publishers (Motivate, ITP, CPI et al) are all private and many are expat-owned. No biggie, just thought I'd highlight that. They'll all generally be pretty uncritical, and there are issues of tone at times, but all are generally factually correct in their reporting. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for letting me know! jolielover♥talk 05:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 11:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 29 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crazy About One Direction, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a false viral rumour claimed 42 people committed suicide after their homoerotic fan art was included in the film Crazy About One Direction{{-?}} The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crazy About One Direction. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-05-19&end=2025-06-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Crazy_About_One_Direction Crazy About One Direction]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello there. Let's try to reach a consensus so we dont end up in an edit war. You said on Louis Tomlinson, that his birth surname is likely Austin but we shouldn't speculate. I don't really see this as speculation, his birth name obviously wasn't Tomlinson as he adopted that from his stepfather at a later age. So it 100% had to have been Austin (from his father) or Poulston (from his mother), and babies born to un-wed parents in the uk generally receive the fathers surname. However, i do agree that we dont know for sure which it was, so i think its probably best to add in a note saying his birthname isn't tomlinson as he later adopted that, or we could just leave it as it is. what do you think? Cherryblossomgirly (talk) 04:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:That's already inferred in the article; {{tq|Louis was born...}} then; {{tq|He is estranged from his father, and took on his then-stepfather Mark Tomlinson's surname, legally changing his name to Louis Tomlinson.}} It's already clear that Tomlinson isn't his birth name, so another note emphasising that isn't necessary. jolielover♥talk 04:39, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

The article White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie for comments about the article, and Talk:White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 15:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Marriage in the United Arab Emirates/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Marriage in the United Arab Emirates you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Marriage in the United Arab Emirates you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Marriage in the United Arab Emirates for comments about the article, and Talk:Marriage in the United Arab Emirates/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 18 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Regina George, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Regina George was once voted the "meanest high school film character of all time"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Regina George (Mean Girls). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-06-08&end=2025-06-28&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Regina_George Regina George]), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2025 (UTC)