User talk:Luke.battersby#top

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Tree of Life Rejuvenation Center, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://treeofliferejuvenationcenter.wordpress.com/tree-of-life-rejuvenation-center.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg A tag has been placed on :Tree of Life Rejuvenation Center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

{{Quote box

| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

| source = Thank you.

| width = 20%

| align = right

}}

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{tl|hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hasteur (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article AdNews has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Unreferenced article that does not meet WP:GNG nor meets the specific notability guideline of WP:NCORP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 11:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

{{talkback|Hasteur|Adnews page name needs changing|ts=11:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)}}

Hasteur (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from :AdNews. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdNews until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The sentences you removed and that I restored have been revised. Instead of removing something like that, may I suggest you use a maintenance template. I've added the list below. You could copy it to your user page (user:Luke.battersby a redlink because you haven't added anything) for future reference. Also, you can start a discussion on the talk page talk:mental disorder, copy the sentences there and ask for some suggestions. This would likely get the fastest response. Perhaps:

• {{tlx|Clarify}}
• {{tlx|Clarify span}}
• {{tlx|Incomprehensible-inline}}

Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

{{Inline cleanup tags|state=collapsed }}

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :7-Eleven. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

It wasn't nonconstructive or vandalism, I didn't add it! We don't call it "severs" here, so it must be a colloquialism elsewhere. It didn't need a capital letter and bold text. Just looked wrong. And now that section has disappeared which is a better edit, thanks. Luke.battersby (talk) 07:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)