User talk:JuxtaposedJacob#top

File:JuxtaposedJacob.png

{{hatnote|I regularly remove Signpost, election, etc. notifications from this talk page. However, any other notices, including bot-sent notices of possible missteps, are kept for transparency. Thanks for visiting!}}

{{archives}}

Hey besties

Welcome to my talk page!

[[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Canadian stations)]]

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent revert here.

A train station is not something that should be categorized as "science and technology". Why have you added this category here? 162 etc. (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

:It is fine if you disagree with the categorisation. I am trying to establish parity with Wikipedia:WikiProject style advice, as the naming conventions and MoS pages have similar concentrations in certain areas and because they have similar topics. The categories were chosen because they matched the initial system of categorization from the style templates. (You are free to disagree with this system as well.) It was hard to make some fit over there and in this case, but I counted train stations as part of technology. (I have not yet completed the naming conventions categorization, nor do I plan to in the near future.)

:Let me know your thoughts. Have a good evening!

:JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 02:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

::Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Canadian stations) is already categorized under :Category:Wikipedia naming conventions (stations), a subcategory of :Category:Wikipedia naming conventions (transportation). I definitely see this as more accurate than "science and technology".

::I note that you've also added :Wikipedia:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways) to the science and technology category, which is another head-scratcher. 162 etc. (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

:::Again, technology. In the future I can make a transportation subcategory. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 03:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

::::I'm definitely not seeing how these changes are improving anything. See WP:BROKE. I'm reverting all articles back to their stable versions. Please discuss any proposed changes to obtain consensus at the relevant WikiProject talk pages (WT:STATIONS, WP:HWY, etc.) 162 etc. (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::Ok, sounds alright. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 16:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

File:Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! {{clear}} jolielover♥talk 13:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Inadvertent

Yes, was cleaning up my watchlist while editing on a tablet and accidentally tapped the rollback link. Just clumsy. Restored your edit. Montanabw(talk) 07:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for the note, have a good night! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 07:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Any interest in USPS edit requests?

Hey Jacob, this is Jonathan from the US Postal Service. You recently reviewed and implemented a COI edit request that I posted to the Louis DeJoy Talk page (link here). Thanks for handling that. I was wondering if you might have time to review a couple of active requests on the USPS Talk page. The first (link here) is a pretty simple one that seeks to update a few aspects of the Operations and budget subsection. The second (link here) seeks to add a few new passages about recent service expansion and service standard updates to the Delivering for America subsection. Both of these requests have been sitting for a while, so I would deeply appreciate any help you could provide.

Of course, you should feel no obligation to help out. I know you're a volunteer editor. I just thought I would ask since you demonstrated interest in a USPS-related article. Thanks again, and perhaps we'll talk soon. Cheers! Jonathan with U.S. Postal Service (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

:@Jonathan with U.S. Postal Service I will check out your requests. I just watched his page because of the Richmond connection. I don't have the capacity to fix more in the future.

:JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 05:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)