User talk:LastJabberwocky#Precious

Hi LastJabberwocky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Mach61 01:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freestyle_Chess_Grand_Slam_Tour&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1275424732%7CFreestyle%20Chess%20Grand%20Slam%20Tour%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20LastJabberwocky§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1275424732 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

As per the message on your userpage, it's great that you've decided to help out, but you might want to have a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Future_Days&diff=1279605048&oldid=1279588436 this diff]. It introduces grammar errors in the second and third lines of the article, which isn't a good look. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Ashley Pomeroy, I couldn't find grammar errors, but the lead certainly was incoherent in parts. I tweaked it. LastJabberwocky (talk) 07:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, LastJabberwocky,

I had to untag several articles you tagged for BLPPRODs because they violated the basic eligibility for this tag: {{tq|To be eligible for a BLPPROD tag, the entry must be a biography of a living person and contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography}}. In other words, the article was not the biography of a living person but were articles about musical groups or musical acts. BLPPRODs are intended to be for unsourced biographies of individuals, not groups.

Please review WP:BLPPROD if you have any questions about this deletion process. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Also, please know that for a BLLPPROD, having external links counts as "sources". But you can always try using a regular PROD instead if an article is not eligible for a BLPPROD. Just supply a policy-based deletion rationale when you tag the article for consideration for proposed deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::@Liz Good morning! I realized the BLPPROD nomination probably wouldn't work on bands since they are organizations/groups, but in all cases I nominated individuals doesn't have, so I thought the group is ALSO their biography (I need read more about BLP :)). I put them for discussion spreading it through a couple of months. LastJabberwocky (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for your work cleaning up the backlog of unreferenced articles! When you WP:BLAR an article, could you try to check if it's linked in the target page, and if so unlink it? This saves people reading the article from thinking "oh, neat, more information about this subject" and then being looped right back where they started. Not a big deal, just a nice bit of cleanup. Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Regarding the GA nomination for JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, I completely forgot about the authorship part of nominating, so thanks for reminding me about that! I'm currently #6 on the [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/JoJo%27s%20Bizarre%20Adventure authorship] list, so I'm a lot closer to being able to actually nominate it, but I still couldn't have done it without you! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:@OpalYosutebito No worries, one of my initial thoughts: what if I pick up review anyway; the main of the review is to improve the article and we can do that. But there are so many active editors that contributed to the page and can be potentially hurt (out of top five four are active). BUT I think it's fine. You can already co-nominate the article with the guy/gal with dominant 30% authorship. All if they are busy, you can solo nominate! LastJabberwocky (talk) 05:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

::That sounds pretty good to me, but I'll be sure to crack down on it towards the middle of May, when school is over - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

You recently put up a deletion proposal for eurobeat vocalist for Elena Ferretti. As a eurobeat fan I am sad to see her lack significant coverage but that's par for the course of someone who was only famous in non-English speaking nations. However, looking at other eurobeat artists I have found that many of them use few sources, mostly primary ones. Do you think that maybe these other people should also get deletion proposals? The only artists I can see with some notability in the English-speaking world are Dave Rodgers (although his article isn't the best), Ken Laszlo (solely because of Tonight) and Annerley Gordon (because of her non-eurobeat stuff). GarethBaloney (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Like here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Revolve_(Danger_Danger_album)&diff=prev&oldid=1288127410 can you then also remove the link from templates? (in this case Template:Danger Danger -FMSky (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

:Well, I removed several of the links; there is only one stray left. I'll get it! —LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Ege Bamyasi/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Ege Bamyasi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Noticed on your talk page you've been doing this for awhile. I just undid two of your redirects pertaining to Edgar Rice Burroughs characters which, at a minimum, should stay until an AfD discussion. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:Randy Kryn, I'm picking only articles that potentially lack notability and if I can I save them removing notability warning. In this case you're right there are two sources that can be expanded into make an article (for both characters I touched). I'll remove the notability warning. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks. That's what I mean, if there were two mistakes in a row maybe a much more careful look at both the pages you wish to delete (I consider redirects such as this deletions as what people usually do when "redirecting" pages is not merge any of the informative information) and those you've already redirected. Thanks. I just happened to see these two because I have them and the Barsoom navbox on my watchlist. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@Randy Kryn Well, I redirected because a character page needs something extra (analysis, cultural impact, discussion by nice sources). In this case they didn't have information that can be merged. Barsoom already has brief bios for both of them and the two book sources. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:42, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

::::I understand that, and have been called an ultra-inclusionist because of things like this, yet full pages on characters from a major series by Burroughs seem notable if sources exist. Maybe if at all questionable you can Afd pages and not just remove them (editors, in some cases many editors, have worked on each page deleted/redirected, and in doing so put their thought and energy into them). Apologies, I don't like criticizing other editors in such a way and hinder their work, just that others have worked on those page too. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Ege Bamyasi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ege Bamyasi and Talk:Ege Bamyasi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

The article Ege Bamyasi you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Ege Bamyasi for comments about the article, and Talk:Ege Bamyasi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

{{user precious|header=good article rescue|thanks=for quality articles such as Ege Bamyasi, for rescuing good articles such as Wanna Be Startin' Somethin', for redirecting less notable topics, for reviewing for good article such as Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott, BWV 80, - Michael,}}

You are recipient no. 2971 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)