User talk:Lertaheiko#top

Hi Lertaheiko! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Daisytheduck. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Robert A. Good without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Daisytheduck ^{quack quack} 01:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Bagumba. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Johnny Buss, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :Johnny Buss, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, you can refer to MOS:OVERLINK about unneeded links and MOS:NOPIPE about piping redirects. —Bagumba (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Johnny Buss, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. That contradicts that his page says he was still married to another woman. Per WP:CIRCULAR: "{{tq|Do not use articles from Wikipedia ... Confirm that these sources support the content, then use them directly.|q=yes}} Finally, WP:TMZ is not reliable enough. —Bagumba (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

:@Bagumba I've had to revert a lot of this editor's changes because they keep marking major changes as minor as well as removing a lot of "unused" parameters from infoboxes. Mason (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

:Both the mairrage info for Johnny and Christy contradicted each other. They should now be all consistent with each other. Thank you. Lertaheiko (talk) 16:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hi Lertaheiko! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at :Gorgias that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Smasongarrison. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Gregory Nagy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove unused parameters like you did here. It's disruptive and makes it more difficult for people to add that information. Mason (talk) 03:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

:I thought it was helpful since it makes the editing screen less cumbersome/bloated. I'll only remove them when it doesen't make sence within the context of the article, and ones that are deprecaded. Lertaheiko (talk) 17:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

::I don't think its a good idea for you to remove ones that don't make sense within the article context, given that you're still new. I think you should spend your time learning the ropes of wikipedia. For example, you've been marking a lot of things as minor that aren't. And you seem to not understand that interarticle consistency is not a priority compared to sourcing. Mason (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Smasongarrison. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Isabelle Cogitore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop removing values from infoboxes Mason (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

:There weren't any unused parameters in the article. Lertaheiko (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

::You did not explain why you removed content. Further, you're at risk of an edit war by reverting reverts. Please slow down and take the advice given to you on your talk page. Mason (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Lertaheiko|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- Pemilligan (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

:It was around 15% before, but is now at 34%. Lertaheiko (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

::It should be much much higher. Mason (talk) 05:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

:::Go into your Preferences. There is an option you can opt for that will remind you when you edit and don't leave an edit summary. That way, you don't have to remember because the system won't accept your edit unless you provide an edit summary. If you look at experienced editors, they always include an edit summary to help other editors understand why they did what they did. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Lertaheiko,

For an editor who has only been active for a month, you have a LOT of warning messages on your User talk page. This is more than some editors receive over the course of an entire year. They mean that experienced editors have run into some of your edits which they have found problematic. I can see where all of these notices could seem overwhelming but if you want to be an editor for the long-term, it would be to your benefit to read over the problems they point out so that you can correct your editing mistakes.

If you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia, please feel free to bring them to the Teahouse where you can receive advice, support and a second opinion. Good luck with your editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in :Jim Buss. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't link successive geographical units per MOS:GEOLINK (e.g. don't link California separately in Los Angeles, California). —Bagumba (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page :Dippy has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Stop claiming the reverts are unexplained. They're not, and you claiming otherwise is inaccurate. I have explained these issues on your talk page. Mason (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isabella Binney Cogswell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Gial Ackbar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Kerbal Space Program 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gial Ackbar (talk) 11:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to :Kerbal Space Program 2, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. In this context, original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources don't explicitly say. Thank you. Apenguinlover<talk>() 23:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to :Nebkaure Khety, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You changed sourced dates; this is a BCE article as for WP:ERA; date of death is unsupported; "von" is integral part of Jurgen von Beckerath's name. Lone-078 (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Setut. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at :Setut, you may be blocked from editing. Source does not support the dates you claim and you are well aware of it. So please quit it. Lone-078 (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:Sorry, I thought the source said that he was active around 2160 and 2130 BC. Lertaheiko (talk) 20:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at :Susan Halabi. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:The date in the Hubbel Palmer article was in the infobox. I just added it after the name where it should go. Lertaheiko (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

::It is unsourced. It should be removed or sourced, not repeated. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you for fixing that. I removed a category because it was unsourced. Lertaheiko (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at :Tem (queen). Once and for all, stop inferring/inventing death dates by citing sources that do not explicitly state them. This is plain simple original research. Lone-078 (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

:Just to be clear, the source says that "she outlived her husband", King Mentuhotep II, who died around 2009 BC. It then says that she "was buried during her son's reign." Her son, Mentuhotep III reigned around 2000 BC. I suppose she could have been buried years after she died, but there are no sources for that. (also, thanks for fixing the Dieter Arnold link.) Lertaheiko (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Please stop rewriting taxoboxes to remove geologic time periods. It is standard to include them, and featured articles like Tyrannosaurus include them. If you don't stop I may be forced to report you to administrators Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

:You had also removed BP references at Oruanui eruption which have a precise meaning (ie years before 1950, not now) and yet again not understanding some finer points in the manual of style. In this case my subsequent corrective edits improved the lead and perhaps infobox so the net effect of correcting your edit was positive for the community. I suggest you refrain from editing dates in scientific/technical orientated articles until you have developed the necessary knowledge. ChaseKiwi (talk) 20:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

::I have done further corrections to dates on Akahoya eruption which you changed after the above comment. You failed to check references and removed the key reference making a mess in the citation list- now corrected to bring us back to Smith et als's date, according to latest calibration done by Okuno in 2019 and failed to adhere to MOS:CIRCA. ChaseKiwi (talk) 04:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

:::I just meant to change the date to something more reliable. I made sure to add multiple sources to prevent the perception that it was made up. Lertaheiko (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

::::The sources and debate on dates existed in the bulk of the article so it was never made up which is even more unlikely with a key archaeological marker tephra layer which has had multiple independent study. My technical Japanese is not that great but numbers and correction reasons were stated but not fully used by you. At this time I have kept {{tp|circa}} in the lead as using terms like about which are more readable may lack a certain precision. I hope this is useful and know many of my own past contributions have needed improvement ChaseKiwi (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I notice that several editors have already advised you of this. But, per WP:ES, contributors are expected to provide a brief explanation of the edits made to a Wikipedia page. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaulstown_Portal_Tomb&diff=prev&oldid=1279499443 this recent edit] (and more/most others from what I can tell) you did not provide any explanation/justification for the change you made. For example, without explanation, you changed "portal tomb" to "dolmen" (despite the title of the article using "portal tomb" and multiple sources in the article [including [https://www.archaeology.ie/sites/default/files/media/pdf/monuments-in-state-care-waterford.pdf NMS record], [https://www.megalithicmonumentsofireland.com/COUNTIES/WATERFORD/Gaulstown_PortalTomb.html Powell entry] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20150329104556/http://oldmooresalmanac.com/news-topics/the-history-of-us1/ancient-ireland-exploring-irish-historic-monuments.html almanac source] ] also using "portal tomb"). Absent an edit summary explanation, I can only assume that your change to a person name (so that it no longer reflected the source) and change to a county name (so that it no longer reflected MOS:IRISHCOUNTIES) were both made in error. And so I have reverted these changes. If you have a justification/explanation for these changes, then please take it to Talk. And, ideally, start using more complete edit summaries. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:On the article about the tombs, the title is Dolmen, not portal tomb. This usually means that name is more popular.

:I do have edit summaries most of the time. I sometimes don't add one when I only need to add/change a few things. Lertaheiko (talk) 03:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

::"I sometimes don't add one when I only need to add/change a few things" - given the many complaints above, this is not a good approach. Do them all the time, like you are supposed to. Johnbod (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Bridestones&diff=prev&oldid=1281487175 This edit] is not "fixing a link". Please provide proper edit summaries (and stop edit-warring). Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

::::United kingdom was linked, so I removed the link. You can see it removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Bridestones&diff=1281487175&oldid=1281334045 here]. I'll leave the rest of the contributions be. Lertaheiko (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Lone-078. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Khentetka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to :Iunre. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at :Prince Djedi, you may be blocked from editing. Lone-078 (talk) 16:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at :Hemetre. You went from adding unsourced material (mostly dates) to simply adding a ref name="0" template to invoke a source that would fictitiously support your claims. STOP trying to cheat the system. Lone-078 (talk) 06:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:It says she was a royal woman of the fourth dynasty. Lertaheiko (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

::So I ask you again to provide the page of the source you used. Furthermore, if that's what the source says, why would you use it to support instead your claims that she flourished c.2550 BC and that she was buried in Giza? Lone-078 (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:::The first sentence says that she was from the 4th dynasty. The source that is used cites pages 267–274. Hemetre may have been a daughter or granddaughter of Khafre, who rained c. 2558 – 2532 BC.

:::In the Tomb section, it says Hemetre's tomb (G 8464) is located in the Central Field which is part of the Giza Necropolis. Uses source 4 (Porter, Bertha and Moss, Rosalind, Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Statues, Reliefs and Paintings Volume III: Memphis, Part I Abu Rawash to Abusir. 2nd edition; revised and augmented by Dr Jaromir Malek, 1974. Retrieved from gizapyramids.org) as a citation. The Giza Necropolis is in Giza. Lertaheiko (talk) 17:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

::::My fault on the tomb. About the first point, in order to give a date you need a source that explicitly says that Hemetre flourished on that date. Needless to say, I haven't found this date anywhere in the source. What you have instead done, by your own admission, is combining two pieces of information:

::::A) Hemetre may have been the daughter or granddaughter of Khafre;

::::B) Khafre reigned c.2558 – 2532 BC. Thus:

::::A+B=C) Hemetre flourished c.2550 BC.

::::Regardless of whether A and B are sourced or not, this is original research, more specifically WP:SYNTHESIS and is not allowed on Wikipedia. Lone-078 (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2025 (UTC)